COM 110

This is a References List in APA format, but with added annotations, which say why you are choosing each source. It is a “working” list, which means it is not set in stone—you may need to or choose to use additional or different sources later.

Here's what you need to do:

Using the Annotated Working Bibliography Template, compile a list of all sources each member of your group will use in your project.  List resources for each group member separately in the document under the member's name as noted in the template.

For each source, you will need to include the source information (in APA References List format, with links to online sources; see the weekly resources for Purdue OWL’s helpful guide to compiling an APA-style References List).

Your annotations will answer the following questions:

· Why do you think this is source is important to include, and what do you expect this source will add to your knowledge of the topic?

· How do you know the source is authoritative and reputable?

You should note if the source is a scholarly (peer-reviewed) journal article or scholarly book chapter.  Make sure you understand what various types of sources look like (see the week’s resources including this guide from Cornell: Distinguishing Scholarly from Non-Scholarly Periodicals: A Checklist of Criteria: Introduction & Definitions).

Remember, you should be using authoritative and reputable sources.  When dealing with articles which are not scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles, these resources may help in critically evaluating sources:

· Critical Evaluation of Resources (UC Merced)

· Evaluating Web Pages (U C Berkeley)

· Assessing the Credibility of Online Sources (St. Cloud State U)