marketing

profileyvrvp123
JyotiMerugu1.xlsx

MRKT20052 Assessment 2

MRKT20052
Term 1 2018
Assessment 2: Marketing Plan
Assessment criteria: 40%
Student name: Jyoti Merugu
Student ID: 12068301
Campus: Melbourne
Marks out of 40 6.552
Comments Mark Total for Criteria
Content (80%)
1. Title page Okay - not as professional as it could be. 0.125 0.25
2. Executive summary Too brief. The purpose of an executive summary is to provide a comprehensive overview of the whole report. 0.1 2
3. Table of contents Very good. 0.25 0.25
4. Introduction The introduction needs to present the purpose, scope and limitations of the report. 0.4 2
5. Situation analysis recap Too brief and this section lacked references. What about the customer base? 0.3 3
6. Problem statement Did not present a problem and opportunities statement. 0 5
7. Potential market segments SWOT analysis was too brief and lacked justification. No potential market segments were identified. 0 10
8. Target market positioning You didn't address this criterion. You needed to develop a positioning statement for each target market identified earlier. What you presented here were generalist statements available around the brand without adequate support. 0.1 10
9. Marketing Objectives and Goals You did not develop three SMART marketing objectives. So there is no way of knowing if anything has been achieved. 0.08 4
10. Financial Objectives and Goals You did not develop three SMART financial objectives. So there is no way of knowing if anything has been achieved. 0 3.5
11. Marketing Strategy and Marketing Mix You have not developed a marketing strategy to address the marketing and financial objectives. The marketing mix was then to be used to opertionalise the marketing strategy by creating tactics. 0 15
12. Implementation and Control It is not really possible to write a comprehensive implementation and control schedule for the marketing strategy. What you presented was inappropriate. 0 10
13. Promotion Mix Difficult to set a budget for activities in the marketing mix. 0 7.5
14.Conclusion Okay - given all of the issues within this report. 1.5 5
15.Academic References Good, but more in-text referencing needed. 1.625 2.5
Sub Total (Content) 4.48 80
Style (20%)
16.Referencing Format Not appropriately formatted in the reference list. 9 15
17.Report format Good, but take care when writing and keeping formatting consistent. 2.9 5
Sub Total (Presentation) 11.90 20
TOTAL 16.38 100
Marked by: Dr. Ann Mitsis
Date: 6/6/18