Interview and Leadership Analysis

7/27/2021 Interview and Leadership Analysis Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NHS/NHS8040/200700/Scoring_Guides/u03a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Interview and Leadership Analysis Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 3 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Evaluate the primary leadership style of a selected leader in a health care management position.

17%

Does not evaluate the primary leadership style of a selected leader in a health care management position.

Describes but does evaluate the primary leadership style of a selected leader in a health care management position.

Evaluates the primary leadership style of a selected leader in a health care management position.

Evaluates the primary leadership style of a selected leader in a health care management position; notes strengths and growth opportunities.

Assess a leader’s role in an organization as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence- based standards.

17%

Does not assess a leader’s role in an organization as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence- based standards.

Assesses a leader’s role in an organization as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence- based standards but the discussion is unclear or incomplete.

Assesses a leader’s role in an organization as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence- based standards.

Assesses a leader’s role in an organization as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence-based standards; provides relevant examples of successes, strategies, or best practices that support assertions.

Explain the rationale for the selection of a leader to serve as a preceptor.

17%

Does not explain the rationale for the selection of a leader to serve as a preceptor.

Identifies a leader but does not explain the rationale for the selection of the leader to serve as a preceptor.

Explains the rationale for the selection of a leader to serve as a preceptor.

Explains the rationale for the selection of a leader to serve as a preceptor and provides a qualitative evaluation of the selected leader's qualifications and accomplishments.

Identify a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project.

17%

Does not identify a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project.

Identifies a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project but the work is unclear or incomplete.

Identifies a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project.

Identifies a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project that is clear, concise, and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Summarize a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight regarding the ethical use of organizational information. 16%

Does not summarize a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight regarding the ethical use of organizational information.

Partially describes a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight regarding the ethical use of organizational information.

Summarizes a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight regarding the ethical use of organizational information.

Summarizes a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight regarding the ethical use of organizational information, including specific examples to support assertions.

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

16%

Does not convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style. Does not incorporate supporting evidence nor adhere to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.