Information Technology Act, 2000

Running head: IT ACT 2000 1

IT ACT 2000 3

IT act 2000

Gary Blanton

American Military University

Title: Penalties and adjudication for various information and technology offences.

Thesis: Penalties and adjudication for various information and technology offences are not playing the crucial role of securing the abolition of breaching the law, which has been set, to safe guide the key players in the platform. The law is not even ensuring that those people who temple with the originality of a given person work.

i. Introduction

a. Thesis

b. The role of the thesis.

ii. Expounding on the law and some of the changes needs to make it better.

a. Background of the law

b. Some of the recommendation that has been pointed out concerning the law by different stakeholders.

c. The effects of the law on today's information and technology industry.

iii. The main objectives of the law.

a. The success and the future of IT in the country

b. The goals of addressing the topic

c. The significance of the law and the setbacks

d. The significance of implement the law to the grass root.

iv. The benefit of law to the industry

a. The key traits of for success

b. The goal of the law

c. Efforts to introduce new laws and ensuring they have been followed.

i. Significance of changing some articles in the law

ii. Incorporating of organs to ensure that the effectiveness of the law

d. Making sure that the law meets the national and international standards

v. Recommendation from the writer's view.

a. Some of the things that can make a difference in the information and technology sector.

vi. Conclusion

a. Summarizing the arguments and efforts made

Reference

Bottoms, A. (2001). Compliance and community penalties. Community penalties: Change and challenges, 87-116.

Roth, M. P. (2010). Crime and punishment: A history of the criminal justice system. Nelson Education.