1, Journal_Article, 2.Discussion with peer to peer responses.

Summary: Journal Article question

********Article should be not more than 3yrs old (Ex. 2020, 2019, 2018)

Summary:

Pick one of the following terms for your research: bounded rationality perspective, cognitive biases, decision learning, devil’s advocate, groupthink, incremental decision model, management science approach, nonprogrammer decisions, rational approach, or satisficing.

DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.

Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200-word range. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.

*********************

DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment.

REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format. (continued) Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required. Any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment. Organization

Imp*******

Discussion: 2

Discussions

Question: Explain the role of intuition in decision making.. (300 words +references)

Instructions:

A few general notes about these group discussions:

· Cite your source! (Not citing sources will result in deductions).

· The initial post and peer replies must be different! In other words, do not reuse your initial post for your peer replies.

· Provide concrete examples, perhaps from your own experience or cited from the reading

· Identify consequences or implications

· When completing peer replies, challenge something that has been posted – perhaps by playing devil’s advocate in a professional way

· Pose a related question or issue

· Suggest a different perspective or interpretation

· Pull in related information from other sources with proper citation – books, articles, websites, courses, etc.

· Please note that simply affirming the viewpoints of others does not contribute to online discussion so thus is not counted in relation to grading.

The TurnItIn program will be utilized for discussion posts. Student’s grades will be docked for TurnItIn similarity over 20%.

Topics for discussion will be found in each’s Module’s discussion assignment.

Each Module stands on its own. Thus, you cannot make-up points from a previous Module. Please make every effort to participate in all discussions.

The grading for each Discussion Forum will be broken into to two components. Up to 30 points can be received from the student’s answer to the initial discussion question and up to 20 points will be divided between the student’s two responses to their peers.

See the following Rubric for grading details:

Points	Discussion Posting Grading Rubric To Be Used to Grade Student’s Response to the Discussion Question
25-30	This posting will thoughtfully summarize and evaluate the case assigned, using sound arguments and clear prose. A stellar posting that will contain virtually no grammatical errors or typos. Not only will such a post engage with the ongoing conversation in a rhetorically suitable fashion, it will foster further discussion on the topic, perhaps exploring new lines of argument or different perspectives. This isn't just a response; it's proof that you are facilitating learning both for yourself and your fellow students. This posting corresponds to an A. The word count must be a minimum of 300 words.
20-25	This posting is a competent response to the subject: it's at least 250 to 300 words long, it addresses the question, without going into much detail, and it contributes to the overall conversation as another voice on the subject. This posting amounts to a B.
15-20	This posting responds to the subject. While it may be 200 to 250 words long, more or less, it addresses the question, but does not contribute to the overall conversation as another voice on the subject. This posting simply rehashes the thoughts of others, either the text or peers. It is possible this student read the answers of others to help them formulate their own response. This posting amounts to a C.
0-15	This posting reflects a less-than-adequate engagement with the subject, or is noticeably under the required word count. It does little to advance the discussion underway, and may even detract from it. – Or - No posting, late posting, or a post that is but the briefest nod toward a response

Points per response	Discussion Posting Grading Rubric To Be Used to Grade Student’s Response to Peers (two peer relies required)
5-10	Contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling errors. Demonstrates analysis of others’ posts; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts. This post is 50 - 100 words long. This posting corresponds to an A or B.
0-5	Communicates in friendly, courteous and helpful manner with some errors in clarity or mechanics. Posts shallow contribution to discussion (e.g., agrees or disagrees); does not enrich discussion. This posting amounts to a C. – Or - No posting or late posting or posts that are long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate. This posting amounts to a D or F.

Replay for the Discussions:

Discussion_1:

Neelima Darla

 Using intuition in decision making provides the opportunity of creating and innovative thinking and open to new ideas. Using intuition helps in identifying the things which are going wrong with the other employees and develop relationships with co-workers. Using intuition allows in identifying the risks. Intuitive decision making depends on emotions and feelings instead of facts. Using intuition in decision making has both positive and negative impacts. Using intuition in decision making can help in both personal and professional life (Wang & et al., 2019).

The disadvantages of using intuition in decision making are sometimes our emotions suppress experiences and result in poor decisions. Intuition is not a step by step thinking so most of the people cannot explain the thinking behind their intuition decision and face a problem while working as a team. So most of the decisions which are belonging to intuition decisions will not be working out at the level of an organization. If there is a main focus on the intuition then there will be some of the new ideas and these will be exhibited more effectively. In complex situations, this intuition can help in making decisions quickly (Wodak, 2019).

With the changing environments, intuition is playing a major role in decision-making and this intuition is very powerful at the organizations. The process of making decisions will be considered as one of the components which are nothing but puzzle pieces and there will be some puzzles which have been missed. The decisions which are easy will be made and this type of intuition will be having more importance for the purpose of maintaining relationships which are personal (Yilmaz & et al., 2018).

Discussion_2

Hima Chauhan

In any decision-making process, the role of intuitions is important. Decision making is the biggest challenge faced by many organizations and their leaders (Marcus, 2015). Leaders need to make decisions wisely and fast considering all internal and external factors. Mainly, there are two major problems, leaders faced while making decisions, first, level of complexity and fast-changing industry. Intuition in decision making defines has a sixth sense of making decisions, which include the experience of analytics, facts, feelings, and processes to make decisions (Scott, 2015). By analyzing and calculating the source of data. The future of any organization should be predicted but it is not a hundred percentage matches with the predictions. Therefore, intuition decision-making process help the leader to consider all the aspect of the business and study the market fluctuation to measure the future.

            If leaders do not have enough data or data is unappropriated, the leaders can not able to make a correct and effective decision. It prevents that the data is not enough for making an appropriate decision, therefore, leaders can use different initiation and other deliberative decision-making styles. If a leader chooses to get an intuition decision-making style, decision failure will create fewer problems. It provides quick solutions for problems. If the decision includes the emotions, intuition is helpful because it will never generate the expected decisions. The decision will be more accurate and without any personal motive, it will serve the organizational goals and missions with higher profitability ration and higher satisfactory ration on both the side. However, intuition decision making has drawbacks too. If the manager does not consider alternatives and other prospective, the decision may lead to the failure of the organizations. Mainly, this process will also depend on ethical, accurate, and relevant information, without this accurate data, the decision-making process will not be trustworthy.

            In conclusion, intuition decision-making model means the decision-making process in which intuition manager take decision with experience, knowledge, and without influence. It will allow organizations to know the outcomes of their decision whether it is for the future or present.