Deliverable 3 - Evaluate Research and Data

1

Deliverable 3 - Evaluate Research and Data

Jamie Raines

Attempt 1

Rasmussen College

HSA5000CBE Section 01CBE Scholarly Research and Writing

Caroline Gulbrandsen

8/26/2022

Running head: RESEARCH QUESTION EVALUATION 2

Research Question Evaluation

The credibility of the Data

The research question integrated into this study is related to how artificial intelligence (AI) integration in

clinical radiology has the potential to disrupt the industry. According to Becker et al. (2022), AI is strongly

connected to the operations performed in clinical radiology for better test results. The technology allows machines

can achieve human-level performance while performing detection of any tumors during radiology tests. There are

suitable improvements performed in the AI industry using research that structures technical operations by

machines to validate the Integration of AI algorithms for patient care. The credibility of the data in the article is

reliable since the authors researched how healthcare professionals who have used artificial intelligence have

promoted better health management. Most research participants agreed that AI integration in radiology

information technology (IT) departments has promoted accuracy and reduced excess time for setting up systems.

The next article focused on the use of AI for medical imaging, whereby it is clear that the demand for AI is

constantly progressing. According to Mulryan et al. (2022), the advancements in AI have been adverse, causing

some radiologists to develop a negative attitude towards the industry that could potentially eliminate human jobs.

AI has been found to simulate human brain capacity, which does not get received well by professionals in

healthcare settings. This indicates more operations can get performed to validate AI operations since they are

needed for system management. The article's data was collected from journalists, radiologists, commercial

representatives, researchers, and non-radiologist doctors, and all provided different opinions on the impact of AI

in medical imaging.

Documentation of the Data

All the articles integrate a high-quality data documentation process since there are different topics, use of

graphics, and graphs that explain how the research got conducted. There was a direct process to determine that the

articles were quantitative since there was a comparison among different variables. In the article by Becker et al.

(2022), the data analyzed how different respondents reacted to the value of AI in clinical radiology. The Data then

Running head: RESEARCH QUESTION EVALUATION 3

got recorded in tables under different questions so that there would be an accurate analysis outcome by finding out

the number of responses that supported or did not support concepts mentioned in a research question. In the same

article, an example of accurate documentation is a graph that indicated data from clinical radiologists on why they

did not acquire certified AI-algorism expertise.

In the second article, Mulryan et al. (2022) offered accurate data representations using schematics that

integrated different reactions and the number of participants by applying a logistic regression model to determine

the Data's validity. The use of key terms was possible upon opening the document as it was possible to detect that

the application of the quantitative research method was common by indicating a different number of participants

used in the research and how their answers got distributed. The study was direct and only required participants to

answer questions during survey sessions while providing their data for easy identification. Collecting data from

different radiologists was applied to promote the study's validity.

Evaluation of Data Analysis and Interpretation

The data collected from the articles support a hypothesis developed for the study: it is imperative to

conform to AI practices in radiology since they affect inevitable healthcare delivery. The future of AI appears to

be getting more advanced, especially for the radiology industry, which integrates a structure for change in

handling system operations. It can be possible to handle superintelligence operations based on AI's ability to

mimic human clinical radiologists' behavior. The authors introduced the level of expertise in handling AI

operations advancements based on the capability to correlate ideas for generating better data analysis. The

existence of AI for clinical radiology is a structure connected to the change of different aspects in the healthcare

environment due to its capability to manage system operations. There is thus a structure for change in terms of

better machine operations for patient healthcare improvement. Management of human beings' acceptance of AI is

required for the best procedure of offering intelligence improvement for a safe healthcare future.

Possible Ethical Issues

Running head: RESEARCH QUESTION EVALUATION 4

In conclusion, it would be possible to correlate real-life positive healthcare outcomes and the data provided

by persons familiar with the area of interest. There are conditions required to improve AI operations, including

algorithm management and logic handling, which are all imperative to support healthcare expertise by clinical

radiologists as they learn to perform AI operations. All these are appropriate techniques for promoting accurate

system handling as an accurate structure for AI integration into clinical radiology and medical imaging.

Digitization of healthcare imaging operations affects existent automation operations that seek to engage people

with the technical environment expertise in operations structured to integrate better machine learning processes as

set up using clinical radiology expertise. The authors thus were affected by the influx of too much technology in

healthcare that may seem to undermine the expertise of healthcare providers. It is thus critical to operate in the

current advanced IT environment using the training of clinical radiologists instead of solely trusting AI. Applying

social constructs and views from clinical radiologists is thus imperative to constantly manage AI operations

related to accurate system improvements.

Running head: RESEARCH QUESTION EVALUATION 5

References

Becker, C., Kotter, E., Fournier, L., & Martí-Bonmatí, L. (2022). Current practical experience with artificial

intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Into Imaging,

13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01247-y.

Mulryan, P., Ni Chleirigh, N., O’Mahony, A., Crowley, C., Ryan, D., & McLaughlin, P. et al. (2022). An

evaluation of information online on artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Insights Into Imaging, 13(1).

doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01209-4