Preparedness & Disaster Mgmt
Instructions
| Hospital Preparedness Program | Hospital Preparedness Program | |||||||||
| INSTRUCTIONS: | Issues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to: | |||||||||
| 1 | Status of current plans | |||||||||
| Evaluate potential for event and response among the following categories using | 2 | Frequency of drills | ||||||||
| the hazard specific scale. Assume each event incident occurs at the worst | 3 | Training status | ||||||||
| possible time (e.g. during peak patient loads). | 4 | Insurance | ||||||||
| 5 | Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/services | |||||||||
| Please note specific score criteria on each work sheet to ensure accurate recording. | ||||||||||
| Issues to consider for probability include, but are not limited to: | Issues to consider for internal resources include, but are not limited to: | |||||||||
| 1 | Known risk | 1 | Types of supplies on hand/will they meet need? | |||||||
| 2 | Historical data | 2 | Volume of supplies on hand/will they meet need? | |||||||
| 3 | Manufacturer/vendor statistics | 3 | Staff availability | |||||||
| 4 | Coordination with MOB's | |||||||||
| Issues to consider for response include, but are not limited to: | 5 | Availability of back-up systems | ||||||||
| 1 | Time to marshal an on-scene response | 6 | Internal resources ability to withstand disasters/survivability | |||||||
| 2 | Scope of response capability | |||||||||
| 3 | Historical evaluation of response success | Issues to consider for external resources include, but are not limited to: | ||||||||
| 1 | Types of agreements with community agencies/drills? | |||||||||
| Issues to consider for human impact include, but are not limited to: | 2 | Coordination with local and state agencies | ||||||||
| 1 | Potential for staff death or injury | 3 | Coordination with proximal health care facilities | |||||||
| 2 | Potential for patient death or injury | 4 | Coordination with treatment specific facilities | |||||||
| 5 | Community resources | |||||||||
| Issues to consider for property impact include, but are not limited to: | ||||||||||
| 1 | Cost to replace | Complete all worksheets including Natural, Technological, Human and Hazmat. | ||||||||
| 2 | Cost to set up temporary replacement | The summary section will automatically provide our specific and overall relative threat. | ||||||||
| 3 | Cost to repair | |||||||||
| 4 | Time to recover | |||||||||
| Issues to consider for business impact include, but are not limited to: | ||||||||||
| 1 | Business interruption | |||||||||
| 2 | Employees unable to report to work | |||||||||
| 3 | Customers unable to reach facility | |||||||||
| 4 | Company in violation of contractual agreements | |||||||||
| 5 | Imposition of fines and penalties or legal costs | |||||||||
| 6 | Interruption of critical supplies | |||||||||
| 7 | Interruption of product distribution | |||||||||
| 8 | Reputation and public image | |||||||||
| 9 | Financial impact/burden |
&L&8© 2001 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.&R&"Arial,Italic"&8&F
Natural Hazards
| HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL | ||||||||
| NATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTS | ||||||||
| SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION) | ||||||||
| EVENT | PROBABILITY | HUMAN IMPACT | PROPERTY IMPACT | BUSINESS IMPACT | PREPARED-NESS | INTERNAL RESPONSE | EXTERNAL RESPONSE | RISK |
| Likelihood this will occur | Possibility of death or injury | Physical losses and damages | Interuption of services | Preplanning | Time, effectivness, resouces | Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies | Relative threat* | |
| SCORE | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 - 100% |
| Hurricane | 0% | |||||||
| Tornado | 0% | |||||||
| Severe Thunderstorm | 0% | |||||||
| Snow Fall | 0% | |||||||
| Blizzard | ||||||||
| Ice Storm | 0% | |||||||
| Earthquake | ||||||||
| Tidal Wave | ||||||||
| Temperature Extremes | 0% | |||||||
| Drought | 0% | |||||||
| Flood, External | 0% | |||||||
| Wild Fire | 0% | |||||||
| Landslide | ||||||||
| Volcano | ||||||||
| Epidemic | 0% | |||||||
| AVERAGE SCORE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| *Threat increases with percentage. | ||||||||
| 0 | RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY | |||||||
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
&C
&RPage 1]
Technological Hazards
| HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL | ||||||||
| TECHNOLOGIC EVENTS | ||||||||
| SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION) | ||||||||
| EVENT | PROBABILITY | HUMAN IMPACT | PROPERTY IMPACT | BUSINESS IMPACT | PREPARED-NESS | INTERNAL RESPONSE | EXTERNAL RESPONSE | RISK |
| Likelihood this will occur | Possibility of death or injury | Physical losses and damages | Interuption of services | Preplanning | Time, effectivness, resouces | Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies | Relative threat* | |
| SCORE | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 - 100% |
| Electrical Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Generator Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Transportation Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Fuel Shortage | 0% | |||||||
