question answering due in 24 hours
BUSINESS SCHOOL
INFS2001 Information Systems for Performance Improvement Financial Reporting and Management
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Objectives for Financial Reporting and Management
› Understand the operational features of the General Ledger System(GLS), financial reporting system(FRS), and management reporting system(MRS).
› Be able to identify the principle operational controls governing the GLS and FRS.
› Be familiar with the financial reporting issues surrounding XBRL.
› Understand the factors that influence the design of the MRS.
› Understand the elements of a responsibility accounting system.
• The journal voucher is the source of input to the GL with the manager offering a degree of control against unauthorized GL entries.
GLS Database
› General ledger master file is the principal file in the GLS database and is based on the chart of accounts. - FRS draws upon the GL master to produce financial
statements.
GLS Database
› General ledger history file has the same format as the GL master. - Provides historical financial data for comparative reports.
› Journal voucher file provides a record of all GL transactions and replaces the traditional general journal.
› Journal voucher history file contains journal vouchers of past periods for the audit trail.
› Responsibility center file contains financial data by responsibility centers for MRS reporting.
› Budget master file contains budget data by responsibility center.
Financial Reporting Procedures
1 Capture the transaction. 2 & 3 Record in special journal and post to subsidiary ledger. 4, (7) & (10) Post to GL periodically. 5 Prepare unadjusted trial balance. 6 & 7 Make, journalize and post adjusting entries. 8 Prepare the adjusted trial balance. 9 Prepare the financial statements. 10 Journalize and post closing entries. 11 Prepare the post-closing trial balance.
Systems Flow Chart
Real-Time Systems Flow Chart – Using IT XBRL: Reengineering Financial Reporting
› Many companies post financial statements on their websites using HTML (Hyper Text Markup Language). - Cannot be conveniently processed through IT automation. - Performing analysis on data requires them to be manually
entered into the user’s information system. › The solution to the problems is XBRL (extensible
Business Reporting Language). - Internet standard designed for business reporting and
information exchange. - Objective is to facilitate the publication, exchange, and
processing of financial and business information. - Derivative of XML (extensible Markup Language).
XML
› XML is a meta-language for describing markup languages.
› Extensible means that any markup language can be created using XML. - Includes the creation of markup languages capable of storing
data in relational form, where tags (formatting commands) are mapped to data values.
- Can be used to model the data structure of an organization’s internal database.
Formats the document “book order”
Embeds the data values of “book order” from the database
XBRL
› XML-based language for standardizing methods for preparing, publishing, and exchanging financial information.
› First step is to select an XBRL taxonomy. - Classification schemes that specify the data to be included in an
exchange or report.
› Next step is to cross-reference each GL account to an appropriate XBRL taxonomy element (tag). - Mapping organization’s internal data to XBRL taxonomy elements.
- Tags are used whenever data is disseminated to outsiders.
› Computer programs that recognize and interpret tags general XBRL instance documents (financial reports) that can be published and made available to users.
Current State of XBRL Reporting
› Likely to be the primary vehicle for delivering business reports to investors and regulators in the near future.
› Developments in XBRL Reporting: - Required for US banking quarterly “Call Reports”.
- SEC ruling requires large publicly held companies to adopt SBRL by December 2015 to meet financial reporting requirements.
- Comparable developments to encourage or require SBRL in Tokyo, Canada, China, Spain, Australia the Netherlands and the UK.
› Use of XBRL facilitates fulfillment of legal requirements specified in SOX.
Controlling the GL/FRS
› Potential risks to the FRS include: - A defective audit trail.
- Unauthorized GL access.
- GL accounts that are out of balance with subsidiary accounts.
- Incorrect GL account balances due to unauthorized or incorrect journal vouchers.
› Six categories of physical controls under the COSO framework.
› Transaction authorization - Journal vouchers must be authorized by a manager at the source department.
Controlling the GL/FRS
› Segregation of duties – GL clerks should not: - have record-keeping responsibility for special journals or subsidiary
ledgers. - prepare journal vouchers or have custody of physical assets.
› Access controls - Unauthorized GL access can cause errors, fraud, and misrepresentations in financial statements. - SOX requires controls that limit database access.
› Accounting records – Audit trail ensures transactions can be accurately traced from initiation to final disposition. - Files should be detailed enough to: (1) answer inquiries, (2)
reconstruct data if destroyed, (3) provide historical data, (4) meet government requirements and (5) prevent, detect and correct errors.
Controlling the GL/FRS
› Independent verification - GL department provides this step within the accounting information system. - Journal voucher listing provides relevant details of each journal
voucher posted to the GL. - General ledger change report presents the effects of journal voucher
postings on GL accounts.
› IT application controls apply to the GL/FRS too. - Edits and check digits ensure error free data in the GL. - Process and output controls serve the same objectives. - Real-time transaction processing bypasses human reconciliation and
review which provides both benefits and risks. - Eliminating human element reduces the possibility of some error and increases
efficiency.
- Risk of applicable logic errors that could have widespread and devastating implications for the FRS.
Internal Control Implications of XBRL
› Taxonomy creation: Incorrect generation results in incorrect mapping between data and elements that could result in material misrepresentation of financial data.
› Taxonomy mapping errors: Correctly generated XBRL tags may be incorrectly assigned to internal database accounts, results in material misrepresentations of financial data.
