answer the 5 questions from the article as paragraph
kad
Kaitsuka.9.7.18.pdf
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 3970-3979; doi:10.3390/ijms16023970
International Journal of
Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Review
Regulation of Translation Factor EEF1D Gene Function by Alternative Splicing
Taku Kaitsuka 1 and Masayuki Matsushita 2,*
1 Department of Molecular Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University,
Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine,
University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected];
Tel.: +81-98-895-1106; Fax: +81-98-895-1402.
Academic Editor: Akila Mayeda
Received: 19 December 2014 / Accepted: 4 February 2015 / Published: 12 February 2015
Abstract: Alternative splicing is an exquisite mechanism that allows one coding gene
to have multiple functions. The alternative splicing machinery is necessary for proper
development, differentiation and stress responses in a variety of organisms, and disruption
of this machinery is often implicated in human diseases. Previously, we discovered a long
form of eukaryotic elongation factor 1Bδ (eEF1Bδ; this long-form eEF1Bδ results from
alternative splicing of EEF1D transcripts and regulates the cellular stress response by
transcriptional activation, not translational enhancement, of heat-shock responsive genes.
In this review, we discuss the molecular function of EEF1D alternative splicing products and
the estimated implication of human diseases.
Keywords: elongation factor; alternative splicing; heat shock; stress response
1. Introduction
In mammals, individual coding genes can generate diverse RNA variants because of alternative
splicing. Alternative splicing and the resulting RNA variants can have crucial roles in development,
differentiation and stress responses [1,2]. The mammalian brain expresses numerous RNA variants from
individual genes [3] via alternative splicing; moreover, related RNA variants from a single gene can
OPEN ACCESS
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3971
participate in neuronal development and neurodegenerative diseases [4]. Previously, we discovered that
EEF1D, a gene encoding eukaryotic elongation factor 1Bδ (eEF1Bδ), gives rise to a long-form EEF1D
transcript variant, specifically in brain and testis, because of alternative splicing [5]. Furthermore,
long-form EEF1D transcripts give rise to a translation product (designated eEF1BδL) that functions as
a transcription factor; therefore, eEF1BδL function (transcriptional activation) differs critically from
eEF1Bδ function (translational elongation).
2. EEF1D Gene Structure and EEF1D Homologs
The EEF1D gene is located on chromosome 8 in humans and on chromosome 15 in mice.
In humans, the EEF1D gene gives rise to four protein isoforms, which are designated isoform 1, 2, 4 or
5 in gene-centered information at NCBI (Gene ID 1936). These isoforms can be divided into two types
based on polypeptide length. One type includes only one long isoform with 647 aa, which is designated
isoform 1 in protein-centered information at NCBI (Accession Number NP_115754), named eEF1BδL
(Figure 1) [5]. Another type includes three short isoforms, each called eEF1Bδ and comprising 281, 257
or 262 aa; these proteins are designated isoform 2, 4 or 5, respectively, in protein-centered information at
NCBI (Accession Number NP_001951, NP_001123528, NP_001182132, respectively) [6]. The canonical
eEF1Bδ protein was initially isolated from Xenopus oocytes [7] and secondarily characterized in
humans [8]. This eEF1Bδ protein mainly localizes in cytoplasm and acts as a translation elongation
factor. This protein has a leucine-zipper motif (Figure 2) and forms a complex with eEF1Bα, eEF1Bγ
and valine-tRNA synthetase; this complex catalyzes the exchange of guanosine 5'-diphosphate, which
binds to G-protein eEF1A in the elongation cycle. Thus, eEF1Bδ functions as a guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) for eEF1A [6,9,10]. By contrast, eEF1BδL localizes in cytoplasm and nuclei
under basal conditions and acts as a transcription factor for genes that contain heat-shock elements
(HSEs) [5]. Human eEF1BδL has 367 more aa at its N-terminus than does eEF1Bδ, and this N-terminal
eEF1BδL sequence contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Figure 2). Furthermore, we found
that: (1) eEF1BδL induces HSPA6, CRYAB, DNAJB1 and HMOX1 transcription in cooperation with
heat-shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) and NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2); (2) eEF1BδL binds directly
to HSE oligo DNA in vitro and associates with the HSE consensus in the HMOX1 promoter region
in vivo; (3) heat shock induces the splicing-dependent change from eEF1Bδ to eEF1BδL expression;
and (4) translocation of eEF1BδL into the nucleus is facilitated by treatment with the protease
inhibitor, MG132.
