Journal article analysis
Chapter 8 Teamwork and Team Performance
Teams are worth the hard work
1
Chapter 8 Study Questions
What are high-performance teams?
How can team processes be improved?
How can team communications be improved?
How can team decisions be improved?
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2
How can we create high performance teams?
Characteristics of High Performance Teams
Set a clear and challenging direction.
Believe in the goals and motivated to work hard to accomplish them.
Turn a general sense of purpose into specific objectives.
Set standards for measuring results and obtain feedback.
Members have the right mix of technical, problem-solving and interpersonal skills.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The current focus on reality teams appeals to today’s work force. However, no matter the type, all teams must possess the essential core requirements of commitment to core values, goal attainment, and cooperative contributions toward high performance.
Members of newly formed teams must learn how to work together while passing through the stages of team formation. Team building is an effective way to arrive at this goal.
3
Figure 8.1: Steps in the team-building process
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Figure 8.1 - When team members notice an obstacle to their team effectiveness (lack of skill, technology, resources, or the like), a plan is designed to uncover the root cause and address it. Various data gathering techniques are used including questionnaires, interviews, or group discussions.
Team members collectively address questions that focus on the problem. For example, “How well are we doing in meeting our goal? What is standing in our way?”
4
How can we create high performance teams?
Formal retreat approach
Team building occurs during an offsite “retreat.”
Outdoor experience approach
Members engage in a variety of physically challenging situations that require teamwork.
Continuous improvement approach
The manager, team leader, or group members take responsibility for ongoing team building.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5
Team-building retreats offer opportunities for intense and concentrated efforts to examine group accomplishments and operations. Often a consultant is hired to assist with the team building process.
By having to work together in the face of difficult obstacles, team members are supposed to experience
increased self-confidence, more respect for others’ capabilities, and a greater commitment to teamwork.
Continuous improvement of teamwork is essential to the themes of total quality and total service management so important to organizations today.
How can team processes be improved?
New members may worry about:
Participation
Goals
Control
Relationships
Processes
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6
Special difficulties are likely to occur when members first get together in a new group or work team, or when new members join an existing one. Problems arise as new members try to understand what is expected of them while dealing with the anxiety and discomfort of a new social setting.
Coping Mechanisms Used by New Team Members
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The defense mechanisms of insecure new members may hinder team performance. Teams must address the insecurities by discussions that include clarifying the team goals and expectations and clarifying each member’s role.
7
Tough Battler
Acts aggressive
Seeks authority
Friendly Helper
Acts insecure
Tries to be helpful
Objective Thinker
Acts reflective
Wants clear goals
Team Role Preferences
Score Interpretation
12 to 15 High preference
8 to 11 Moderate preference
3 to 7 Low preference
Encourager - People who score high on this dimension have a strong tendency to praise and support the ideas of other team members, thereby showing warmth and solidarity to the group.
Gatekeeper - People who score high on this dimension have a strong tendency to encourage all team members to participate in the discussion
8
Sustained high performance requires meeting both task needs and maintenance needs of team members.
Maintenance activities can include team members or leaders encouraging the participation of others, trying to harmonize differences of opinion, praising the contributions of others and agreeing to go along with the popular course of action.
Team Role Preferences
Harmonizer - People who score high on this dimension have a strong tendency to mediate intragroup conflicts and reduce tension.
Initiator - People who score high on this dimension have a strong tendency to identify goals for the meeting, including ways to work on those goals.
Summarizer - People who score high on this dimension have a strong tendency to keep track of what was said in the meeting (i.e., act as the team’s memory).
9
Sustained high performance requires meeting both task needs and maintenance needs of team members.
Maintenance activities can include team members or leaders encouraging the participation of others, trying to harmonize differences of opinion, praising the contributions of others and agreeing to go along with the popular course of action.
Distributed Leadership
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Distributed leadership is the sharing of responsibility for meeting group task and maintenance needs. Task activities directly contribute to the performance of important group tasks. While maintenance activities deal with social and interpersonal relationships among team members.
10
Task Contributions
Offering ideas
Summarizing discussion
Maintenance Contributions
Encouraging others
Inviting participation
Clarifying suggestions
Giving information
Seeking information
Reconciling differences
Expressing standards
Offering agreement
How can team processes be improved?
Role
Set of expectations associated with a job or position on a team.
Role ambiguity
Occurs when a person is uncertain about his or her role and what is expected.
Role overload
Occurs when too much is expected of the individual.
Role underload
Occurs when too little is expected of the individual.
