Writing about interpersonal communications within a specific culture (TANZANIA)

25 to >20.0 pts

Focused, clear, accurate and specific discussion of the chosen country. Includes relevant history and economic background.

20 to >17.0 pts

Discussion of chosen country may be clear, but somewhat unfocused, inaccurate or unspecific. Includes both history and economic background.

17 to >14.0 pts

Discussion of chosen country is unclear. Ambiguous, inaccurate and/or lacks focus. Includes at least relevant history or economic background.

14 to >0.0 pts

Lacks focus, clarity, accuracy and specificity of connection to chosen country. Does not discuss both history and economic background.

0 pts

No Marks

25 to >20.0 pts

Focused, clear, accurate and specific discussion of the chosen country. Includes relevant social class, roles of religious institutions, and gender norms.

20 to >17.0 pts

Discussion of chosen country background may be clear, but somewhat unfocused, inaccurate, or unspecific. Includes relevant social class, roles of religious institutions, and gender norms.

17 to >14.0 pts

Discussion of chosen country is unclear. Ambiguous, inaccurate and/or lacks focus. Includes relevant information about one or two of the areas.

14 to >0.0 pts

Lacks focus, clarity, accuracy and specificity of connection to chosen country. Includes relevant information of at least one area.

0 pts

No Marks

50 to >44.0 pts

Discussion of the tool to be used in analysis is clear, specific, and focused. Includes enough information that readers not familiar with the textbook would be able to understand. Analysis is focused, specific, and relates specifically to the material given in the background sections. Conclusions drawn make sense. Original conclusions are made.

44 to >38.0 pts

Discussion of the tools used might be inaccurate or unspecific. Includes enough detail that readers not familiar would understand generally what is being talked about, but may not fully understand. Analysis is adequate but may not follow from material previously presented. Conclusions drawn may not make complete sense based on background information given, but common sense says they are accurate. Some original conclusions are drawn.

38 to >34.0 pts

Discussion of tools is limited, inaccurate, or unspecific. Does not include enough information that a reader unfamiliar will be able to understand. Analysis is lacking. May not be accurate or may not make sense based on the information presented in background sections. Original conclusions are lacking - information is all from other sources.

34 to >0.0 pts

Discussion of tools is lacking and may not be clear or accurate if included. Analysis is unoriginal if included. May not make sense based on other information presented.

0 pts

No Marks

20 to >17.0 pts

Minimal grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

17 to >14.0 pts

Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Readability not hindered by minor mistakes.

14 to >12.0 pts

A few grammatical spelling or punctuation errors. Portions of the writing are unclear because of mistakes.

12 to >0.0 pts

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Readability severely hindered by excessive mistakes.

0 pts

No Marks

20 to >17.0 pts

Paper includes an introduction and conclusion. Information is organized with well-constructed sentences and paragraphs. Clearly addresses requisite items. Allows for thoughtful reflection. Paper utilizes MLA format correctly throughout. Paper is roughly 1000 minimum.

17 to >14.0 pts

Paper includes introduction and conclusion. Information is somewhat organized with well-constructed sentences and paragraphs. Does not thoroughly address requisite items and provides superficial reflection. Paper utilizes MLA format throughout with minimal errors. Paper is at least 750 words.

14 to >12.0 pts

Paper includes introduction and conclusion but they do not successfully fulfill the functions. Information is somewhat disorganized. Paragraphs are not well-constructed. Writing is hard to follow because of structure. Questions might be left unanswered. Paper utilizes MLA format in-text or on bibliography. May not be correctly cited. Paper is at least 500 words.

12 to >0.0 pts

Paper does not include both introduction and conclusion. The information is quite disorganized. Large parts of the writing display a lack of thoughtful response. MLA is not used correctly in-text and/or on the bibliography or bibliography is missing. Paper is at least 500 words.

0 pts

No Marks

10 to >6.0 pts

Presentation is effective. Information shared over each section of the paper. Able to discuss with confidence and authority and answer any questions as they arise.

6 to >4.0 pts

Presentation is adequate. Information shared over the majority of the sections of the paper. Able to discuss with sufficient ability. Answers most questions as they arise.

4 to >2.0 pts

Presentation is lacking. Some information from paper is shared. Timid or unsure of self and information presented. Unable to answer all questions asked.

2 to >0.0 pts

Presentation lacking in information. Unable to share most of the information that was required by the paper. Delivery of information is suspect - does not have confidence or authority over the subject. Is unable to answer questions about the topic.

0 pts

No Marks