Canonical eEF1Bδ is expressed in almost all metazoan species tested, including worm and human,
and these metazoan eEF1Bδ orthologs are highly homologous by 65% (gi|25453472 vs. gi|71997105).
In contrast, the expression of eEF1BL is restricted to mammals and avians [11] (Figure 3).
Xenopus tropicalis, Danio rerio, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans do not express
eEF1BδL (Figure 3). The C-terminal region of eEF1BδL, i.e., canonical eEF1Bδ, is highly conserved
from worm to human, especially the leucine-zipper motif and GEF domain. The nuclear localization
signals in the N-terminal region of eEF1BδL orthologs are highly conserved from rat to human (Figure 3).
Thus, eEF1BδL may have emerged in the lineage leading from reptiles to avians and mammals. Two
interesting structural features are apparent in the N-terminal region. First, the highly-conserved leucine-rich
zipper-like region at aa 184–225 of human eEF1BδL suggests a protein interaction domain. Second,
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3972
the basic region at aa 272–294 suggests a DNA binding domain, although the functional significance of
both regions is unclear at present.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the EEF1D gene and protein products. Short- or
long-isoform eEF1Bδ mRNA is expressed, depending on whether exon III is skipped.
eEF1Bδ functions as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A and has a crucial role
in translation fidelity; eEF1BδL functions as a transcription factor for HSE-containing genes.
The numbers of amino acids are shown. Asterisks indicate start or stop codons. eEF1Bδ,
eukaryotic elongation factor 1Bδ; eEF1BδL, long isoform of eEF1Bδ; HSE, heat-shock
element; mRNA, messenger RNA.
Figure 2. Comparison of eEF1BδL structural domains between human and rodent orthologs.
The nuclear localization signal (NLS), leucine-zipper motif and guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) domain are well conserved between human and rodent orthologs.
The numbers of amino acids are shown.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3973
Figure 3. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of mammalian eEF1BδL and other
eukaryotic eEF1Bδ proteins. Within the compared sequences, the blue highlights show
primary conserved regions, and the gray highlights show secondary conserved regions.
Arrows indicate each N-terminus of the mammalian eEF1BδL and other eukaryotic eEF1Bδ
proteins. The nuclear localization signal (NLS), leucine-zipper motif and guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) domain are marked by boxes and text. MUSCLE was used to create
the alignment [12].
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3974
Furthermore, eEF1BδL RNA and eEF1BδL protein are enriched in brain and testis [5]. Alternative splicing has important roles in the control of neuronal gene expression, neuronal development and
synaptic strength [13,14]. For instance, the Dscam gene regulates the formation of the neuronal circuit
by alternative splicing machinery [15], and neurexin splice variants are involved in synapse
formation [16]. Ca2+-channels, including the Cav2, channel are also regulated by alternative splicing in
neuronal tissues [17]. Thus, EEF1D expression was newly discovered to be regulated by brain- and
testis-specific alternative splicing.
3. eEF1BδL Target Genes
eEF1BδL can localize to nuclei and induce HSE-containing genes, such as HSPA6, DNAJB1, CRYAB
and HMOX1, in cooperation with HSF1 and Nrf2 [5]. HSPA6, also known as HSP70B’, is a HSP70
family member. HSPA6 is a strictly stress-inducible gene, and this expression is undetectable in most
cells under non-stressed conditions [18,19]. Interestingly, orthologs of the human HSPA6 gene are found
in Bos taurus, but not in rodents or lower species [20]. HSPA6 is induced by heat shock and proteasome
inhibition [20,21] and contributes to cell survival under conditions of stress [20,21]. CRYAB, also
known as HSPB5, is also a heat-shock-responsive gene, and the protein product has a chaperone-like
activity [22]. DNAJB1 is a major Hsp40 member that regulates Hsp70 in mammalian cytosol [23],
and the DNAJB1 protein product reportedly suppresses polyglutamine toxicity [24]. Transcription
of HMOX1 is activated by many transcription factors that regulate cellular stress responses; these
transcription factors include HSF family members, Nrf2, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and activator
protein-1 (AP-1) [25]. The HMOX1 protein product, HO-1, is an enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting
reaction in heme catabolism; consequently, HO-1 has cytoprotective activity against oxidative stress [25].
