Construct a PICO(T) question (step 1 in the EBP process).

2/9/2021 Integrating and Implementing Evidence to Address a Health Care Challenge Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NHS/NHS8065/200400/Scoring_Guides/u05a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2

Integrating and Implementing Evidence to Address a Health Care Challenge Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Week 5 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Construct a PICO(T) question.

15%

Does not construct a PICO(T) question.

Constructs a PICO(T) question in which one or more of the PICO(T) elements is misidentified.

Constructs a PICO(T) question.

Constructs a PICO(T) question. Applies PICO(T) components within the question appropriately, and refines PICO(T) components with the appropriate level of detail and specificity.

Implement a search strategy for the best evidence.

15%

Does not implement a search strategy for the best evidence.

Implements an ineffective search strategy that does not yield the best evidence, based on a PICOT question.

Implements a search strategy for the best evidence

Implements a search strategy for the best evidence that is clearly based on the PICO(T) question and on appropriate study methods and designs with the best evidence. Explains the criteria used for identifying the best evidence, and executes a search of appropriate databases, using appropriate search terms.

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge.

14%

Does not evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge.

Provides unsubstantiated claims about the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge.

Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge.

Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge. Chooses an appropriate critical appraisal tool and justifies the criteria used to evaluate the evidence.

Interpret evidence and its implications in relation to a health care challenge.

14%

Does not interpret evidence in relation to a health care challenge.

Interprets evidence in relation to a health care challenge.

Interprets evidence and its implications in relation to a health care challenge.

Interprets evidence and its implications in relation to a health care challenge. Identifies significant and relevant implications, based on a perceptive and coherent synthesis of sufficient best evidence for a PICO(T) question.

Recommend a strategy to implement an evidence-based intervention in a PICO(T) question.

14%

Does not recommend a strategy to implement an evidence- based intervention in a PICO(T) question.

Recommends an unsubstantiated strategy to implement an evidence-based intervention in a PICO(T) question.

Recommends a strategy to implement an evidence- based intervention in a PICO(T) question.

Recommends a strategy to implement an evidence-based intervention in a PICO(T) question. The strategy is well- supported by an insightful synthesis and interpretation of the research evidence.

2/9/2021 Integrating and Implementing Evidence to Address a Health Care Challenge Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NHS/NHS8065/200400/Scoring_Guides/u05a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of a research study to improve practice.

14%

Does not explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of a research study to improve practice.

Explains how the findings of a research study can be applied to improve practice, irrespective of interprofessional collaboration and communication.

Explains how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of a research study to improve practice.

Explains how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of a research study to improve practice and draws well-reasoned conclusions based on clearly articulated study implications and insight into the efficacy of interprofessional collaboration and communication in improving practice.

Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.

14%

Does not synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.

Cites multiple sources with no clear indication of key themes or findings.

Synthesizes multiple sources into key themes or findings.

Synthesizes multiple sources into fully- developed key themes or findings that support a clearly discernable thesis or central idea of the work.