Need 500 words on this question

Manikiran

ITS630_Residency012920212.pptx

Home >Information Systems homework help >Need 500 words on this question

ITS 630: Virtual Residency Session

FAll RESIDENCY, January 29 -31, 2021(virtual)

Dr. John R. Wetsch

University of the Cumberlands

School of Computer and information sciences

Agenda

Welcome

Overview of Residency Session

Format

Assignments

Attendance

Presentations

APA

Rubric

Facilities

Assignments

Lecture

Residency Session Format (Virtual)

Session 1: January 29 (Friday): 5:00 PM – 10:00 PM Eastern

Attendance (Visual), Course Overview, Residency Overview, Lecture

8:00 PM Attendance Check-in

9:45 – 10:00 Complete Residency Assessment/Dismissal

Session 2: January 30 (Saturday): 8:00 AM – 7:30 PM Eastern

8:00 AM Visual Attendance, Instructions for the Day

11:45 – 12:00 Attendance Check, Break for Lunch (1.5 hr. break)

1:30 PM – Visual Attendance, Progress Status

6:00 PM – Attendance Check-In

7:00 PM– 7:30 Finalize Group Presentation Work, Submit Presentation Draft

Session 3: January 31(Sunday): 8:00 AM – 1:30 PM Eastern

8:00 AM Visual Attendance, Presentations given, Submit Assignments, Conclude Session

1:00 Attendance Check-Out

Presentation Guidelines

Presentations are to be 15-20 mins in length + time for Q&A

Papers should be 10 pages in length (min).

Paper Count does not include title page or reference list.

APA Format is Required

Allow time for Questions after the presentation

About 5 mins.

Each Group will determine who is presenting.

Practical Connection Paper must be submitted by the end of the class on January 29.

Presentation must be submitted by the end of the class on January 30.

Paper must be uploaded by the end of class on January 31.

Residency Session Attendance

General Information

Attendance at all Sessions is Mandatory

Absent if:

Not Present

Do not complete visual check-in with Govt. Issued ID.

Do not complete online check-ins

Sessions will go for the Duration

Do not leave early

Project Presentation

Some Do’s and Don’ts

Do be prepared to present and be professional in presentations

Don’t use Wikipedia as a research source

Do use sound academic and researched literature

Don’t be soft spoken, speak up!

Do your best!

Ask Questions (Everyone Should Be involved!)

It is Not Just the Group!

Questions:

Expecting each group to answer a minimum of 2 student questions and questions from the professor.

Expect class to participate.

Question Assessment:

Failure to ask questions will be an individual deduction of 5% off the presentation grade.

Your Group Assignment

YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

In the residency weekend the class will break up into assigned groups and work on a use case as noted below:

Your team is the consulting team that has been hired by company X. Company X has hired your team to create a new innovative product that will increase their profits. In this project you must:

Select a real company that would hire out a consulting firm to assist with the creation of a product to assist with their profits.

The product must be innovative and create profits in the organization.

The team must:

Denote the current leadership model in the team

The pros and cons of the current leadership model, assess whether the current leadership model can sustain the new product, and note why or why not. If the organizational leadership needs to change state how.

Note the top five organizational strategic goals that the product will enhance and why

Note the top five decisions that leadership will have to make with the implementation of the new product

Note any organizational changes that must occur for the product to be successful

Create the product and note why it will be successful and fit into the organization’s strategy

Create a PowerPoint presentation to show the leadership team and pitch the idea

Note: This project is more about the leadership modifications that need to occur due to the implementation of a new product.

Executive Program Practical Connection Assignment

Component	Proficient (15 to 20 points)	Competent (8 to 14 points)	Novice (1 to 7 points)	Score
Assignment Requirements	Student completed all required portions of the assignment	Completed portions of the assignment	Did not complete the required assignment.
Writing Skills, Grammar, and APA Formatting	Assignment strongly demonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. Assignment is well written, and ideas are well developed and explained. Demonstrates strong writing skills. Student paid close attention to spelling and punctuation. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct. Proper use of APA formatting. Properly and explicitly cited outside resources. Reference list matches citations.	Assignment demonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. Assignment is effectively communicated, but some sections lacking clarity. Student paid some attention to spelling and punctuation, but there are errors within the writing. Needs attention to proper writing skills. Use of APA formatting and citations of outside resources, but has a few instances in which proper citations are missing.	Assignment does not demonstrate graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. Assignment is poorly written and confusing. Ideas are not communicated effectively. Student paid no attention to spelling and punctuation. Demonstrates poor writing skills. The assignment lacks the use of APA formatting and does not provide proper citations or includes no citations.
Maintains purpose/focus	Submission is well organized and has a tight and cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the document	Submissions has an organizational structure and the focus is clear throughout.	Submission lacks focus or contains major drifts in focus
Understanding of Course Content	Student demonstrates understand of course content and knowledge.	Student demonstrates some understanding of course content and knowledge.	Student does not demonstrate understanding of course content and knowledge.
Work Environment Application	Student strongly demonstrates the practical application, or ability to apply, of course objectives within a work environment.	Student demonstrates some practical application, or ability to apply, of course objectives within a work environment.	Student does not demonstrate the practical application, or ability to apply, of course objectives within a work environment.