Almost all eEF1BδL target genes are responsive to heat shock or some other stress, and these are
cytoprotective genes to ameliorate protein aggregation and oxidative insult.
4. The Role of eEF1Bδ and eEF1BδL in Stress Response
The activity of eEF1BδL is modulated by some stress responses, including the unfolded-protein
response. The splicing-dependent switch from eEF1Bδ to eEF1BδL expression is induced by heat
shock [5]. Gene transcription and mRNA translation are responsive to various stresses. In the case of
mRNA translation, repression of the translation machinery often occurs as an adaptation to a number of
stresses, such as thermal stress or hypoxic stress; therefore, mRNA translation factors are important in
stress responses and human diseases [26–29]. Such stresses trigger the phosphorylation of eukaryotic
initiation factor eIF2α at Ser51 [26,28,30,31]. This inhibits the exchange of GDP for GTP on the eIF2
complex and prevents the formation of the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNAiMet ternary complex [30,31]. Hypoxic
stress and energy starvation also activate AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), and activated AMPK
phosphorylates eEF2 kinase (eEF2K) at Ser398 and activates its kinase activity [32,33]. eEF2K then
phosphorylates eEF2 at Thr56, resulting in the inhibition of peptide elongation [34]. Repression of
translation results in a substantial saving of cellular energy, which is mainly consumed in the process
of translation [26,35–37]; this prevents the synthesis of unwanted proteins and, therefore, protects cells
by reducing the toxicity caused by unfolded proteins [29]. Loss or inactivation of eEF1B, eIF4E or
aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases, which each regulate mRNA translation, enhances a cell’s
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3975
resistance to stress [27,29,38]. Additionally, various stresses can elicit the activation of specific
transcription factors, which then induce stress-response genes and rescue a cell; such transcription
factors include HSF1 [39], Nrf2 [40] and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [41]. In our work, heat shock
reduced eEF1Bδ expression, but it simultaneously increased eEF1BδL expression in a splicing-dependent
manner. Taken together, these finding indicate that one coding gene, EEF1D, would participate in
regulating two stress-response mechanisms: generalized translational repression and transcriptional
activation of stress-response genes. Furthermore, eEF1BδL activity is also regulated via translocation
from the cytoplasm to the nucleus by MG132, causing the accumulation of unfolded proteins [5].
eEF1BδL contains a canonical eEF1Bδ sequence at its C-terminal region, and this region is necessary
to support the transcriptional activity of its protein [5]. To examine whether canonical eEF1Bδ has the
potential to activate the transcription of the HSE-containing genes, we constructed a plasmid vector
expressing eEF1Bδ fused to NLS. Overexpression of NLS-eEF1Bδ did not induce HMOX1 expression
in HEK293 cells (unpublished data), indicating that the N-terminal region of eEF1BδL is also essential
for the transcriptional activity of eEF1BδL. Canonical eEF1Bδ has a leucine zipper motif and forms
a macromolecular complex with eEF1Bα, eEF1Bγ and valine-tRNA synthetase [6]. Therefore, it is
possible that eEF1BδL also forms a complex with these subunits of elongation factors or with other
proteins in the nucleus. While it is unclear whether eEF1BδL has GEF activity for eEF1A and
participates in mRNA translation, further study is needed to clarify this question.