| Natural Gas Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Water Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Sewer Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Steam Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Fire Alarm Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Communications Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Medical Gas Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Medical Vacuum Failure | 0% | |||||||
| HVAC Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Information Systems Failure | 0% | |||||||
| Fire, Internal | 0% | |||||||
| Flood, Internal | 0% | |||||||
| Hazmat Exposure, Internal | 0% | |||||||
| Supply Shortage | 0% | |||||||
| Structural Damage | 0% | |||||||
| AVERAGE SCORE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| *Threat increases with percentage. | ||||||||
| 0 | RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY | |||||||
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
&C
&RPage 2
Human Hazards
| HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL | ||||||||
| HUMAN RELATED EVENTS | ||||||||
| SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION) | ||||||||
| EVENT | PROBABILITY | HUMAN IMPACT | PROPERTY IMPACT | BUSINESS IMPACT | PREPARED-NESS | INTERNAL RESPONSE | EXTERNAL RESPONSE | RISK |
| Likelihood this will occur | Possibility of death or injury | Physical losses and damages | Interuption of services | Preplanning | Time, effectivness, resouces | Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies | Relative threat* | |
| SCORE | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 - 100% |
| Mass Casualty Incident (trauma) | 0% | |||||||
| Mass Casualty Incident (medical/infectious) | 0% | |||||||
| Terrorism, Biological | 0% | |||||||
| VIP Situation | 0% | |||||||
| Infant Abduction | 0% | |||||||
| Hostage Situation | 0% | |||||||
| Civil Disturbance | 0% | |||||||
| Labor Action | 0% | |||||||
| Forensic Admission | 0% | |||||||
| Bomb Threat | 0% | |||||||
| AVERAGE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| *Threat increases with percentage. | ||||||||
| 0 | RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY | |||||||
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
&C &RPage 3
Hazardous Materials
| HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL | ||||||||
| EVENTS INVOLVING HAZARDOUS MATERIALS | ||||||||
| SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE - MITIGATION) | ||||||||
| EVENT | PROBABILITY | HUMAN IMPACT | PROPERTY IMPACT | BUSINESS IMPACT | PREPARED-NESS | INTERNAL RESPONSE | EXTERNAL RESPONSE | RISK |
| Likelihood this will occur | Possibility of death or injury | Physical losses and damages | Interuption of services | Preplanning | Time, effectivness, resouces | Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies | Relative threat* | |
| SCORE | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none | 0 - 100% |
| Mass Casualty Hazmat Incident (>= 5 victims) | 0% | |||||||
| Small Casualty Hazmat Incident (with < 5 victims) | 0% | |||||||
| Chemical Exposure, External | 0% | |||||||
| Small-Medium Sized Internal Spill | 0% | |||||||
| Large Internal Spill | 0% | |||||||
| Terrorism, Chemical | 0% | |||||||
| Radiologic Exposure, Internal | 0% | |||||||
| Radiologic Exposure, External | 0% | |||||||
| Terrorism, Radiologic | 0% | |||||||
| AVERAGE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| *Threat increases with percentage. | ||||||||
| 0 | RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY | |||||||
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
&RPage 4
Summary
| SUMMARY OF HAZARDS ANALYSIS | |||||
| Natural | Technological | Human | Hazmat | Total for Facility | |
| Probability | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Severity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hazard Specific Relative Risk: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Copy to OEM | Date |
&RPage 5
Summary
Hazard Specific Relative Risk
Priorities & Measures
&F
Relative Impact on Facility
Probability and Severity of Hazards to East Texas Gulf Coast Region
| Priorities | |||
| Epidemic | Hurricanes/Floods w/associated utility failure | chemical/hazmat | |
| Mitigation | handwashing and cough hygeine at healthcare facilities staff education, work with public health officials to educate public, develop strategies for surge capacity | Generators, fuel contracts, facility hardening, staffing plans, utility redundancy | All facilities have decon equipment and trained personnel. Early notification systems and relationships with local refineries. |
| Preparedness | Education, signage, development of RACS system for surge capacity. Facilities to have redundant supply vendors and initial stockpile of supplies/medications. Develop staff plans for decreased workforce/increase patient demand | Redundant vendors, evacuation/shelter in place plans, regional coordination, identification of resources to include transportation assets. | Regular decon training and exercises. Meetings with local LEPC and refinery officials |
| Response | Work with public health, OEM and CMOC for surge capacity, alternate care sites, and patient load sharing | Work with local OEM, EMS and regional jurisdictions to coordinate response and resources/requests | Preserve facility and staff from contamination, provide rapid and effective decontamination capabilities to prevent death and further injury. |
| Recovery | Return to normal operating procedures | Return to normal operating procedures | Return to normal operating procedures |
| Measures |
&RPage 6