Practical Connection Paper Rubric (500 Words)

Residency Lecture: Organizations & Decision making

Dr. John R. Wetsch

Organizations and Decision Making

Organization Types

Decision Making

Decision Making Process

Project Evaluation Rubric

Component	Exemplary (3)	Adequate (2)	Inadequate (1)	Score
Project overview	Effectively and insightfully develops a set of testable, supportable and impactful study hypotheses.	Develops a set of testable and supportable hypotheses.	Hypotheses are not testable or justifiable.
Justification for hypotheses	The introduction section provides a cogent overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking.	The introduction section provides a logical overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates competent critical thinking.	Very little support for the conceptual and theoretical relevant to the study hypotheses was provided. Provides little evidence of sound critical thinking.
Supporting evidence	Provides clearly appropriate evidence to support position	Provides adequate evidence to support position	Provides little or no evidence to support position
Review of relevant research	Sophisticated integration, synthesis, and critique of literature from related fields. Places work within larger context.	Provides a meaningful summary of the literature. Shows understanding of relevant literature	Provides little or no relevant scholarship.
Maintains purpose/focus	The project is well organized and has a tight and cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the document	The project has an organizational structure and the focus is clear throughout.	The document lacks focus or contains major drifts in focus
Methodology · Sample · Procedures · Measures · Data analytic plan	Identifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques (e.g., justifies the sample, procedures, and measures). Data analytic plan is suitable to test study hypotheses. Provides appropriate justification for controls. Project is feasible	Identifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques but some details are missing or vague.	The methodologies described are either not suited or poorly suited to test hypotheses. The methodology is under-developed and/or is not feasible.
Grammar, clarity, and organization	The manuscript is well written and ideas are well developed and explained. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses subheadings appropriately.	The manuscript effectively communicates ideas. The writing is grammatically correct, but some sections lack clarity.	The manuscript is poorly written and confusing. Ideas are not communicated effectively.
References and citations	Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list matches citations	Properly cited. May have a few instances in which proper citations are missing.	The manuscript lacks proper citations or includes no citations.

Overall Total: ______________

Project Evaluation Rubric

Overall Total: ______________

Component Exemplary (3) Adequate (2) Inadequate (1) Score

Project overview Effectively and insightfully develops a set of

testable, supportable and impactful study

hypotheses.

Develops a set of testable and

supportable hypotheses.

Hypotheses are not testable or

justifiable.

Justification for

hypotheses

The introduction section provides a cogent

overview of conceptual and theoretical issues

related to the study hypotheses.

Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking.

The introduction section

provides a logical overview of

conceptual and theoretical

issues related to the study

hypotheses. Demonstrates

competent critical thinking.

Very little support for the conceptual

and theoretical relevant to the study

hypotheses was provided. Provides

little evidence of sound critical

thinking.

Supporting evidence Provides clearly appropriate evidence to

support position

Provides adequate evidence

to support position

Provides little or no evidence to

support position

Review of relevant

research

Sophisticated integration, synthesis, and

critique of literature from related fields.

Places work within larger context.

Provides a meaningful

summary of the literature.

Shows understanding of

relevant literature

Provides little or no relevant

scholarship.

Maintains

purpose/focus

The project is well organized and has a tight

and cohesive focus that is integrated

throughout the document

The project has an

organizational structure and

the focus is clear throughout.

The document lacks focus or

contains major drifts in focus

Methodology

 Sample

 Procedures

 Measures

 Data analytic

plan

Identifies appropriate methodologies and

research techniques (e.g., justifies the

sample, procedures, and measures). Data

analytic plan is suitable to test study

hypotheses. Provides appropriate

justification for controls. Project is feasible

Identifies appropriate

methodologies and research

techniques but some details

are missing or vague.

The methodologies described are

either not suited or poorly suited to

test hypotheses. The methodology is

under-developed and/or is not

feasible.

Grammar, clarity, and

organization

The manuscript is well written and ideas are

well developed and explained. Sentences and

paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses

subheadings appropriately.

The manuscript effectively

communicates ideas. The

writing is grammatically

correct, but some sections

lack clarity.

The manuscript is poorly written and

confusing. Ideas are not

communicated effectively.

References and

citations

Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list

matches citations

Properly cited. May have a

few instances in which proper

citations are missing.

The manuscript lacks proper

citations or includes no citations.