5. A Putative Role for eEF1BδL in Vivo
Most HSE-containing genes, especially those encoding heat shock proteins (Hsps), code for
molecular chaperones that were originally defined because of an HSF1-dependent increase in expression
in response to cellular stressors, such as thermal and oxidative stress [39,42]. Molecular chaperones have
essential roles in protein homeostasis, prevent misfolding and aggregation of proteins and allow the
clearance of damaged proteins [43,44]. Members of the HSF family are the transcription factors mainly
responsible for Hsps induction. In response to various inducers, such as heat shock, most HSFs acquire
DNA binding activity and bind to HSEs, thereby inducing the transcription of genes encoding
Hsps [39,45–47]. Among the family of HSFs (i.e., murine and human HSF1, 2 and 4), HSF1 is an HSF
prototype and a prime integrator of transcriptional responses during stress [47,48]. Hsf1-knockout mice
and cell models reveal that HSF1 is a prerequisite for the transactivation of Hsp genes, the maintenance
of cellular integrity during stress and the development of thermotolerance [49]. Hsf1-knockout mice also
reveal that maternal HSF1 regulates embryo development [50], postnatal inflammatory responses [51]
and carcinogenesis [52]. However, the HSF1 response to cellular stresses is absent in mature neurons in
the adult brain [43]; this finding indicates that other machinery is required for Hsps expression in
these adult neural tissues; such machinery may include eEF1BδL. Protein misfolding in neuronal tissues
is implicated in Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and
Alzheimer’s disease [43,53]. eEF1BδL is specifically expressed in the brain, indicating the possibility that
this protein could participate in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Nrf2, which is a basic leucine-zipper
transcription factor, plays a crucial role in the inducible cell defense system. During chemical exposure
and/or oxidative stress, Nrf2 activates the transcription of cytoprotective genes [40,54]. Oxidative
stress-response pathways are implicated as a major cause of brain stroke and some other neurodegenerative
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3976
diseases, such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases [54]. eEF1BδL and Nrf2 interact with each other
in the promoter of a shared target gene, HMOX1 [5]; these findings also indicate the possibility that
eEF1BδL could correlate with brain stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, rare variants
in EEF1D gene were found in late-onset familial Parkinson’s diseases [55], supporting a possible
correlation between EEF1D and the pathogenesis of this disease. In the case of testis, Hsfs, especially
Hsf2, is also essential for spermatogenesis and male fertility [56–58]. Notably, the strong expression of
eEF1BδL in human testis indicates the possibility that eEF1BδL has a role in male fertility.
6. Conclusions
As discussed, the expression of eEF1BδL might be taxonomically restricted to avians and mammals,
suggesting that the regulation of EEF1D gene expression by alternative splicing is an avian- and
mammalian-specific phenomenon. The orthologs of eEF1BδL are not found in reptiles or lower species.
Furthermore, higher expression is detected in the cerebrum and cerebellum. We propose that evolution
from reptiles to avians and mammals may have required additional proteins that could regulate protein
homeostasis in the brain because of the substantial change in brain structure and function in the avian
and mammalian lineage. Further study involving knockout mice and human clinical specimens is needed
to clarify the role of eEF1BδL in normal mammalian physiology and pathophysiology.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from a Special Account Budget for Education and Research
within the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
Author Contributions
Taku Kaitsuka and Masayuki Matsushita wrote the manuscript; Taku Kaitsuka performed experiments
on this research; Masayuki Matsushita supervised.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Kalsotra, A.; Cooper, T.A. Functional consequences of developmentally regulated alternative splicing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 715–729.
2. Chen, M.; Manley, J.L. Mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation: Insights from molecular and genomics approaches. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 741–754.
3. Wang, E.T.; Sandberg, R.; Luo, S.; Khrebtukova, I.; Zhang, L.; Mayr, C.; Kingsmore, S.F.; Schroth, G.P.; Burge, C.B. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature
2008, 456, 470–476.
4. Licatalosi, D.D.; Darnell, R.B. RNA processing and its regulation: Global insights into biological networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 75–87.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3977
5. Kaitsuka, T.; Tomizawa, K.; Matsushita, M. Transformation of eEF1Bδ into heat-shock response transcription factor by alternative splicing. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12, 673–681.
6. Le Sourd, F.; Boulben, S.; le Bouffant, R.; Cormier, P.; Morales, J.; Belle, R.; Mulner-Lorillon, O. eEF1B: At the dawn of the 21st century. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1759, 13–31.
7. Morales, J.; Cormier, P.; Mulner-Lorillon, O.; Poulhe, R.; Bellé, R. Molecular cloning of a new guanine nucleotide-exchange protein, EF1δ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 4091.
8. Sanders, J.; Raggiaschi, R.; Morales, J.; Möller, W. The human leucine zipper-containing guanine-nucleotide exchange protein elongation factor-1δ. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1174, 87–90.
9. Andersen, G.R.; Nissen, P.; Nyborg, J. Elongation factors in protein biosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 434–441.
