Interprofessional education reflection paper 3 pages
ckducoeur
IPEReflectionInstructions2020.docx
Reflection
The IPEC Core Competencies1
· Competency 1 - Values/Ethics: Work with individuals of other professions to maintain a climate of mutual respect and shared values.
· Competency 2 - Roles/Responsibilities: Use the knowledge of one’s own role and those of other professions to appropriately assess and address the health care needs of patients and to promote and advance the health of populations.
· Competency 3 - Interprofessional Communication: Communicate with patients, families, communities, and professionals in health and other fields in a responsive and responsible manner that supports a team approach to the promotion and maintenance of health and the prevention and treatment of disease.
· Competency 4 - Teams and Teamwork: Apply relationship-building values and the principles of team dynamics to perform effectively in different team roles to plan, deliver, and evaluate patient/population-centered care and population health programs and policies that are safe, timely, efficient, effective, and equitable.
Directions
Students will write a reflection describing their individual experiences with interprofessional education between the School of Pharmacy and the School of Nursing. The reflection will be 2-4 pages, not including the title page or reference page, written in APA-format, using Times New Roman 12-point font, with 1” margins. The paper must include a title page, introduction, body, conclusion, and references. The content of the paper will be guided by the questions listed below. The grading rubric is attached.
1. Prior to the two interprofessional education (IPE) classes, what were your impressions of your role as a pharmacist on the healthcare team? The role of the pharmacist?
2. Describe an “a-ha!” moment you experienced during the IPE sessions/classes.
3. Describe what you learned during the IPE sessions/classes related to each of the IPEC competencies.
4. How did the IPE classes impact your personal growth as a professional?
5. How you will apply what you learned about interprofessional practice to your role on the healthcare team?
6. What would you like to add about this experience that has not been addressed in the above question?
References
1Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 Update. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.ipecollaborative.org/resources.html
|
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION REFLECTIVE PRACTICE |
|||||
|
Evaluation Criteria |
A |
B |
C |
D / F |
Comments/Points Earned |
|
Grammar & Mechanics
|
The writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors and exhibits standard usage. The writer demonstrates excellent editing skills. (9-10 points) |
The writing is generally free of grammatical and/or spelling errors and exhibits standard usage. The writer demonstrates good editing skills. (6-8 points) |
The writing has noticeable grammatical and/or spelling errors; inconsistencies with standard usage. Paper is not carefully edited. (3-5 points) |
The paper has significant grammatical and/or spelling errors and exhibits poor standard usage. Paper is not carefully edited. (1-2 points) |
|
|
APA Style & Use of Scholarly Literature
Please Note: Plagiarism in any form will result in an automatic F, no matter how well the paper is written. Please see specifics about this policy in the Student Handbook. |
The writer uses current and varied sources to support their own thoughts and ideas; the sources are credible, reliable, and scholarly; direct quotes are used sparingly and appropriately. Cover page, headings, in-text citations, reference page, and so forth align with APA 6th edition. (9-10 points) |
The writer generally uses current and varied sources to support their own thoughts and ideas; the sources generally are credible, reliable, and scholarly; direct quotes are sometimes used excessively or inappropriately. Cover page, headings, in-text citations, reference page, and so forth generally align with APA 6th edition. (6-8 points) |
The writer inconsistently uses current and varied sources to support their own thoughts and ideas; the sources are inconsistently credible, reliable, and scholarly; direct quotes are used excessively or inappropriately. Cover page, headings, in-text citations, reference page, and so forth inconsistently align with APA 6th edition. (3-5 points) |
The writer rarely uses current and varied sources to support their own thoughts and ideas; the sources rarely are credible, reliable, and scholarly; direct quotes are used excessively or inappropriately. Cover page, headings, in-text citations, reference page, and so forth rarely/never align with APA 6th edition. (1-2 points) |
|
|
Organization |
Paper includes clear introduction, thesis statement, systematic development of ideas/arguments, smooth transitions, and a conclusion/ summary. The writing is consistently fluent, clear, coherent, and clearly focused.
(9-10 points) |
Paper generally includes clear introduction, thesis statement, systematic development of ideas/arguments, smooth transitions, and a conclusion/ summary. The writing is generally fluent, clear, coherent, and clearly focused. (6-8 points) |
Paper inconsistently includes clear introduction, thesis statement, systematic development of ideas/arguments, smooth transitions, and a conclusion/ summary. The writing is inconsistently fluent, clear, coherent, and clearly focused. (3-5 points) |
Paper rarely includes clear introduction, thesis statement, systematic development of ideas/arguments, smooth transitions, and a conclusion/ summary. The writing is rarely/ never fluent, clear, coherent, and clearly focused. (1-2 points) |
|
|
Content |
The writing consistently demonstrates mastery of subject matter; depth of insight; clear analysis of issues; and synthesis of appropriate data to support key points. The writer consistently weaves together personal observations and practice experiences, when appropriate. (9-10 points) |
The writing generally demonstrates mastery of subject matter; depth of insight; clear analysis of issues; and synthesis of appropriate data to support key points. The writer generally weaves together personal observations and practice experiences, when appropriate. (6-8 points)
|
The writing inconsistently demonstrates mastery of subject matter; depth of insight; clear analysis of issues; and synthesis of appropriate data to support key points. The writer inconsistently weaves together personal observations and practice experiences, when appropriate. (3-5points) |
The writing rarely demonstrates mastery of subject matter; depth of insight; clear analysis of issues; and synthesis of appropriate data to support key points. The writer rarely weaves together personal observations and practice experiences, when appropriate. (1-2 points) |
|
|
Creativity & Originality of Thought |
The writing consistently demonstrates original thinking and intellectual curiosity; Summary/conclusion is insightful. (9-10 points) |
The writing generally demonstrates original thinking and intellectual curiosity; Summary/conclusion is generally insightful. (6-8 points) |
The writing inconsistently demonstrates original thinking and intellectual curiosity; Summary/conclusion lacks insight. (3-5 points) |
The writing rarely demonstrates original thinking and intellectual curiosity; Summary/conclusion lacks insight/is not present. (1-2 points) |
|
|
Total Points
|
______/50 |
