Compare and contrast
IQ and Adaptive Behavior Assessments
Compare and contrast the features and uses of IQ tests (WISC-IV, SB5) and Adaptive Behavior Scales such as the Vineland.
a) In which areas do the tests overlap? How are they different?
Consider the following…
· The purposes and uses of each type instrument with students who have special needs
· The skills and abilities assessed by each
· How the tests are administered and scored
· How are scores and results used
· How would teachers use information from these assessments
b) Discuss the interactive roles of IQ tests and adaptive behavior scales in developing the IEP
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and submitted into the d2l dropbox.
RUBRIC
|
CATEGORY |
DOES NOT MEET (1) |
MEETS (3) |
EXCELS (5) |
|
Comparison of Assessments |
Less than two paragraphs or minimal content. States but does not describe similarities/differences between the assessments. |
Two paragraphs that provide a general overview of the assessments, including similarities and differences. |
Two paragraphs that provide a definition, overview, and description of the assessments, describing specific similarities and differences. |
|
Purposes |
Provides a vague purpose or reason for using each assessment. |
Provides a general description of the purpose of each assessment, how it is used, and for whom. |
Thoroughly describes the purpose of each assessment, what information is provided, the various populations that are assessed. |
|
Areas Assessed |
Provides a general or incomplete list of the areas assessed for each assessment. |
States the domains and areas to be assessed in both types of assessments. Includes categories and sections where skills are measured. |
Describes specific domains, sections and subsections as they are specifically listed. Provides examples of actual skills and abilities that are measured. |
|
Administration of Assessments |
Provides a general or inaccurate description of who may implement each type of assessment tool. |
States who administers each assessment, including any required qualifications. |
States who typically administers each assessment, including any specific qualifications needed. Mentions the methods for evaluating students. |
|
Scores and results |
Lists the types of scores that are determined. Does not provide how they are used or what specific student characteristics have been measured. |
Describes the types of scores and results found in each assessment. Indicates what the results tell us about a student’s skills, areas of strength, or needs. |
Describes what types of ratings or scores are used and what they indicate about the diagnosis, skills level, areas of strength or needs of a student, and if it is considered a formal or informal score. |
|
Use of Results |
Inaccurate or vague or description of how the results may be used by teachers. Provides no specific examples |
Describes how results can be used for instruction. |
Provides examples of how teachers can use the results in planning, instruction, or assessment. |
|
Role in IEP Process |
Provides inaccurate or limited role each assessment plays in the development of the IEP. |
Provides a summary paragraph that discusses the uses of IQ and Adaptive Behavior Assessments in the creation of the IEP. |
Thoroughly describes how IQ and Adaptive Behavior Assessments are used both individually and interactively in various sections of the IEP. |
A 31-35 pts; B 27-30; C 23-26; D 20-22; F < 20