10. Browne, G.J.; Proud, C.G. Regulation of peptide-chain elongation in mammalian cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 5360–5368.
11. Merkin, J.; Russell, C.; Chen, P.; Burge, C.B. Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science 2012, 338, 1593–1599.
12. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797.
13. Ule, J.; Darnell, R.B. RNA binding proteins and the regulation of neuronal synaptic plasticity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16, 102–110.
14. Li, Q.; Lee J.A.; Black, D.L. Neuronal regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 819–831.
15. Hattori, D.; Millard, S.S.; Wojtowicz, W.M.; Zipursky, S.L. Dscam-mediated cell recognition regulates neural circuit formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24, 597–620.
16. Treutlein, B.; Gokce, O.; Quake, S.R.; Südhof, T.C. Cartography of neurexin alternative splicing mapped by single-molecule long-read mRNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111,
E1291–E1299.
17. Simms, B.A.; Zamponi, G.W. Neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels: Structure, function, and dysfunction. Neuron 2014, 82, 24–45.
18. Leung, T.K.; Rajendran, M.Y.; Monfries, C.; Hall, C.; Lim, L. The human heat-shock protein family. Expression of a novel heat-inducible HSP70 (HSP70B) and isolation of its cDNA and genomic
DNA. Biochem. J. 1990, 267, 125–132.
19. Parsian, A.J.; Sheren, J.E.; Tao, T.Y.; Goswami, P.C.; Malyapa, R.; van Rheeden, R.; Watson, M.S.; Hunt, C.R. The human hsp70B gene at the HSPA7 locus of chromosome 1 is transcribed but
nonfunctional. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1494, 201–205.
20. Noonan, E.J.; Place, R.F.; Giardina, C.; Hightower, L.E. Hsp70B' regulation and function. Cell Stress Chaperones 2007, 12, 393–402.
21. Noonan, E.; Giardina, C.; Hightower, L. Hsp70B' and Hsp72 form a complex in stressed human colon cells and each contributes to cytoprotection. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 2468–2476.
22. Sax, C.M.; Piatigorsky, J. Expression of the α-crystallin/small heat shock protein/molecular chaperone genes in the lens and other tissues. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1994, 69, 155–201.
23. Kelley, W.L. The J-domain family and the recruitment of chaperone power. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23, 222–227.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3978
24. Kazemi-Esfarjani, P.; Benzer, S. Genetic suppression of polyglutamine toxicity in Drosophila. Science 2000, 287, 1837–1840.
25. Alam, J.; Cook, J.L. How many transcription factors does it take to turn on the heme oxygenase-1 gene? Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007, 36, 166–174.
26. Holcik, M.; Sonenberg, N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 318–327.
27. Tettweiler, G.; Miron, M.; Jenkins, M.; Sonenberg, N.; Lasko, P.F. Starvation and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila are mediated through the eIF4E-binding protein, d4E-BP. Genes Dev. 2005,
19, 1840–1843.
28. Scheper, G.C.; van der Knaap, M.S.; Proud, C.G. Translation matters: Protein synthesis defects in inherited disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 711–723.
29. Anderson, L.L.; Mao, X.; Scott, B.A.; Crowder, C.M. Survival from hypoxia in C. elegans by inactivation of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Science 2009, 323, 630–633.
30. Hinnebusch, A.G. Mechanism and regulation of methionyl-tRNA binding to ribosomes. In Translational Control of Gene Expression; Sonenberg, N., Hershey, J.W.B., Mathews, M.B., Eds.;
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: New York, NY, USA, 2000;
pp. 185–243.
31. Proud, C.G. eIF2 and the control of cell physiology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 16, 3–12. 32. Liu, L.; Cash, T.P.; Jones, R.G.; Keith, B.; Thompson, C.B.; Simon, M.C. Hypoxia-induced energy
stress regulates mRNA translation and cell growth. Mol. Cell 2006, 21, 521–531.
33. Browne, G.J.; Finn, S.G.; Proud, C.G. Stimulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase leads to activation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase and to its phosphorylation at a novel site, serine
398. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 12220–12231.
