Intro Reflection
Feedback for Informative Speech
Top of Form
|
|
|
|
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
Proficient
Competent
Improvement Needed
Non-Existent/Needs Work
Outline
4 points
Outline is in excellent organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
3 points
Outline is in good organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
2 points
Outline is in somewhat organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
0 points
Outline is in not in organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA) or no outline submitted.
3 / 4
Introduction: Opening Statement
4 points
|
The Opening statement was powerful and captivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Opening Statement was good and interested the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Opening statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Opening statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience |
|
|
2 / 4
Introduction: Central Idea
4 points
|
The CI was an excellent summary of the speech |
|
3 points
|
The CI was a good summary of the speech |
|
2 points
|
The CI was an adequate summary of the speech |
|
0 points
|
There was no clear Central Idea. |
|
|
3 / 4
Introduction: Supporting Points
4 points
|
The SP’s were effectively stated and mapped out the speech |
|
3 points
|
The SP’s were generally stated and mapped out the speech |
|
2 points
|
The SP’s were somewhat stated and gave a generally mapped out the speech |
|
0 points
|
The SP’s were not stated and there was no clear map of speech |
|
|
0 / 4
Introduction: Established Personal Credibility
4 points
|
The Speaker effectively establish their credibility |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker basically establish their credibility |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat establish their credibility |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not establish their credibility |
|
|
2 / 4
Introduction: Motivated the Audience
4 points
|
The Speaker effectively motivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker generally motivated the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat or indirectly motivated the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not motivated the audience |
|
|
2 / 4
Topic: Audience & Speaker
2 points
|
The topic was clearly appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
1 point
|
The topic was appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
0.5 points
|
The topic was somewhat appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
0 points
|
The topic was not appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
|
2 / 2
Topic: Time Limits
8 points
|
The Speaker achieved their time limits |
|
6 points
|
The Speaker basically achieved their time limits (A little over or a little less) |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker went over or under their time limits |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not achieved their time limits |
|
|
8 / 8
Purpose: Clarity
2 points
|
The purpose of the speech was very clear and specific to the audience |
|
1 point
|
The purpose of the speech was clear to the audience |
|
0.5 points
|
The purpose of the speech was somewhat clear to the audience |
|
0 points
|
The purpose of the speech was not clear to the audience |
|
|
2 / 2
Purpose: Achieved
4 points
|
The purpose of the speech was successfully achieved |
|
3 points
|
The purpose of the speech was generally achieved |
|
2 points
|
The purpose of the speech was somewhat achieved |
|
0 points
|
The purpose of the speech was not achieved |
|
|
3 / 4
Organization: Intro, Body, Conclusion
4 points
|
The speech had a clearly defined I-B-C |
|
3 points
|
The speech had a generally defined I-B-C |
|
2 points
|
The speech had a somewhat defined I-B-C |
|
0 points
|
The speech did not have a defined I-B-C |
|
|
3 / 4
Organization: Transitions and Signposts
4 points
|
The Speaker mastered the use of transitions |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker had good use of transitions |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat used transitions |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not use transitions |
|
|
3 / 4
Organization: Main Points
4 points
|
Main points were exceptionally clear to the audience |
|
3 points
|
Main points were generally clear to the audience |
|
2 points
|
Main points were somewhat clear to the audience |
|
0 points
|
Main points were not clear to the audience |
|
|
3 / 4
Supporting Material: Credibility
4 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed all sources correctly |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed most sources correctly |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed some sources correctly |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not state and/or display any sources correctly |
|
|
0 / 4
Supporting Material: Information was Varied and Interesting
4 points
|
The information was very interesting to the audience |
|
3 points
|
The information was interesting to the audience |
|
2 points
|
The information was somewhat interesting to the audience |
|
0 points
|
The information was not interesting to the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Visual Aids: Design
4 points
|
Excellent design - added significant support to speech |
|
3 points
|
Decent design – added appropriate support |
|
2 points
|
General design – added some support |
|
0 points
|
VA’s did not support the speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Visual Aids: Control
4 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout the entire speech |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout most of the speech |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout some of the speech |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not maintained control of VA’s throughout speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Eye Contact
4 points
|
Speaker made consistent and sustained eye contact throughout speech |
|
3 points
|
Speaker made eye contact throughout most of speech |
|
2 points
|
Speaker made some eye contact throughout speech |
|
0 points
|
Speaker made little or no eye contact throughout speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Voice & Tone
4 points
|
Voice was consistently sustained and leveled |
|
3 points
|
Voice was generally sustained and leveled |
|
2 points
|
Voice was monotone or sub-level, sometimes inaudible |
|
0 points
|
Voice was inaudible |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Gestures & Posture
4 points
|
Gestures were controlled and effective |
|
3 points
|
Gestures were generally controlled and effective |
|
2 points
|
Gestures were somewhat controlled and/or distracted from message |
|
0 points
|
Gestures were ineffective and distracted from message |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Flow
4 points
|
Speech had a consistent smooth pace |
|
3 points
|
Speech had a generally smooth pace |
|
2 points
|
Speech had a somewhat smooth pace; there were some awkward pauses |
|
0 points
|
Speech did not have a smooth pace; there were many awkward pauses |
|
|
3 / 4
Delivery: Energy
4 points
|
The Speaker maintained high energy throughout speech |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker maintained decent energy throughout speech |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker had some energy throughout speech |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker had no energy throughout speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Conclusion: Summarized Main Points
4 points
|
Main points of the speech were clearly and specifically restated |
|
3 points
|
Main points of the speech were generally restated |
|
2 points
|
Main points of the speech were somewhat restated; no direct reference to main points |
|
0 points
|
Main points of the speech were not restated |
|
|
0 / 4
Conclusion: Closing Statement
4 points
|
The Closing statement was powerful and captivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Closing Statement was good and interested the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Closing statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Closing statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience |
|
|
2 / 4
Audience Centered/Adapted to Listeners & Ethics: Sources, Viewpoints & Purpose
4 points
|
The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience & The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
3 points
& The Speaker was generally conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker occasionally considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and occasionally monitored and engaged the audience & The Speaker was somewhat conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
0 points
The Speaker somewhat and/or did not considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and did not monitored and engaged the audience
&
The Speaker was not conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience
3 / 4
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
72 / 100
Bottom of Form
|
Submission Feedback |
|
|
This is a nice start to the speech-making process Outline is solid Where is your Work Cited? It needs to be at the bottom of your outline Make Opening Statement Powerful-grab your audience attention State Supporting points in Introduction-list main points to discuss in body of speech – Do Not Explain. Number them in introduction Establish Credibility in introduction-Why should the audience listen to you (You did your research and could have a personal connection) Directly motivate the audience in introduction-why should they listen to your topic-make it personal to the audience in front of you! Cite all sources verbally in speech. You need to physically state: Name, year, where you got the information from (like an article). You do not have the required amount of sources for this speech Overall, your delivery is strong Restate Central Idea and Main points in conclusion Give a powerful closing statement |