Intro Reflection

profilevk4queen
Infromativerubricandfeedback.docx

Feedback for Informative Speech

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Proficient

Competent

Improvement Needed

Non-Existent/Needs Work

Outline

4 points

Outline is in excellent organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

3 points

Outline is in good organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

2 points

Outline is in somewhat organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

0 points

Outline is in not in organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA) or no outline submitted.

3 / 4

Introduction: Opening Statement

4 points

The Opening statement was powerful and captivated the audience

 

3 points

The Opening Statement was good and interested the audience

 

2 points

The Opening statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience

 

0 points

The Opening statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience

2 / 4

Introduction: Central Idea

4 points

The CI was an excellent summary of the speech

 

3 points

The CI was a good summary of the speech

 

2 points

The CI was an adequate summary of the speech

 

0 points

There was no clear Central Idea.

3 / 4

Introduction: Supporting Points

4 points

The SP’s were effectively stated and mapped out the speech

 

3 points

The SP’s were generally stated and mapped out the speech

 

2 points

The SP’s were somewhat stated and gave a generally mapped out the speech

 

0 points

The SP’s were not stated and there was no clear map of speech

0 / 4

Introduction: Established Personal Credibility

4 points

The Speaker effectively establish their credibility

 

3 points

The Speaker basically establish their credibility

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat establish their credibility

 

0 points

The Speaker did not establish their credibility

2 / 4

Introduction: Motivated the Audience

4 points

The Speaker effectively motivated the audience

 

3 points

The Speaker generally motivated the audience

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat or indirectly motivated the audience

 

0 points

The Speaker did not motivated the audience

2 / 4

Topic: Audience & Speaker

2 points

The topic was clearly appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

1 point

The topic was appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

0.5 points

The topic was somewhat appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

0 points

The topic was not appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

2 / 2

Topic: Time Limits

8 points

The Speaker achieved their time limits

 

6 points

The Speaker basically achieved their time limits (A little over or a little less)

 

2 points

The Speaker went over or under their time limits

 

0 points

The Speaker did not achieved their time limits

8 / 8

Purpose: Clarity

2 points

The purpose of the speech was very clear and specific to the audience

 

1 point

The purpose of the speech was clear to the audience

 

0.5 points

The purpose of the speech was somewhat clear to the audience

 

0 points

The purpose of the speech was not clear to the audience

2 / 2

Purpose: Achieved

4 points

The purpose of the speech was successfully achieved

 

3 points

The purpose of the speech was generally achieved

 

2 points

The purpose of the speech was somewhat achieved

 

0 points

The purpose of the speech was not achieved

3 / 4

Organization: Intro, Body, Conclusion

4 points

The speech had a clearly defined I-B-C

 

3 points

The speech had a generally defined I-B-C

 

2 points

The speech had a somewhat defined I-B-C

 

0 points

The speech did not have a defined I-B-C

3 / 4

Organization: Transitions and Signposts

4 points

The Speaker mastered the use of transitions

 

3 points

The Speaker had good use of transitions

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat used transitions

 

0 points

The Speaker did not use transitions

3 / 4

Organization: Main Points

4 points

Main points were exceptionally clear to the audience

 

3 points

Main points were generally clear to the audience

 

2 points

Main points were somewhat clear to the audience

 

0 points

Main points were not clear to the audience

3 / 4

Supporting Material: Credibility

4 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed all sources correctly

 

3 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed most sources correctly

 

2 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed some sources correctly

 

0 points

The Speaker did not state and/or display any sources correctly

0 / 4

Supporting Material: Information was Varied and Interesting

4 points

The information was very interesting to the audience

 

3 points

The information was interesting to the audience

 

2 points

The information was somewhat interesting to the audience

 

0 points

The information was not interesting to the audience

4 / 4

Visual Aids: Design

4 points

Excellent design - added significant support to speech

 

3 points

Decent design – added appropriate support

 

2 points

General design – added some support

 

0 points

VA’s did not support the speech

4 / 4

Visual Aids: Control

4 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout the entire speech

 

3 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout most of the speech

 

2 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout some of the speech

 

0 points

The Speaker did not maintained control of VA’s throughout speech

4 / 4

Delivery: Eye Contact

4 points

Speaker made consistent and sustained eye contact throughout speech

 

3 points

Speaker made eye contact throughout most of speech

 

2 points

Speaker made some eye contact throughout speech

 

0 points

Speaker made little or no eye contact throughout speech

4 / 4

Delivery: Voice & Tone

4 points

Voice was consistently sustained and leveled

 

3 points

Voice was generally sustained and leveled

 

2 points

Voice was monotone or sub-level, sometimes inaudible

 

0 points

Voice was inaudible

4 / 4

Delivery: Gestures & Posture

4 points

Gestures were controlled and effective

 

3 points

Gestures were generally controlled and effective

 

2 points

Gestures were somewhat controlled and/or distracted from message

 

0 points

Gestures were ineffective and distracted from message

4 / 4

Delivery: Flow

4 points

Speech had a consistent smooth pace

 

3 points

Speech had a generally smooth pace

 

2 points

Speech had a somewhat smooth pace; there were some awkward pauses

 

0 points

Speech did not have a smooth pace; there were many awkward pauses

3 / 4

Delivery: Energy

4 points

The Speaker maintained high energy throughout speech

 

3 points

The Speaker maintained decent energy throughout speech

 

2 points

The Speaker had some energy throughout speech

 

0 points

The Speaker had no energy throughout speech

4 / 4

Conclusion: Summarized Main Points

4 points

Main points of the speech were clearly and specifically restated

 

3 points

Main points of the speech were generally restated

 

2 points

Main points of the speech were somewhat restated; no direct reference to main points

 

0 points

Main points of the speech were not restated

0 / 4

Conclusion: Closing Statement

4 points

The Closing statement was powerful and captivated the audience

 

3 points

The Closing Statement was good and interested the audience

 

2 points

The Closing statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience

 

0 points

The Closing statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience

2 / 4

Audience Centered/Adapted to Listeners & Ethics: Sources, Viewpoints & Purpose

4 points

The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

&

The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

3 points

The Speaker mostly considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and mostly monitored and engaged the audience

 

&

The Speaker was generally conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

2 points

The Speaker occasionally considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and occasionally monitored and engaged the audience

&

The Speaker was somewhat conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

0 points

The Speaker somewhat and/or did not considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and did not monitored and engaged the audience

&

The Speaker was not conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

3 / 4

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

72 / 100

Bottom of Form

Submission Feedback

This is a nice start to the speech-making process

Outline is solid

Where is your Work Cited? It needs to be at the bottom of your outline

Make Opening Statement Powerful-grab your audience attention

State Supporting points in Introduction-list main points to discuss in body of speech – Do Not Explain. Number them in introduction

Establish Credibility in introduction-Why should the audience listen to you (You did your research and could have a personal connection)

Directly motivate the audience in introduction-why should they listen to your topic-make it personal to the audience in front of you!

Cite all sources verbally in speech.  You need to physically state: Name, year, where you got the information from (like an article).

You do not have the required amount of sources for this speech

Overall, your delivery is strong

Restate Central Idea and Main points in conclusion

Give a powerful closing statement