Revision of research essay
Patel 1
Isha Patel
Professor Armes
ENGL 1320
20 February, 2020
Black Immigrants and Racial Discrimination
There are several cases that pop up each year regarding racial discrimination against the black
immigrants in the United States. There are cases that go unnoticed because most of the people
choose not to speak about it. In other cases, the society also would not accept that such activities
take place thus making it a challenge for them to keep up. There are numerous immigrants
getting into the United States voluntarily including Europeans and other whites but the racial
slurs are only directed towards the blacks migrating into the country. There are numerous
concerns in the country that raise the attention towards racial discrimination especially from the
people visiting the country. The discrimination ranges from when they are seeking to access the
public services in the country, from the justice department especially the police department.
Most of the immigrants move to the United States at a shot for a better life, education, medical
opportunities, job opportunities and escape from war among other vices in their parent countries.
However, the people are embraced to get into the country they still fail to live a happy and
comfortable life because the society does not entirely embrace them. Racism in the United States
does not necessarily focus on the Black immigrants but against the entire races that make it a
challenge for any individual with a different skin color in the country and this limits their access
to resources. This thesis is a bit confusing. Earlier in the introduction you say that “slurs are only
Patel 2
directed towards the blacks migrating into this country,” but then in your thesis, you say “Racism
in the United States does not necessarily focus on the Black immigrants”. This first paragraph is
also a bit confusing since you mention only “Black immigrants.” Are you suggesting African-
American citizens do not experience the same racism as Black immigrants? I think you’ll want to
clarify the introduction and thesis.
The law enforcement across the country are mostly accused as being the most racist in
the country and them being with weapons impacts the immigrants and creates a negative picture
on the community. The police are the security front of the community thus it is important that
they make sure that they keep up with the demand of the country (Foner, 64). The law
enforcement officers in the country mainly judge and discriminate from racial discrimination but
not a specific group (Hmmm, you might want to research this a bit. I’m pretty sure the
Department of Justice has done studies on racial profiling and racial bias toward African-
Americans, at least in Ferguson, Missouri and in New York with the Stop-and-Frisk policy. But
there should also be a lot of other information dealing with this claim. It is evident that the police
do not have a specific time or information on people to approach them but the color of their skin
made the difference. The specificity of racism makes the difference because there is no specific
measure that shows the police selectively choose the black immigrants (See above comment).
There is no specific information that the police selectively choose a specific immigrant and opt
to treat them different instead they discriminate the entire race. There is little difference between
the original black American inhabitants and the immigrants entering the United States in the
current era. The world is not making progress on the social front that is not appropriate because
we are all human and this limits the interactions and relationships that we are creating as people.
Patel 3
The law enforcement being the forefront and the leaders of the community and are
allowed to carry weapons makes them a very important in impacting security and confidence in
the people. The confidence that the officers instill in the community makes it easier to increase
the connection between the people and the races. The other native races (Whom specifically?)
depend on the interactions and the image the officers portray that then will help influence their
attitude towards the other immigrants because they are in the authoritative position (Bell,
Marquardt & Berry, 298). For instance, if the officers would treat the immigrants the same way
that they treat the whites then there would be no need for the community to fear them and treat
them differently. However, because the officers will approach the blacks with a negative
premonition even on the speed checks on the roads and demand them to evacuate their vehicles
while they do not do the same with the whites then they paint the blacks as dangerous or a threat
thus they have to fear them (This statement contradicts what was said in the preceding paragraph
– the one on which I commented). In the other incidences where the African Americans would
walk with hoodies in the society and police officers tackle them and even place them in their
vehicles and they do not do the same for the whites students in hoods (Word choice. Avoid slang
in academic papers). The security that the law enforcement officers provide in the community
makes a difference and impacts the perception of the people and because they have poor
relationships then it also makes it a challenge for the people to keep up.
The society is not opening up towards the African Americans including the immigrants
which are a problem that is emanating from the political climate and the leadership in the
country. The people are on the fore front of the country and it’s their place to make sure that the
society is living in peace and unity. It is evident that President Trump is against immigrants and
this pushes the community to stand against the immigrants because the leader instills the concept
Patel 4
that the immigrants are entering the country to steal their opportunities and resources. True. It
would be helpful to illustrate this by bringing in a quote from Trump which shows this. Most of
the supporters in the country that stood up with the president and some of his agendas was to
make sure that the Americans reclaim their country. The message comes out wrong in the eyes of
some of the ethnic white communities because and thus builds up racism and differentiation in
the society. It is unethical for a leader to have such attitudes and behavior especially in a country
where all the people are immigrants. The Trump supporters especially the White Supremacists
started the belief that they cannot live with the same immigrants in the country and this is after
such campaigns and words started emanating in the open.
People have differences and feel different from the others but most of them learn to live
with it but when it gets public then it becomes a problem because some people will start hurting
others. The cases that involve the attacks on the black immigrants in the country are horrific and
bad and can trigger some xenophobic attacks and this will not be appropriate especially because
the country has numerous immigrants from across the world (Saleem, et al. 1339). Still a bit
confused. The paper’s title and thesis want to focus on “Black immigrants,” but the discussion is
much broader, including all immigrants and African-American citizens. You’ll want to adjust
your title and thesis. The United States is successful and wealthy to the current day especially
because it relies on the immigrants that visited the country back in the day as refugees. The move
made it easier for them to gain some of the giant companies (Such as?) including the current
president Trump whose roots date back to Europe. The concept makes the difference because
there is no discrimination against such people but they choose when to be discriminatory. The
concept is unethical and impractical which is not appropriate for the community because people
have to interact and depend on each other thus failure of creating and building such relationships
Patel 5
changes the entire structure of the society. The black immigrants are in the country not to create
social indifferences but to try and find opportunities to improve their lives that is something that
the United States can offer.
