Psychology Psychology research assignment 2

profilesyqaa
IntroductiontoGroupDynamics.ppt


Introduction to Group Dynamics
Chapter 1

*

Overview

  • What is a group?
  • Types of groups
  • What are some common characteristics & descriptors of groups?
  • Group Dynamics: What assumptions guide researchers in their studies of groups and the processes within groups?
  • What fields and what topics are included in the scientific study of group dynamics?

*

  • Definition:
  • Two or more individuals who are connected to one another by and within social relationships.
  • Definitions of groups vary, but they do have common characteristics (page 4)
  • Size: dyads and triads to large collectives (this class, mobs, audiences)
  • Connected: members are linked, networked (e.g., a task at work) - social, interpersonal connection with someone (e.g., family)
  • Influential & purposeful

What is a Group?

*

  • Billions of groups in the world – most groups tend to be relatively small (ranging from 2 to 7 members)
  • Sociologist John James recorded the size of groups in Portland, Oregon (n = over 9000 from different settings – walking, shopping, playgrounds, etc.) and found that groups tend to gravitate to its smallest # = 2
  • No two groups are the same (they are unique in the characteristics – but groups do possess common characteristics
  • Groups are beneficial, but are also flawed
  • Not all group experiences are positive

What Is A Group

*

  • Categories – a collection of people or things that share a common attribute or are related in some way
  • Aggregate – a collection of individuals who are present in the same time and place but who do not form a unit
  • Collective – any aggregate of 2 or more people (larger, spontaneous, and loose association)
  • Groups and Aggregates can be psychologically fulfilling/satisfying
  • Moving from a category/aggregate to a group

Types of Groups

*

Types of Groups

  • Cooley (1909) drew a distinction between primary and secondary groups

  • Types of groups:
  • Primary (intimate associates that fuses individuals in a common whole)
  • Secondary (social groups)
  • Planned (concocted and founded)
  • Emergent (circumstantial and self-organizing)

*

(Cooley, 1909)

Types of Groups (cont’d)

Social groups such as congregations, work groups, unions, professional associations

Larger, less intimate, less commitment, more goal-focused groups typical of more complex societies

Secondary groups

Families, close friends, tight-knit peer groups, gangs, elite military squads

Small, long-term groups characterized by face-to-face interaction & high levels of cohesiveness, solidarity, & member identification

Primary groups

Examples

Characteristics

Type of Group

*

  • Cartwright and Zander (1960) were reluctant to classify groups as Cooley did – underestimated the complexity of groups
  • Planned Group – a group that is deliberately formed by its members or an external authority.
  • Emergent Group – a group can result from basically nothing
  • a group that is created gradually as individuals interact with the same subset of individuals.

Types of Groups (cont’d)

*

  • Arrow and her colleagues (2000) offer a more fine-grained analysis
  • planned vs. emergent

Types of Groups (cont’d)

Concocted

Founded

Circumstantial

Self-Organizing

*

Study groups, friendship cliques in a workplace, regular patrons at a bar – Example Prof. Tony Nield

Emerge when interacting individuals gradually align their activities in a cooperative system of interdependence.

Self-organizing

Waiting lines (queues), crowds, mobs, audiences, bystanders

Emergent, unplanned groups arising when external, situational forces set the stage for people to join together, often only temporarily, in a unified group

Circumstantial

Groups that form spontaneously as individuals find themselves repeatedly interacting with the same subset of individuals over time and settings

Emergent groups

Study groups, small businesses, clubs, associations

Planned by one or more individuals who remain within the group

Founded

Production lines, military units, task forces, crews, professional sports teams

Planned by individuals or authorities outside the group.

Concocted

Deliberately formed by the members themselves or by an external authority, usually for some specific purpose or purposes

Planned groups

Examples

Characteristics

Type of Group

*

  • Brian Lickel and colleagues presented 40 aggregates to U.S. & Polish undergraduate students
  • Wanted to examine how participants perceived group entities and compare them with one another (known as entiativity)
  • Used a 1 (not at all) to 9 likert scale (very much a group) on areas such as size, duration, intensity, etc.
  • Clustered the answers

Types of Groups (cont’d)

*

Types of Groups (cont’d)

*

Women, Asian Americans, physicians, U.S. citizens, New Yorkers

Aggregations of individuals similar to one another in terms of gender, ethnicity, religion, or nationality.

Categories

Crowds, audiences, clusters of bystanders

Aggregations of individuals that form spontaneously, last for brief periods, and have very permeable boundaries. Usual or unusual ways

Weak associations/

Collectives

Teams, neighborhood associations

Work groups in employment settings and goal-focused groups in a variety of non-employment situations

Social/Task groups

Families, romantic couples, close friends, street gangs

Small groups of moderate duration & permeability characterized by large levels of interaction amongst members, who value membership in the group

Intimacy/Primary groups

Examples

Characteristics

Type of Group

*

  • Influence of Size
  • Interaction: task and relationship
  • Interdependence: sequential, reciprocal, mutual
  • Structure: roles, norms, relations
  • Goals: generating, choosing, negotiating, executing
  • Perception of Membership

What are some common characteristics of groups?

