Literature Search, Rapid Critical Appraisal, and Summary

InstructionsRESEARCHINNURSINGWEEK6ASSIGNMENT.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >Literature Search, Rapid Critical Appraisal, and Summary

TOPIC: Fall RISK IN ELDERLY PATIENTS, HOSPITAL SETTING

ASSISGNMENT IS TO WRITE A ONE PAGE SUMMARY ON EACH ARTICLE. IN TOTAL THERE WILL BE TWO ARTICLES (ONE FOR A QUALITATIVE ARTICLE AND ONE FOR A QUANTITATIVE ARTICLE) THESE TWO ARTICLES WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FILES SECTION. USE THE RUBRIC BELOW TO COMPLETE THE SUMMARY OF EACH ARTICLE.

QUANTITATIVE ARTICLE TITLE (LOCATED IN FILES SECTION): Examining the Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Inpatient Hospital Falls: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

QUALITATIVE ARTICLE TITLE (LOCATED IN FILES SECTION) : A qualitative study of the determinants of adherence to NICE falls guideline in managing older fallers attending an emergency department

· Write a summary (one page for each article)

· In the summary identify differences in article designs and research methods. Describe the differences in your articles designs and methods. Carefully review the rubric before you submit. This summary is using your own words to examine the differences specifically between the articles. (RUBRIC TO FOLLOW IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE)

· Use current APA style for your summary paper and to cite your sources.

· NURS_350_OL - NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid ≥÷Critical Appraisal Checklists

NURS_350_OL - NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies.

10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Two quality, substantive articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are suitable original research studies.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Two articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are mostly substantive, but at least one is not a suitable original research study, or is not sufficiently substantive.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations

One article is selected and identified as qualitative or quantitative research, or it is not a suitable original research study.

5.9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Articles are not original research; one qualitative and one quantitative article are not identified.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the research problem and purpose of each research article

40 to >35.6 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

The research problem and the purpose for each article are expertly examined.

35.6 to >30.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

The research problem and the purpose for each article are adequately examined with minor omissions or errors.

30 to >23.6 pts

Below Expectations

The research problem and the purpose for each article are vague, absent or not identified, and contain major omissions or errors.

23.6 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The research problem and its purpose are not identified for any of the articles.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the research methods for each research article

30 to >26.7 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

An extensive description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is clearly presented for each article.

26.7 to >22.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

An adequate description of the, variables, the sample, and the research methods is presented for most articles with minor omissions or errors.

22.5 to >17.7 pts

Below Expectations

An unsatisfactory description of the variables, sample, and the research methods is presented for both articles with major omissions or errors.

17.7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

A description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is not presented for any of the articles.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article

40 to >35.6 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

An expertly examined investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is skillfully presented for each article.

35.6 to >30.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

An adequate investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both is satisfactorily presented with minor omissions or errors.

30 to >23.6 pts

Below Expectations

An unsatisfactory investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is provided with major omissions or errors, or only one of the articles is investigated and presented satisfactorily.

23.6 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

A description of the findings, themes, and conclusions, is not presented for either article.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the similarities and differences among the research articles

60 to >53.4 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough.

53.4 to >45.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is adequate with minor omissions or errors.

45 to >35.4 pts

Below Expectations

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is inadequate with major omissions or errors.

35.4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is not provided.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Uses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations

Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited, or there are many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

5.9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, includes sufficient details, and is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations

The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper

5.9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.

10 pts

Total Points: 200