2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Draft of Preparing a Case
JUS 331 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric (Draft of Preparing a Case)
Overview: The juvenile justice system is truly unique compared to the adult offender system. Juvenile offenders have distinctive arrest and hearing procedures compared to adult offenders. It is important to understand the process and constitutional rights to effectively navigate the juvenile process as a law enforcement officer, a case manager, a judicial clerk, an attorney, a judge, or a probation officer. As a professional working in law enforcement at any level, it is critical to understand the procedures that control legal situations. A case study allows you to evaluate the situation with your course knowledge, regardless of your position in the juvenile justice system, and provides a hands- on approach with juvenile justice. In the case study, you will receive a specific fact pattern that involves the charging and the initial hearing process for a juvenile offender. You will assume the roles of an attorney and law enforcement officer in evaluating the juvenile offender’s rights during arrest, the hearing process, and the appropriate options available to enforce upon the juvenile offender. Prompt: Milestone One relates to the information you learned in Module One and Two about the roles of actors in juvenile cases as opposed to adult cases. A legal professionals’ due diligence includes doing research on an assigned case. Research can involve historical context as well as current standards and guidelines. Milestone One provides you an opportunity to conduct such research. For this milestone, you will submit a draft of the Final Project section Preparing a Case. Case Study
Jack and Diane are each 13 years old and are best friends. On September 12, 2012, Jack asked Diane to meet at Moe’s Convenience Store. While in the store, Jack
steals three packs of gum and a candy bar. Jack hands Diane two boxes of candy to place in her purse. Diane places the candy in her purse. The store owner, Moe,
notices Diane place items in her purse. As Jack and Diane exit the store, Moe calls their names and runs after them. Jack pushes Moe to the ground and exits with
Diane.
Moe calls the police and reports the theft. The police apprehend Jack and Diane a few blocks away from the store. The police only retrieve the boxes of candy
from Diane but not the packs of gum nor the candy bar taken by Jack. The police escort Jack and Diane to the police station where they question them for two
hours regarding the theft. Diane confesses her and Jack’s role in the theft. Jack denies any wrongdoing. The police charge Jack and Diane with theft and also
charge Jack with simple assault. Their hearings are within the state mandated time after they are petitioned to appear in the local juvenile court.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Preparing a Case
A. What information would you want to know as a sentencing judge in Jack and Diane’s case? Provide a rationale for each choice.
B. Explain how Jack and Diane will be treated as juvenile offenders as compared to adult offenders. Why?
C. Why is it important to treat juveniles who commit offenses differently than adults?
D. Describe how juveniles who commit offenses have historically been treated differently than adults. Why has this view evolved? Explain the due
process rights afforded to Jack and Diane during the hearing process. Provide rationale for the evolution of the due process rights.
E. Determine possible court-ordered options for Jack and Diane, defending your response.
Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one‐ to two‐page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12‐point Times New Roman font, one‐inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Preparing a Case: Sentencing Judge
Determines what information a sentencing judge would want to know about Jack and Diane’s case, and provides rationales for each choice
Determines what information a sentencing judge would want to know about Jack and Diane’s case, but does not provide rationales for each choice
Does not determine information a sentencing judge would want to know
15
Preparing a Case: Juvenile Offenders
Explains how Jack and Diane will be treated as juvenile offenders as compared to adult offenders, and explains why
Explains how Jack and Diane will be treated as juvenile offenders as compared to adult offenders, but does not explain why
Does not explain how Jack and Diane will be treated
15
Preparing a Case: Juveniles Describes how juveniles who commit crimes are treated differently than adults, including why it is important to treat juveniles differently
Describes how juveniles who commit crimes have been treated differently than adults, but does not include why it is important to treat juveniles differently
Does not describe how juveniles who commit crimes are treated differently
15
Preparing a Case: Historical Treatment of Juveniles
Describes how juveniles who commit crimes are treated differently than adults, including why the view has evolved over time
Describes how juveniles who commit crimes are treated differently than adults, but does not include why the view has evolved over time
Does not describe how juveniles who commit crimes have historically treated differently
15
Preparing a Case: Due Process Rights
Explains the due process rights afforded to Jack and Diane during the hearing process and provides rationale for the evolution of the due process rights
Explains the due process rights afforded to Jack and Diane during the hearing process, but does not provide rationale for the evolution of the due process rights
Does not explain the due process rights afforded to Jack and Diane
15
Preparing a Case: Court-Ordered Options
Determines possible punishments for Jack and Diane, and defends response
Determines possible punishments for Jack and Diane, but does not defend response
Does not determine punishments available for Jack and Diane
15
Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%