Week 2 -Discussion, Self-Care Plan, Summary and Refection

profileyazmillie13
JamesChapter3Theinterventionandassessmentmodels.pdf

Chapter Thee: The Intervention and Assessment Models

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Triage Assessment System

 Evaluates the severity of a crisis situation. Rapid Systematic Intentional

 Supports the client in gaining: Equilibrium Mobility Autonomy

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Hybrid Model of Crisis Intervention

 No longer a linear or stage model.

 Hybrid Model = linear + systems models. Can be linear or circular Tasks are the foundation  Predispositioning/Engaging  Problem Exploration  Providing Support  Examining Alternatives  Planning in Order to Reestablish Control  Obtaining Commitment  Follow-up

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 1: Predispositioning/Engaging

 Clients may not want to talk or may be so out of control that they are not even aware of the crisis worker’s presence.

 Engage in such a way that clients will be receptive to intervention.

Establish a therapeutic bond Inform the client about what to expect

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 1 Cont.

 How to Engage: Approach slowly, calmly, and with open body

language. Introduce yourself and ask their name. Use their name and maintain eye contact. Use basic listening skills and open-ended

questions. Clarify intentions. Allow client to cathart without escalation.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 2: Problem Exploration

Define the problem from the client’s point of view. May be difficult during the middle of a chaotic

situation Do not need a complete history Do need to identify the precipitating event

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 3: Providing Support

 Communicate concern for the client.

 Three types of support: Psychological support  Unconditional positive regard

Logistical Support  Physical support (food, water, shelter, etc.)  Education  Resources

 Social Support  Examine the client’s primary support system

• May not have the resources • May not be easily accessible • May not be willing • Client may be too embarrassed to seek help

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 4: Examining Alternatives

 Clients often think they have no options or develop tunnel-vision.

 Three key components: Situational supports Coping mechanisms Positive thinking patterns

 Brainstorm numerous alternatives. Continuous process due to rapidly changing conditions

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 5: Planning in Order to Reestablish Control

 Creating a plan includes:  Identifying resources for immediate support Develop coping mechanisms

 A good plan needs to be: Developed by the client Clear Realistic Behaviorally specific  Immediate (minutes, hours, or days)

 A plan allows the client to establish autonomy and become mobile.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 6: Obtaining Commitment

 If Task 5: Planning was done effectively, obtaining commitment may be easy.

 May be simply having the client verbally summarize the plan.

 If lethality is involved, a commitment may need to be written and signed by both parties.

 If there is any hesitation, the crisis worker may need to revisit earlier tasks.

 No commitment should be imposed by the crisis worker!

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Task 7: Follow-up

 Time frame of minutes, hours, or days.

 Inquire about the client’s ability to maintain mobility and equilibrium.

 Reinforces the crisis worker’s support of the client.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Assessing

 Continuous throughout crisis intervention.

 Allows the crisis worker to evaluate: Severity of the situation Client’s emotional, behavioral, and cognitive status Client’s level of mobility Safety (client’s, self, and others) Success of the crisis worker in deescalating the

situation

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Factors That Impact One’s Emotional Stability

 The duration of the crisis event.

 The degree of emotional stamina.

 The ecosystem in which the client resides.

 The developmental stage of the client.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Psychobiology Related to Crisis Intervention

 Traumatic events may impact the: Release of neurotransmitters Central and peripheral sympathetic nervous systems Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis

 Abnormal changes in neurotransmitters are involved in mental health disorders.

 Both legal and illegal drugs have a major affect on mental health.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Triage Assessment Form (TAF)

 Effective method of obtaining a real-time assessment of the client’s affective, behavioral, and cognitive statuses.

 Can be performed quickly by a wide spectrum of trained crisis workers.

Police officers  School counselors Volunteer crisis line workers Resident hall staff

 Informs the crisis worker of the current state of the client and of their own ability to deescalate the situation.

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Do You Know Your ABC’S?

 Three main domains of triage assessment Affective  Feeling or emotional tone

Behavioral  Action or psychomotor activity

Cognitive  Thinking patterns

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Affective State

 Often the first sign of disequilibrium.

 Can manifest as overly emotional or withdrawn.

 Incongruences among what the client says, how it is said, and non-verbal behaviors.

 Key question to ask: Do people typically show this kind of affect in

situations such as this?

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Behavioral Functioning

 Focus on psychomotor activities.  Approaches  Avoids  Paralyzed

 Often difficult for immobilized people to take independent actions.

 Attempt to have the client engage in a small concrete and immediate activity.

 Key questions to ask:  In the past, what actions did you take that helped you get back

in control?  What would you have to do now to get on top of the situation?

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Cognitive State

 Client’s thinking patterns:  Rationalizing?  Exaggerating?  Downward spiral?

 Crisis events are typically perceived as either a:  Transgression (present)  Threat (future)  Loss (past)

 Key questions to ask:  How long has the client been engaged in crisis thinking?  How open is the client to reframing?  How often does the client engage in crisis thinking?

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Rating Clients using the TAF

 Score from high to low to rule out more severe impairments.

 Each domain has a range from 1-10 (1=lowest score and 10=highest score).

 Total rating ranges from 3-30. Total score of 3-10 is a rating of minimal impairment Total score of 11-19 is a rating of moderate

impairment Total score of 20+ is a rating of severe impairment

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

TAF Rating

 Using the sample case of Leron from the textbook, how would you score Leron using the TAF . . .

When Leron first exits Union Avenue? When the CIT officer initially meets Leron? When Leron agrees to leave the scene and gets into

the police car? When the CIT officer is following-up with Leron at the

legal aid office?

©2013, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

  • Chapter Thee: The Intervention and Assessment Models
  • Triage Assessment System
  • Hybrid Model of Crisis Intervention
  • Task 1: Predispositioning/Engaging
  • Task 1 Cont.
  • Task 2: Problem Exploration
  • Task 3: Providing Support
  • Task 4: Examining Alternatives
  • Task 5: Planning in Order to Reestablish Control
  • Task 6: Obtaining Commitment
  • Task 7: Follow-up
  • Assessing
  • Factors That Impact One’s Emotional Stability
  • Psychobiology Related to Crisis Intervention
  • Triage Assessment Form (TAF)
  • Do You Know Your ABC’S?
  • Affective State
  • Behavioral Functioning
  • Cognitive State
  • Rating Clients using the TAF
  • TAF Rating