G-POWER analysis

profileRakhi1234
Jukanti_U3.docx

Step A: Determine and Understand Statistical Power

[8] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 19:52:41

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.5152354

Critical t = 1.6603560

Df = 99.2225438

Sample size group 1 = 53

Sample size group 2 = 53

Total sample size = 106

Actual power = 0.8032180

[10] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 19:54:07

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.9

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.9519033

Critical t = 1.6560176

Df = 137.4197

Sample size group 1 = 73

Sample size group 2 = 73

Total sample size = 146

Actual power = 0.9019025

[7] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 19:49:09

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.95

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 3.3138635

Critical t = 1.6536729

Df = 173.7071

Sample size group 1 = 92

Sample size group 2 = 92

Total sample size = 184

Actual power = 0.9511454

How the sample size changed as the desired statistical power was increased. Describe the changes and how this influences the choice of a statistical power level for an apriori sample size determination.

Step B: Determine and Understand Statistical Significance

[12] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:08:43

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.5152354

Critical t = 1.6603560

Df = 99.2225438

Sample size group 1 = 53

Sample size group 2 = 53

Total sample size = 106

Actual power = 0.8032180

[13] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:09:41

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.01

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 3.2039809

Critical t = 2.3495505

Df = 162.2479

Sample size group 1 = 86

Sample size group 2 = 86

Total sample size = 172

Actual power = 0.8025758

[14] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:10:29

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.001

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 3.9844329

Critical t = 3.1228850

Df = 252.0113

Sample size group 1 = 133

Sample size group 2 = 133

Total sample size = 266

Actual power = 0.8041150

How the sample size changed as the statistical significance (Apha) was increased. Describe the changes and how this influences the choice of a statistical significance level for an apriori sample size determination.
Step C: Determine and Understand Effect Size

[15] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:17:24

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.2

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.4913937

Critical t = 1.6473202

Df = 618.7043

Sample size group 1 = 325

Sample size group 2 = 325

Total sample size = 650

Actual power = 0.8006136

[16] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:18:03

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.5

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.5152354

Critical t = 1.6603560

Df = 99.2225438

Sample size group 1 = 53

Sample size group 2 = 53

Total sample size = 106

Actual power = 0.8032180

[17] -- Tuesday, October 27, 2020 -- 20:18:52

t tests - Means: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (two groups)

Options: A.R.E. method

Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size

Input: Tail(s) = One

Parent distribution = Normal

Effect size d = 0.8

α err prob = 0.05

Power (1-β err prob) = 0.8

Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 1

Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2.5332049

Critical t = 1.6858361

Df = 38.1070457

Sample size group 1 = 21

Sample size group 2 = 21

Total sample size = 42

Actual power = 0.8003744

How the sample size changed as the effect level was increased. Describe the changes and how this influences the choice of an effect size for an apriori sample size determination.

Conclusion

References