Project Change Risk and Opportunities Management

Strategic plan

Southern Bank Acquisition:

Strategic integration Plan

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

/0

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20

PAGE 21

PAGE 22

PAGE 23

PAGE 24

PAGE 25

PAGE 26

PAGE 27

PAGE 28

PAGE 29

PAGE 30

PAGE 31

PAGE 32

PAGE 33

PAGE 34

PAGE 35

PAGE 36

PAGE 37

PAGE 38

PAGE 39

PAGE 40

PAGE 41

PAGE 42

RUBRIC: KB70 33 PART B

1.

<70%

60- 69%

50- 59%

40- 49%

40%>

2

<70%

60- 69%

50- 59%

40- 49%

40%>

3

<70%

<7 0%

ACADEMIC RIGOUR

Critical appraisal o f literature gained f ro m a variety o f so urces; added insight resulting f ro m the analysis; deep understanding o f applicatio n o f theo ry and mo dels; Ef f ective iso latio n o f key issues and variables

Critical appraisal o f literature gained f ro m a variety o f so urces; clear understanding o f the implicatio ns resulting f ro m the analysis and the applicatio n o f theo ry and mo dels; so me iso latio n o f key issues and variables.

Appraisal o f literature gained f ro m a variety o f so urces; so me appreciatio n o f the implicatio ns resulting f ro m the analysis; superf icial applicatio n o f theo ry and mo dels; so me understanding o f key issues and variables.

Literature research narro w and presented uncritically; limited understanding o f key mo dule co ncepts; Descriptive writing with limited theo retical perspective.

Literature no t co nsulted o r irrelevant to assignment task. No reco gnitio n o f key mo dule co ncepts. No insight into case material. Writing is purely descriptive with no theo retical perspective.

<7 0%

MET HODOLOGY

Carried o ut in a rigo ro us and appro priate manner with reco gnitio n and critical analysis o f the co mplexity o f situatio ns. Bro ad and deep research undertaken and reviewed and ef f ective inco rpo ratio n into develo pment o f arguments.

Well co nsidered and appro priate testing o f theo ry against practice. Reco gnitio n and critical analysis o f co mplexity o f situatio ns. So me breadth and depth to research and inco rpo ratio n into develo pment o f arguments.

Reco gnitio n and critical analysis o f simple issues. Evidence o f f urther research and inco rpo ratio n into develo pment o f arguments.

Limited critical evaluatio n and lacks co nsistency. Base purely o n inf o rmatio n pro vided with no develo pment thro ugh research

No evidence o f attempt to be critical; no reco gnitio n o f need to develo p ratio nal argument in suppo rt o f ideas. No insight into case material.

<7 0%

EVALUAT ION OF DAT A

Analytical and clear, well gro unded in bo th literature theo ry and practice. Ability to reco gnise limitatio ns o f the analysis

60- 69%

50- 59%

40- 49%

40%>

4

<70%

60- 69%

50- 59%

40- 49%

40%>

Go o d develo pment o f arguments suppo rted by literature review and wo rk place practice

Evidence o f f indings and co nclusio ns gro unded in literature and wo rk place practice

Limited evidence o f f indings with very superf icial, surf ace appro ach to inf o rmatio n

Misses the po int o f the assignment. Unsubstantiated/invalid co nclusio ns based o n generailisatio ns o nly

<7 0%

PRESENT AT ION

Presentatio n sho ws a po lished and imaginative appro ach to the to pic. T ho ughts and ideas co herent and clearly expressed in a repo rt f o rmat. Arguments co ncisely and ef f ectively summarised. Grammar and spelling accurate. Fluent writing style. Ref erencing f ully co nsistent with the standard system. Executive Summary is an ef f ective abstract o f the who le repo rt, ref lects the f indings and appears at the start. Repo rt is o f an appro priate length.

Presentatio n caref ully and lo gically o rganised. T ho ughts and ideas clearly expressed in a repo rt f o rmat. Arguments clearly summarised. Grammar and spelling accurate and language f luent. Standard ref erencing system applied and co ntaining so me mino r erro rs. Executive Summary is an ef f ective abstract o f the who le repo rt, ref lects the f indings and appears at the start. Repo rt is o f an appro priate length

Presentatio n satisf acto ry, sho wing o rganisatio n and co herence. Reco gnisable repo rt f o rmat emplo yed. Language mainly f luent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate. Standard ref erencing system applied and is mainly accurate. Executive Summary pro vides a reaso nable abstract o f mo st o f the repo rt, and appears at the start. Repo rt is o f an appro priate length.

Presentatio n sho ws an attempt to o rganise in a lo gical manner. Repo rt f o rmat partially emplo yed. Meaning apparent, but language no t always f luent; grammar and spelling co ntains erro rs. Standard ref erencing system no t f ully applied o r is an irregular / unsystematic activity. Executive Summary do es no t pro vide an abstract o f the repo rt and / o r do es no t appear at the start.

Presentatio n is diso rganised / inco herent. Purpo se and meaning o f assignment unclear and / o r language, grammar and spelling co ntain erro rs. Standard ref erencing system is no t applied and theref o re wo rk suggests plagiarism. No Executive Summary