interprofessional collaboration
Interprofessional Collaboration Scoring Guide
|
CRITERIA |
NON-PERFORMANCE |
BASIC |
PROFICIENT |
DISTINGUISHED |
|
Analyze the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. |
Does not describe the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. |
Describes the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. |
Analyzes the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. |
Analyzes the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue, identifying information gaps and alternative scenarios, adding depth to the analysis. |
|
Explain the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. |
Does not explain the need for interprofessional collaboration in a broad context applicable in any interdisciplinary setting. |
Explains the need for interprofessional collaboration in a broad context applicable in any interdisciplinary setting. |
Explains the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. |
Explains the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Presents an accurate and unbiased representation of the issue. Proposed team composition is ideal, given the nature and complexity of the relevant quality and safety issues. |
|
Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. |
Does not assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. |
Assesses the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships, but overlooks relevant information or makes unsubstantiated claims. |
Assesses the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. |
Assesses the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships, and draws well-reasoned, unbiased conclusions from available evidence. |
|
Develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. |
Does not develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. |
Develops a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders, but the plan overlooks important details or the substance and methods of communication are insufficient to fully address stakeholder needs. |
Develops a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. |
Develops a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. Strategy addresses the unique needs and perspectives of all stakeholders and is effective in providing timely, accurate, and actionable information that enables effective decision making and facilitates feedback. |
|
Determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. |
Does not determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. |
Determines the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects, but overlooks key leadership functions having a direct impact on project success. |
Determines the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. |
Determines the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. Clearly defines the leader’s duties, responsibilities, and value to the project in consideration of the complexity of proposed solutions, relevant contextual factors, and expected outcomes. |
|
Determine how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. |
Does not describe the practitioner-scholar model. |
Describes the practitioner-scholar model or argues ineffectively for how the model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. |
Determines how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. |
Determines how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue; makes explicit and insightful connections and inferences in skillfully integrating scholarship and practice. |
|
Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting. |
Does not write coherently to support a central idea, and does not use correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting. |
Writes to support a central idea, but writing includes logical inconsistencies or errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA formatting. |
Writes coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting. |
Writes clearly, coherently, and persuasively to support a central idea; grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting are error free. |