The Americans moved from all over the world and dismissed the Native Americans from
their lands which were not appropriate and thus they have the audacity to dispel other people
from the same lands. The history of the country makes it important for them to appreciate
immigrants and because it is also important for them to access the reason that brought the people
into the country including the human rights. The United Nations through charity organization
recommends that a country should take in a certain capacity of immigrants into the country. The
Black immigrants get into the country for better opportunities and they do not interfere with the
social status in the country (Foner, 67). For instance, the blacks that died in New York, West
Indian are innocent victims of misdirected hatred. The people were no threat to the society and
this makes it a challenge because it meant that they were not a problem and instead they were a
form of opportunity in the country. It is unethical for the society to live in such animalistic habits
that hinder the people to show their humane side and instead keeps bringing the bad out of the
people.
The society is larger than an individual thus it is important to make sure that a single
person or the feelings of the few do not tarnish the reputation of the entire community. The
racists are few in the community and do not speak up for the feelings of the larger society which
is not appropriate. Most of the Americans relate well with the immigrants which is good but then
it is limited to a specific society because it should change the way that the society relates with
them thus making it easier for them (Krieger, 1706). For instance, the few people in the United
States selective states make it a challenge for the black immigrants in the new country because it
Patel 6
is not appropriate for a selective group to make decisions regarding the others. The country has
numerous people from across the world that makes it important to make sure that they work
together and come up with proper concepts for their community. The interaction within the
society is not on the basis of the racial differences but the community in the general that then
changes the way that people look at each other. The relationship in the society should be open
and interactive that makes it easier for them to interact and come together which will help reduce
the rates of discrimination in the society.
The United States has immigrants from across the world including the Asians, Arabs
among others that makes it a country of opportunities. The fact that black immigrants are most
victims in the country makes the difference because they are a target which is not appropriate
especially because they have to keep up with the community. The differences indicate that the
darkest skin color in the community make the difference and thus the most target that then makes
it bad. Most of the students (Why students?) in the country that are native whites make the most
population and thus cannot stand the black immigrants in the countries (Earlier you said, “Most
Americans relate well with the immigrants …”). The society is filled with the negativity against
the immigrants into the country starting with the American political and government hierarchy
that then makes it a challenge for the insignificant to maneuver through the hatred and
judgmental society (Park, 83). The concept makes the difference in the community because
people already have negative perceptions that do not include the black immigrants taking away
their opportunities. The black immigrants are a threat in the country according to the natives of
the country and thus the bad blood also builds among the youths that then see the others as a
threat. The students stay in hatred and negativity with the bad knowledge that the job
opportunities will belong to the immigrant’s students in their class that then makes it a challenge.
Patel 7
Conclusion
The assimilation and immigrants in the country appear as a threat in the country because
they appear to take the peoples jobs since they always have the status of education and
employment. The people in the United States take the immigration as potential thereat which is
not appropriate and misdirected because the people are innocent. The government in place and
some of the leaders has a major contribution towards the racial discrimination in the country
because they encourage the people to feel like the outsiders in the country are a threat. The
government through the various leaders should discourage their citizens from remaining racial
discriminative and since they already welcomed them into their country it is not necessary to
subject people into further trials. We are all humans and despite having a black, white or brown
skin complexion we are all people and at the top of the animal kingdom and thus it is important
to make sure that we bring out the best out of each other instead of behaving like the same
animals that do not have the people skills which is unethical.
Patel 8
Works Cited
Bell, Myrtle P., Dennis Marquardt, and Daphne P. Berry. ""Diversity," Immigration, and the
New American Multi-Racial Hierarchy." Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 29, no.
3, 2014, pp. 285-303.
Krieger, Nancy, PhD., et al. "Racial Discrimination, Psychological Distress, and Self-Rated
Health among US-Born and Foreign-Born Black Americans." American Journal of
Public Health, vol. 101, no. 9, 2011, pp. 1704-13.
Nancy Foner. “Black Immigrants and the Realities of Racism: Comments and
Questions.” Journal of American Ethnic History, vol. 36, no. 1, 2016, pp. 63–70.
Park, Young. The Dark Side: Immigrants, Racism, and the American Way. Bloomington, Ind:
iUniverse Com, 2012. Print.
Saleem, Farzana T., et al. "The Impact of African American Parents' Racial Discrimination
Experiences and Perceived Neighborhood Cohesion on their Racial Socialization
Practices." Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 45, no. 7, 2016, pp. 1338-1349.
Patel 9
Hi Isha,
For revision:
1. Address comments throughout the paper.
2. This paper needs a clear focus. As it stands, it tries to tackle law enforcement and
discrimination, immigration and xenophobia, hate crimes, Native American displacement, and
job competition. The two paragraphs on law enforcement seem to contradict each other. This part
of the paper ultimately feels like it’s undermining the paper’s premise on discrimination. There
are several contradictions throughout which would benefit from more analysis and clarification.
For revision, I would choose one topic related to discrimination and explore that. You could, for
example, write an entire paper on law enforcement and discrimination, or immigration and
xenophobia, but, in a paper of this length, it is not really possible to address all of these topics.
3. Clarify which information is from your sources. The citations seem as if they have been
randomly dropped into places. I cannot really tell what each source is actually adding to the
discussion. The easiest way to fix this is to include a quotation from each source. Take a look at
the handout on Canvas which deals with citing sources.
Thanks.
120