HR Assignment?
Use the table provided or create one of your own using the program of your choice—MS Word, MS Excel, etc.—to define each selection method. Explain the nature of the method and its importance. Then list all the advantages and disadvantages for each selection method. Use as many references as necessary (minimum of 4) to support your explanations and the advantages and disadvantages.
In a separate short report (2-3 pages), recommend the most appropriate selection method or combination of selection methods for this case study, explaining your rationale. Present at least 3 scholarly sources to support your rationale using APA format.
1 Cover Page with Name, Date, and Title of Assignment
2 Use headings to separate the sections of the report
3 Page numbers
4 Double-spacing
5 Times New Roman, size 12
6 In-text citations to sources in APA style
7 Reference page using APA style
8 References not older than 3 years old
RUBRIC
|
Criteria 1 |
Advanced 0.75 points |
Satisfactory 0.65 points |
Partial 0.55 points |
Not Satisfactory 0 points |
|
Definition and Explanation of Psychometric tests |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of Resume or curriculum vitae review |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of Formal (Structured) Interview |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
|
Definition and Explanation of Informal Interview |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of Teaching Observation |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of Presentation to candidates to a panel of teachers |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of Online Testing |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Definition and Explanation of References |
Accurate definition and comprehensive explanation. |
Accurate definition and sufficient explanation. |
Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description. |
Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation. |
|
Criteria 2 |
Advanced 0.75 points |
Satisfactory 0.65 points |
Partial 0.55 points |
Not Satisfactory 0 points |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Psychometric tests |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Resume or curriculum vitae review |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Formal (Structured) Interview |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Informal Interview |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Teaching Observation |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Presentation to candidates to a panel of teachers |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of Online Testing |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Advantages/ disadvantages of References |
All advantages/ disadvantages listed are accurate and complete. |
No more than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
More than two advantage/ disadvantages are missing or inaccurate. |
No advantages/ disadvantages listed. |
|
Criteria 3 |
Advanced 5 points |
Satisfactory 4.5 points |
Partial 4 points |
Not Satisfactory 0 points |
|
Recommendation of Selection Method |
Accurate and complete recommendation. Rationale is thoughtful and comprehensive. |
Accurate recommendation. Rationale supports recommendation. |
Accurate recommendation. Rationale is not complete. |
Inaccurate recommendation and/or rationale does not support recommendation. |
|
Criteria 4 |
Advanced 1.6 points |
Satisfactory 1.47 points |
Partial 1.39 points |
Not Satisfactory 0 points |
|
Use credible reasoning and evidence in communication. |
Concepts and ideas are fully developed and supported with credible sources. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning. |
Concepts and ideas are developed and supported with credible sources. |
Summary idea presentation is not cohesive. At times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought. |
Concepts and themes are not fully developed, presented in a cohesive manner or appropriately supported. |
|
Accurate use of resources |
Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Describes characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources. |
Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Does not describe all characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources. |
Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Limited characteristics of essential information and resources presented. |
Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. |
|
APA Guidelines for in-text citations and References |
The paper correctly cites in-text and lists three resources on the References page. If additional sources are used, they are included correctly. |
The majority of in-text citations and the reference are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases. |
References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines. |
Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations. |
|
Writing Mechanics |
Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling. No errors found. No jargon used. |
Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. One to three errors found.
|
Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found. |
Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over ten errors found. |
|
Followed Instructions |
Strictly adheres to the instructions for the assignment. Completes each section comprehensively. |
Adheres to the instructions for the assignment. Completes each section appropriately. |
Minimally adheres to the instructions. Doesn't complete each section appropriately or correctly. |
Does not adhere to the instructions. Does not complete each section. |
|
Overall Score |
A 22.5 or more |
B 20 or more |
C 17.5 or more |
Does not meet expectations 0 or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|