Week 8

profilemloi01
IPPTChap018.ppt

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter Eighteen

Equity Valuation Models

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Valuation: Fundamental Analysis

  • Fundamental analysis models a company’s value by assessing its current and future profitability.
  • The purpose of fundamental analysis is to identify mispriced stocks relative to some measure of “true” value derived from financial data.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Models of Equity Valuation

  • Balance Sheet Models
  • Dividend Discount Models (DDM)
  • Price/Earnings Ratios
  • Free Cash Flow Models

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Valuation by Comparables

  • Compare valuation ratios of firm to industry averages.
  • Ratios like price/sales are useful for valuing start-ups that have yet to generate positive earnings.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Limitations of Book Value

  • Book values are based on historical cost, not actual market values.
  • It is possible, but uncommon, for market value to be less than book value.
  • “Floor” or minimum value is the liquidation value per share.
  • Tobin’s q is the ratio of market price to replacement cost.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Intrinsic Value vs. Market Price

  • The return on a stock is composed of dividends and capital gains or losses.
  • The expected HPR may be more or less than the required rate of return, based on the stock’s risk.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Required Return

  • CAPM gives the required return, k:
  • If the stock is priced correctly, k should equal expected return.
  • k is the market capitalization rate.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Intrinsic Value and Market Price

  • The intrinsic value (IV) is the “true” value, according to a model.
  • The market value (MV) is the consensus value of all market participants

Trading Signal:

IV > MV Buy

IV < MV Sell or Short Sell

IV = MV Hold or Fairly Priced

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Dividend Discount Models (DDM)

  • V0 =current value; Dt=dividend at time t; k = required rate of return
  • The DDM says the stock price should equal the present value of all expected future dividends into perpetuity.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Constant Growth DDM

k= appropriate risk-adjusted interest rate

g= dividend growth rate

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Example 18.1 Preferred Stock and the DDM

  • No growth case
  • Value a preferred stock paying a fixed dividend of $2 per share when the discount rate is 8%:

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Example 18.2 Constant Growth DDM

  • A stock just paid an annual dividend of $3/share. The dividend is expected to grow at 8% indefinitely, and the market capitalization rate (from CAPM) is 14%.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

DDM Implications

  • The constant-growth rate DDM implies that a stock’s value will be greater:

The larger its expected dividend per share.

The lower the market capitalization rate, k.

The higher the expected growth rate of dividends.

  • The stock price is expected to grow at the same rate as dividends.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Estimating Dividend Growth Rates

g = growth rate in dividends

ROE = Return on Equity for the firm

b = plowback or retention percentage rate

(1- dividend payout percentage rate)

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Figure 18.1 Dividend Growth for Two Earnings Reinvestment Policies

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Present Value of Growth Opportunities

  • The value of the firm equals the value of the assets already in place, the no-growth value of the firm,
  • Plus the NPV of its future investments,
  • Which is called the present value of growth opportunities or PVGO.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Present Value of Growth Opportunities

  • Price = No-growth value per share + PVGO

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Example 18.4 Growth Opportunities

  • Firm reinvests 60% of its earnings in projects with ROE of 10%, capitalization rate is 15%. Expected year-end dividend is $2/share, paid out of earnings of $5/share.
  • g=ROE x b = 10% x .6 = 6%

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Example 18.4 Growth Opportunities

  • PVGO =Price per share – no-growth value per share

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Life Cycles and Multistage Growth Models

  • Expected dividends for Honda:

2013 $.78 2015 $ .92

2014 $.85 2016 $1.00

  • Since the dividend payout ratio is 25% and ROE is 10%, the “steady-state” growth rate is 7.5%.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Honda Example

  • Honda’s beta is 0.95 and the risk-free rate is 2%. If the market risk premium is 8%, then k is:
  • k=2% + 0.95(8%) = 9.6%
  • Therefore:

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Honda Example

  • Finally,
  • In 2012, one share of Honda Motor Company Stock was worth $32.88.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Price-Earnings Ratio and Growth

  • The ratio of PVGO to E / k is the ratio of firm value due to growth opportunities to value due to assets already in place (i.e., the no-growth value of the firm, E / k ).