34. Patel, J.; McLeod, L.E.; Vries, R.G.; Flynn, A.; Wang, X.; Proud, C.G. Cellular stresses profoundly inhibit protein synthesis and modulate the states of phosphorylation of multiple translation factors.
Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 3076–3085.
35. Proud, C.G. Regulation of mammalian translation factors by nutrients. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 5338–5349.
36. Rolfe, D.F.; Brown, G.C. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol. Rev. 1997, 77, 731–758.
37. Buttgereit, F.; Brand, M.D. A hierarchy of ATP-consuming processes in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 1995, 312, 163–167.
38. Olarewaju, O.; Ortiz, P.A.; Chowdhury, W.Q.; Chatterjee, I.; Kinzy, T.G. The translation elongation factor eEF1B plays a role in the oxidative stress response pathway. RNA Biol. 2004, 1, 89–94.
39. Morimoto, R.I. Regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response: Cross talk between a family of heat shock factors, molecular chaperones, and negative regulators. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 3788–3796.
40. Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M. Nrf2-Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. Trends Mol. Med. 2004, 10, 549–557.
41. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1 and human disease: One highly involved factor. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1983–1991. 42. Jacquier-Sarlin, M.R.; Polla, B.S. Dual regulation of heat-shock transcription factor (HSF) activation
and DNA-binding activity by H2O2: Role of thioredoxin. Biochem. J. 1996, 318, 187–193.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 3979
43. Morimoto, R.I. Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1427–1438.
44. Bukau, B.; Weissman, J.; Horwich, A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell 2006, 125, 443–451.
45. Wu, C. Heat shock transcription factors: Structure and regulation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1995, 11, 441–469.
46. Morano, K.A.; Thiele, D.J. Heat shock factor function and regulation in response to cellular stress, growth, and differentiation signals. Gene Expr. 1999, 7, 271–282.
47. Pirkkala, L.; Nykänen, P.; Sistonen, L. Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 1118–1131.
48. Vihervaara, A.; Sistonen, L. HSF1 at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 261–266. 49. Akerfelt, M.; Morimoto, R.I.; Sistonen, L. Heat shock factors: Integrators of cell stress, development
and lifespan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 545–555.
50. Christians, E.; Davis, A.A.; Thomas, S.D.; Benjamin, I.J. Embryonic development: Maternal effect of hsf1 on reproductive success. Nature 2000, 407, 693–694.
51. Xiao, X.; Zuo, X.; Davis, A.A.; McMillan, D.R.; Curry, B.B.; Richardson, J.A.; Benjamin, I.J. HSF1 is required for extra-embryonic development, postnatal growth and protection during inflammatory
responses in mice. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 5943–5952.
52. Dai, C.; Whitesell, L.; Rogers, A.B.; Lindquist, S. Heat shock factor 1 is a powerful multifaceted modifier of carcinogenesis. Cell 2007, 130, 1005–1018.
53. Neef, D.W.; Jaeger, A.M.; Thiele, D.J. Heat shock transcription factor 1 as a therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 930–944.
54. Suzuki, T.; Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M. Toward clinical application of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 34, 340–346.
55. Schulte, E.C.; Ellwanger, D.C.; Dihanich, S.; Manzoni, C.; Stangl, K.; Schormair, B.; Graf, E.; Eck, S.; Mollenhauer, B.; Haubenberger, D.; et al. Rare variants in LRRK1 and Parkinson’s disease.
Neurogenetics 2014, 15, 49–57.
56. Kallio, M.; Chang, Y.; Manuel, M.; Alastalo, T.P.; Rallu, M.; Gitton, Y.; Pirkkala, L.; Loones, M.T.; Paslaru, L.; Larney, S.; et al. Brain abnormalities, defective meiotic chromosome synapsis and
female subfertility in HSF2 null mice. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 2591–2601.
57. Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; Moskophidis, D.; Mivechi, N.F. Targeted disruption of the heat shock transcription factor (hsf)-2 gene results in increased embryonic lethality, neuronal defects, and
reduced spermatogenesis. Genesis 2003, 36, 48–61.
58. Wang, G.; Ying, Z.; Jin, X.; Tu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Phillips, M.; Moskophidis, D.; Mivechi, N.F. Essential requirement for both hsf1 and hsf2 transcriptional activity in spermatogenesis and male
fertility. Genesis 2004, 38, 66–80.
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
