for perfecto

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.

Critical Elements

Exemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Research Plan: Gap

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates an advanced ability to identify gaps in research 20 / 20

Research Plan: Research Question

Meets “criteria, and developed research question demonstrates a keen insight into how to develop research questions that address gaps in research 20 / 20

Research Design: Research Design

Does not determine a research design that addresses the research question

0 / 20

Criterion Feedback

I could not provide any points here as you were wrong on many levels:

1) not qualitative

2) not descriptive, but correlational

3) IV and DV are only designated for an experiment

4) There are more than 2 types of design for descriptive research

Research Design: Issues of Ethics

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates an astute ability to account for issues of ethics within proposed research design 15 / 15

Research Design: Informed

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight regarding how issues of ethics are accounted for in various scenarios 15 / 15

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format 10 / 10