*

  • Group size influences the structure and features of groups
  • Larger groups are connected to one another indirectly rather than directly (e.g., social media groups – LinkedIn) and are more permeable
  • At times with larger groups people are connected to the group as a whole (e.g., York University) or subgroups (3430) and not directly linked to all members of the group
  • While smaller groups have more direct ties (partners, parents, families)
  • Connection Equation n(n-1)/2

Characteristics of Groups - Size

*

  • Groups are systems that create, organize, and sustain interaction among members
  • What do people do in groups? – words, actions, instruction, support, emotions
  • Task Interaction – actions performed by individuals pertaining to group’s tasks and goals (long term & short term)
  • Different types of goals – process goals (e.g., discussion), performance (task), intellectual (decision making)
  • Relationship Interaction – actions performed by the group relating to emotional and interpersonal bonds
  • As groups increase in size the more task and relationship interaction is needed

Characteristics of Groups - Interaction

*

Characteristics of Groups - Goals

  • Groups often strive towards common tasks/outcomes
  • McGrath’s Circumplex Model of Group Tasks (2 dimensions – conflict/cooperation & conceptual/behavioural)
  • 4 Quadrants specifying task performance
  • Generating – something is created/produced
  • Choosing – selecting (from alternatives)
  • Negotiation – group resolves conflict
  • Executing – requires action

*

*

  • Groups are systems that create, organize, and sustain interaction among members
  • What do people do in groups? – words, actions, instruction, support, emotions
  • Task Interaction – actions performed by individuals pertaining to group’s tasks and goals (long term & short term)
  • Different types of goals – process goals (e.g., discussion), performance (task), intellectual (decision making)
  • Relationship Interaction – actions performed by the group relating to emotional and interpersonal bonds
  • As groups increase in size the more task and relationship interaction is needed

Characteristics of Groups - Interaction

*

  • Experiences (emotions, actions, communication, etc.) are determined by other members of the group and vice versa
  • Unilateral – one person influencing another
  • Sequential – influence of one member to the next (flat/symmetrical or hierarchical).
  • Reciprocal – two or more members may influence each other – relationship might be unequal
  • Multilevel – the outcome of larger groups are influenced by the activities of smaller groups (subgroups)
  • As groups increase in size and complexity they become more formal, subgroups form

Characteristics of Groups - Interdependence

*

Interdependence Diagram

*

  • Groups’ structure are often organized in predictable patterns

  • Roles – set of behaviours expected of people who occupy certain positions

  • Norms – a consensual standard that describes what behaviours should and should not be performed in a given context

Characteristics of Groups - Structure

*

  • Group Cohesion: the strength of the bonds linking individuals to the group

  • Carron, Brawley, and Widmeyer (1998) defined cohesion as “a dynamic process that is reflected in the tendency of a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or for the satisfaction of member needs

  • Attraction to specific group members and efforts to achieve goals

Cohesiveness

*

Donald Campbell’s Theory of Entitativity (1958)

  • Entitativity is perceived groupness rather than an aggregation of independent, unrelated individuals
  • Gestalt principles = groups are more than the some of its parts

Common Fate – do individuals experience the same outcomes?

Similarity – do individual perform similar behaviours or resemble one another

Proximity – how close together are the individuals in the group

More Grouplike?

*

Perception of Membership

  • Membership – the amount someone perceives themselves to be part, or included within a group
  • People are not part of a group unless they perceive themselves to be part of the group
  • Thomas Theorem – if people define a group as real, then it has real consequences (W.I. Thomas, 1928)
  • Minimal groups paradigm (Tajfel et al., 1971) – split into meaningless groups (Overestimaters vs. Underestimater of jellybeans, # of dots, etc.) – clear favouritism for their group, emotional attachment to the group

*

… the "field of inquiry dedicated to advancing knowledge about the nature of groups" (Cartwright & Zander, 1968)

The influential action, processes, and changes that occur within & between groups (Forsyth, p. 2)

  • people subjectively have talked/written about the nature of man’s place in society for centuries
  • A formal field of student emerged in the late 1800s
  • was slow to emerge – too complex, too simplistic, too private, lack of agreement by theorists/researchers, which level of analysis? lack of assessment?
  • Industrial revolution, democracy, technology (led by developed countries = U.S.A.)

Group Dynamics

*

  • Group dynamics is a relatively young field –

talk about for many years, yet emerged in the 1930s-1940's

  • Rooted in many fields – psychology, sociology, anthropology, business, sport
  • Norman Triplett (1898) – social facilitation

Creating the Field

*

Introduction to Group Dynamics

… a "field of inquiry dedicated to advancing knowledge about the nature of groups"

(Cartwright & Zander, 1968, p. 7).

*

*

Exchange of background personal

information, uncertainty, tentative communication

Dissatisfaction, disagreement, challenges to leader and procedures, cliques form

Cohesiveness, agreement on procedures , standards, and roles, improved communication

Focus on the work of the group, task

completion, decision making, cooperation

Departures, withdrawal,

decreased dependence, regret

Tuckman’s theory of group development

*

Larger view 

*