Interview Summary
smartswan
InterviewSummary.pdf
Interview Summary by Kelechi Onyekwere
Submission date: 07-Jul-2021 10:29PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1616967914 File name: le_temp_turnitintool_1220362161.Interview_Summary_Onyekwere.docx (16.45K) Word count: 357 Character count: 1726
Welcome
Awk.
1 2
3
4
56Awk. underline thesis
introductory comma
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
1/1 Interview Summary GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Dear Kelechi,
This inerview lacks a focus. Frame a thesis including the main idea and the points covered in the interview.
Explain each point in detail. Explain how each idea is related to your research topic.
Please go through my comments in thesis, support, organization, punctuation, and format
DMK
PAGE 1
Welcome
Hello!
Good day! Glad to grade your paper today!
DMK
Awk. | Language Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.
QM
QM
QM
Comment 1 | Organization
This introduction is too brief.It provides useful information on the credibility of the inerviewee, but it requires more details on him as well as the research topic. Include some more information for a strong introduction.
Comment 2 | Organization
What is Grice been doing for the past thiry years? Which role or roles did he have in this field? What is the relevance of this person for this topic? Also, provide more information on the research topic in this interview. Include information on the resarch topic. How is the topic related to health care? Which aspect of health care does it refer to? Include some more details on this topic.
Comment 3 | Organization
Provide Background Information:In your introductory paragraph, introduce your audience to your interviewee. What is his/her name? What is his/her experience? If relevant, where is the interviewee employed?
Comment 4 | Thesis
No identifiable thesis. Frame a thesis explaining the main idea and the points covered during the interview.
Comment 5 | Thesis
Here is a template for your reference: Interview summary:
According to Miss ABC, euthanasia is misunderstood by many, and she explained this with the help of (point 1) (point 2) (point 3), during this interview.
Comment 6 | Thesis
What is the main idea of this interview? Which part of home nursing and nursing home care do you focus on in this interview? Which points on this topic did you cover during the interview? From these hints, frame a thesis for this essay.
Awk. | Language Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.
underline thesis | Format
Thesis not underlined.
introductory comma | Punctuation
Add a comma at the end of the introductory element occurring in the beginning of the sentence to separate it from the rest of the sentence.
Comment 7 | Support
What is the purpose of this paragraph? What are you trying to prove through this paragraph? What exactly is this process? Why is it not easy? Why is there a need for therapy among these patients? What difficulties does this possess for both the patient and th nurse? What is Grice's opinion on this topic? From these hints, provide meaningful support for this idea.
Comment 8 | Support
The explanation in this paragraph is confusing and requires more support. Explain the idea behind Grice's opinion. Why is it important fo rpatients to receive treatment in hospital? Why does he think it to be affordable? How is ti related to research topic? What is this reference to the tools? Which toolsdo they require? From these hints, develop more support for this idea.
Comment 9 | Support
Explain all the ideas in this paragraph with reference to the main idea. Explain how each pint is relevant and related to the focus of this interview.
Comment 10 | Support
The support for this interview is minimal. Include more details on this topic in the interview. Explain all the points in detail in relation to the research topic.
Comment 11 | Support
Summarize the Interview: While you want to avoid the all-too-predictable question and answer format, you should provide information about what you learned from the interview. Take a look at your original questions, group them into categories, and use those categories to build your body paragraph(s). Also, you may note the interviewee’s reactions in your summary as well. Was the interviewee nervous about answering a question? Did he/she seem knowledgeable in the subject matter? Make this summary work for you by including whatever details and responses you feel are important and will help you when you write the research proposal.
PAGE 2
Comment 12 | Organization
This conclusion sums up the points discussed in the interview, but still requires more details to provide a strong closure for this essay.
Include the new insight did this interview gave you. How did it give you a new perspective on your research topic? From these hints, frame a strong closure for this essay.
Comment 13 | Organization
Synthesize the Interview: In the conclusion, synthesize the interview. To synthesize just means you should consider all of the information you gathered from this interview and draw conclusions. What did you learn from the interview? How did the interviewee and/or the interview help you gain a deeper understanding of your topic? Other findings?