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Price-Earnings Ratio and Growth

  • When PVGO=0, P0=E1 / k. The stock is valued like a nongrowing perpetuity.
  • P/E rises dramatically with PVGO.
  • High P/E indicates that the firm has ample growth opportunities.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Price-Earnings Ratio and Growth

  • P/E increases:
  • As ROE increases
  • As plowback increases, as long as ROE>k

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Table 18.3 Effect of ROE and Plowback on Growth and the P/E Ratio

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

P/E and Growth Rate

  • Wall Street rule of thumb: The growth rate is roughly equal to the P/E ratio.
  • “If the P/E ratio of Coca Cola is 15, you’d expect the company to be growing at about 15% per year, etc. But if the P/E ratio is less than the growth rate, you may have found yourself a bargain.”

Quote from Peter Lynch in One Up on Wall Street.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

P/E Ratios and Stock Risk

  • When risk is higher, k is higher; therefore, P/E is lower.

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Pitfalls in P/E Analysis

  • Use of accounting earnings
  • Earnings Management
  • Choices on GAAP
  • Inflation
  • Reported earnings fluctuate around the business cycle

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Figure 18.3 P/E Ratios of the S&P 500 Index and Inflation

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Figure 18.4 Earnings Growth for Two Companies

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Figure 18.6 P/E Ratios for Different Industries, 2012

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Other Comparative Value Approaches

  • Price-to-book ratio
  • Price-to-cash-flow ratio
  • Price-to-sales ratio

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Figure 18.7 Market Valuation Statistics

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Free Cash Flow Approach

  • Value the firm by discounting free cash flow at WACC.
  • Free cash flow to the firm, FCFF, equals:

After tax EBIT

Plus depreciation

Minus capital expenditures

Minus increase in net working capital

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Comparing the Valuation Models

  • In practice
  • Values from these models may differ
  • Analysts are always forced to make simplifying assumptions
  • Problems with DCF
  • Calculations are sensitive to small changes in inputs
  • Growth opportunities and growth rates are hard to pin down

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

The Aggregate Stock Market

  • Use of earnings multiplier approach at aggregate level
  • Some analysts use aggregate version of DDM
  • S&P 500 taken as leading economic indicator

18-*

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

Table 18.4 S&P 500 Price Forecasts Under Various Scenarios

1100()()Expected HPR= ()EDEPPErP

()fMfkrErr

(

)

(

)

...

1

1

1

3

3

2

2

1

0

+

+

+

+

+

+

=

k

D

k

D

k

D

V

(

)

g

k

D

g

k

g

D

V

-

=

-

+

=

1

0

0

1

25$

008.0

2$

oV

54

$

08

.

14

.

24

.

3

$

1

0

=

-

=

-

=

g

k

D

V

b

ROE

g

x

=

10EPPVGOk

22

.

22

$

06

.

15

.

2

$

0

=

-

=

P

22

.

22

$

06

.

15

.

2

$

0

=

-

=

P

11

.

11

$

15

.

5

$

22

.

22

$

-

=

-

=

PVGO

(

)

(

)

19

.

51

$

075

.

0

096

.

0

075

.

1

1

$

1

2016

2017

2016

=

-

=

-

+

=

-

=

g

k

g

D

g

k

D

P

4

3

2

2012

096

.

1

19

.

51

$

1

$

096

.

1

92

.

0

$

096

.

1

85

.

0

$

096

.

1

78

.

0

$

+

+

+

+

=

V

÷

÷

ø

ö

ç

ç

è

æ

+

=

k

E

PVGO

k

E

P

1

1

1

0

b

ROE

k

b

E

P

x

1

1

0

-

-

=

1PbEkg