11
When team members are unclear about their roles or experience conflicting role demands, performance problems can occur. Although this is a common problem, it can be managed through awareness of role dynamics and their causes.
How can team processes be improved?
Role conflict
Occurs when a person is unable to respond to role expectations that conflict with one another.
Forms of role conflict
Intrasender, Intersender, Person-role, Inter-role.
Role negotiation
Process for discussing and agreeing upon what team members expect of one another.
Team members meet to discuss, clarify, and agree on their individual role expectations each holds for the other.
12
The individual understands what needs to be done but for some reason cannot comply.
The resulting tension can reduce satisfaction and affect both an individual’s performance
and relationships with other group members.
How can team processes be improved?
Norms
Represent ideas or beliefs about how members are expected to behave.
Considered rules or standards of conduct that are supposed to guide members.
Help members to guide their own behavior and predict what others will do.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13
Managers and leaders should help their groups adopt positive norms that support organizational goals.
Norms help clarify the expectations associated with a person’s membership in a group.
How can team processes be improved?
Key norms that can have positive or negative implications.
Performance norms.
Ethics norms.
Organizational and personal pride norms.
High-achievement norms.
Support and helpfulness norms.
Improvement and change norms.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14
Groups also commonly have norms regarding how to deal with supervisors, colleagues, and customers, as well as norms establishing guidelines for honesty and ethical behaviors.
Norms are often evident in the everyday conversations and actions of people at work.
Owner (O) -
How can team processes be improved?
Cohesiveness
The degree to which members are attracted to a group and motivated to remain a part of it.
There is a strong relationship between cohesiveness, conformity to group norms, and performance.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15
Persons in a highly cohesive group value their membership and strive to maintain positive relationships with other group members. In this sense, cohesive groups and teams are good for their members.
How can team processes be improved?
Ways to achieve positive inter-team dynamics
Refocusing members on a common enemy or goal.
Negotiating directly.
Engaging members, of different teams, in activities learning how to work cooperatively together.
Refocusing reward systems to emphasize contributions to overall organizational performance and on how much teams help one another.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
It is important to avoid win-lose reward systems in which one group must lose something in order for the other to gain. Cooperation tends to increase as interaction between groups increases.
16
Figure 8.5 Interaction patterns and communication networks found in teams
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
17
How can team communications be improved?
Virtual communication networks
Technology provide numerous resources for real time communication.
Empowers team members to be in constant electronic contact with one another or a central database.
Online team building activities are critically important to high quality results.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Communication technologies provide team members various opportunities to contribute to team performance and achieve results.
18
How can team decisions be improved?
Decision by majority rule
Formal voting usually takes place, or members may be polled, publicly or confidentially, to find the majority viewpoint.
Decision by consensus
Discussion leads to one alternative being favored by most members and the other members agree to support it.
Decision by unanimity
All group members agree totally on the course of action to be taken.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
1-19
Teams use various decision-making processes in choosing alternative courses of action.
19
How can team decisions be improved?
Groupthink
The tendency of members in highly cohesive groups to lose their critical evaluative capabilities.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20
Desires to hold the group together and to avoid unpleasant disagreements lead to an overemphasis on agreement and under emphasis on critical discussion. The result can often be a poor decision.
How can team decisions be improved?
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21
Groupthink is a serious threat to the quality of decision making in groups. Leaders and members alike should be alert to the
symptoms of groupthink and be quick to take any necessary action to prevent its occurrence.
Avoiding groupthink
Leader refrains from announcing any position.
Every team member acts as critical evaluator.
Different sub-groups explore same problems.
Bring in outside experts to evaluate information, realism of goals, and plans for action.
Assign someone to be a “devil’s” advocate at each team meeting. Rotate an appointed team "devil's advocate" so that no one particular person appears to dissent.
How can team decisions be improved?
Brainstorming
Used in teams to actively generate as many ideas and alternatives as possible.
All criticism is ruled out
All ideas are welcomed
Emphasis on creativity and imagination
Quantity is wanted
Building on others’ ideas or “piggy-backing” is encouraged
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22
IBM’s program, called Innovation Jam uses the brainstorming technique. Everyone is encouraged to suggest how others’ ideas can be turned into new ideas or how two or more ideas can be joined into still another new idea.
How can team decisions be improved?
Nominal group technique
Members are asked to respond individually and in writing to a “nominal” question.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23
Everyone is encouraged to list as many alternatives or ideas as they can. Next, participants are asked to read aloud their responses to the nominal question in round-robin fashion. The recorder writes each response on large newsprint as it is offered. No criticism is allowed. The recorder asks for any questions that may clarify items on the newsprint.