RUBRIC: ENG 102 MH V 3 INTERVIEW_DRAFT
THESIS
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
SUPPORT
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
ORGANIZATION
INADEQUATE
Inadequate
Thesis & Focus Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, focus
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers cannot discern the interview’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the interview. Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the interview.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire interview. Interview demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout.
Below Average
Support & Development Thesis support and topic development
Little-to-no thesis support or topic development.
Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate. Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning.
More support is needed. Some examples may be vague. More development needed for supporting reasons or evidence. Some irrelevant support may be present, but most evidence supports thesis.
Support is sufficient but perhaps flawed in some way. Examples are sufficient. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs.
Interview completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement of evidence. All assertions are supported and relate to thesis.
Below Average
Coherence & Organization: Introduction, conclusion, body paragraphs, transitions, topic sentences
No clear introduction, body, or conclusion. Little-to-no transitions. Demonstrates little-to-no understanding of organization. Many sentences within paragraphs do
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
LANGUAGE
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
GRAMMAR
not relate to each other and/or the paragraph’s topic. May contain no discernible topic sentences.
Introduction, body, and conclusion attempted but problematic. Few transitions. Perhaps numerous digressions. Mostly missing or problematic topic sentences. Demonstrates little understanding of organization.
Identifiable introduction, body, and conclusion; yet one significant weakness is present: undeveloped introduction, undeveloped conclusion, illogical paragraph order. Adequate transitions, perhaps some digressions. Some paragraphs may lack clear topic sentences. Demonstrates basic understanding of organization.
Clear introduction, body, and conclusion: Introduction provides background information, body summarizes interview, and conclusion synthesizes interview very effectively. Good transitions. Good organizational style.
Clear, effective introduction, body, and conclusion: Introduction provides background, body summarizes interview, and conclusion synthesizes interview very effectively. Clear and effective transitions are present throughout the interview. Excellent organizational style.
Superior
Language & Style: Word choice, repetition, redundancy, awkwardness, article misuse, wrong word form (their/there, etc.), typos/misspellings, vocabulary
May contain more than 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain more than 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Fails to demonstrate competent language use; sentences and vocabulary are inappropriate, facile, and/or incoherent.
May contain 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Contains repetitive, incorrect, and/or insufficient sentence structure and/or limited vocabulary.
May contain 4 – 5 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates competency with language use but sentence constructions and vocabulary may be limited or repetitive.
May contain 2 – 3 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sufficient knowledge and skill with varied sentence construction and vocabulary. Unnecessary repetition is minor.
May contain 1 error in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 1 error in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and skill with varied and complex sentence construction and vocabulary. Little-to-no unnecessary repetition.
Superior
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
PUNCTUATION
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
FORMAT
INADEQUATE
BELOW AVERAGE
AVERAGE
Grammar: Fragments, subject-verb agreement, verb tense errors, verb form errors, run-ons, pronoun agreement
Contains more than 5 different grammar errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 4 – 5 different grammar errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 2 – 3 different grammar errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 1 grammar error, which may be repeated throughout the essay.
Contains either no grammar errors, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition.
Superior
Punctuation & Capitalization: Comma errors, comma splices, apostrophe errors, capitalization errors, semicolon errors, colon errors
Contains more than 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 4 – 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 2 – 3 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout.
Contains 1 punctuation/capitalization error, which may be repeated throughout the essay.
Contains either no punctuation/capitalization error, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition.
Superior
Format: heading, title, margins, spacing, length, underlined thesis, other assignment-specific required elements. Length minimum of 350 words.
Doesn’t meet formatting requirements: Formatting may be missing four or more elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements.
Doesn’t meet most formatting requirements: Formatting may be missing three elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements.
Meets some formatting requirements: Formatting may be missing two elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements (an essay that does not meet length minimum will score no higher than 3 in this category)
ABOVE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR
Meets most formatting requirements: Formatting may be missing one element (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length meets minimum requirements of 350 words.
Meets all requirements. Formatting is appropriate in terms of heading, title, margins, spacing, underlining thesis. Length meets minimum requirements of 350 words.