› Validation of instance documents: Independent verification procedures need to be established to ensure that appropriate taxonomy and tags have been applied before posting to a web server.
Management Reporting Systems
› Usually seen as discretionary reporting, but can argue that Sarbanes-Oxley requires an effective MRS. - Critical element of organization’s internal control structure. - Directs attention to problems on a timely basis which promotes
effective management and supports business objectives.
› Formalization of tasks principle divides organizational areas into tasks with clearly defined limits of responsibility. - Purpose is to avoid an organizational structure that depends on
specific individuals.
- Organizational chart shows typical job positions in a firm.
- Allows formal specification of information needed to support tasks, regardless of the individual performing them.
Management Reporting Systems
› Responsibility and authority refer to an individual’s obligation to achieve desired results and the right to make decisions within the limits of that obligation. - Define the vertical reporting channels through which information flows.
› Span of control refers to the number of subordinates directly under the manager’s control. - Managers with narrow spans of control need detailed reports with
summarized information for managers with broad spans of control.
› Management by exception suggests managers should limit their attention to potential problem areas. - Reports should focus on changes in key factors that are symptomatic
of potential problems and avoid unnecessary details.
Management Function, Level, and Decision Type
› Short-term planning involves the implementation of specific plans that are needed to achieve long-range objectives (strategy).
› Control function ensures firm’s activities conform to the plan. › Strategic planning decisions include:
- Setting firm’s goals and determining scope of business activities. - Determining organizational structure and management philosophy.
› Strategic planning decision are long-term, require highly summarized information, tend to be nonrecurring, have a high degree of uncertainty and require both internal and external sources of information.
› Strategic decisions are broad in scope and have a profound impact on all levels of the organization.
Management Function, Level, and Decision Type
› Tactical planning decisions subordinate to strategic decisions. - Shorter term, more specific, recurring, have fairly certain outcomes,
and a lesser impact on the firm.
› Management control decisions involve motivating all managers to use resources as productively as possible. - Difficult to separate manager’s performance from that of the
operational unit.
› Operational control decisions deal with routine tasks. - Structured, narrow focus, dependent on details, short time frame.
- Three basic elements: (1)Attainable standards; (2) Performance evaluation with differences from standard noted as variances; and (3) Taking corrective action.
Problem Structure
› Reflects how well decision makers understand problems. › Three elements:
- Data: values used to represent relevant factors – use of ERDs. - Procedures: sequence of steps used in solving the problem – DFDs and
SFCs. - Objectives: results decision maker desires to attain – efficiency,
effectiveness, risk, control. › When all three elements are known with certainty, it is a structured
problem. - Not unique, well suited for traditional data processing techniques.
› Unstructured problems exist when any characteristic is not known with certainty. - Normally complex and unique making traditional data processing
techniques ineffective.
Systems and data mapping techniques (DFDs, SFCs and ERDs) are more useful at the operational level – although higher level decision makers will use aggregated data from operational systems
Management Reports
› May be in paper or digital form and express information verbally, numerically and/or graphically (see Appendix B Chapter 14 for some examples).
› Report objectives: To be useful, must have information content with two general objectives: - Reduce the level of uncertainty associated with a problem facing the
decision maker. - Influence the behavior of the decision maker in a positive way.
› Programmed reporting provides information to solve anticipated problems: - Scheduled reports are produced at specified intervals. - On-demand reports are triggered by events, not time.
Management Report Attributes
› Relevance – useful to decision making.
› Summarization – appropriate level of detail.
› Exception orientation – identify risks.
› Accuracy – free of material errors.
› Completeness – essential information.
› Timeliness – in time for decisions.
› Conciseness – presented with coding schemes and calculations as appropriate to be understandable.
General Model of AIS !!
Management Reports
› Managers cannot always anticipate information needs. › Database technology provides direct inquiry and report
generation capabilities that allow the generation of ad hoc reports without assistance.
› Data mining is the process of selecting, exploring and modeling data to uncover relationships and patterns. - The verification model uses a drill-down technique to either verify or
reject a user’s hypothesis. - The discovery model uses data mining to discover previously
unknown but important information hidden in the data.
› Successful data mining requires a data warehouse of archived operational data. (as outlined in Database Management)
Responsibility Accounting
› Every economic event that affects the organization is the responsibility of and can be traced to an individual manager.
› The budget process helps achieve objectives by establishing measureable financial goals for each organizational segment.
› Performance measurement and reporting take place at each operational segment. - Information flows upward as responsibility reports.
› Operations organized into responsibility centers: - A cost center has responsibility for cost management within budget. - A profit center has responsibility for cost control and revenues. - An investment center manager has general authority to make
decisions that affect the organization including product development and other investment decisions.
Behavioral Considerations
› Properly applied principles of authority, responsibility and task formalization promote goal congruence. - Carefully structured MRS plays important role in promoting goal
congruence while a badly designed MRS can cause actions in opposition to organizational objectives.
› Information overload occurs when managers receive more information than they can assimilate.
› Inappropriate performance measures can lead to behavior that is inconsistent with firm’s objectives. - Performance measures should consider all relevant aspects of
a manager’s responsibility – both financial and nonfinancial.
Which is better? Cost, profit or investment centre reporting? What sort of behavior and decision making would each type of reporting encourage?