Communications Class (READ THE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE)
COMS 101
Informative Speech Outline Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
|
Good/Excellent |
Fair/Competent |
Deficient |
Points Earned |
|
DEVELOPMENT: Planning Items |
5 Points Planning items (audience description, organizational pattern, etc.) are present and clear. |
3 Points Planning items (audience description, organizational pattern, etc.) are present but need clarity. |
1 Point Planning items (audience description, organizational pattern, etc.) are absent. |
|
|
DEVELOPMENT: Purpose Statement |
5 Points Purpose statement is clear but needs more development. |
3 Points Purpose statement is clear but needs more development. |
1 Point Purpose statement is absent or unclear. |
|
|
DEVELOPMENT: Introduction and Conclusion |
7 Points Introduction and conclusion sections include all required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.). |
5 Points Introduction and conclusion sections include most but not all required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.). |
2 Points Introduction and conclusion sections lack most or all required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.). |
|
|
DEVELOPMENT: Main Point Statement |
5 Points Main point statements are clear and relevant to thesis. |
3 Points Main point statements are clear but partly relevant to thesis. |
1 Point Main point statements are absent, unclear, or irrelevant to thesis. |
|
|
DEVELOPMENT: Main Point Development |
8 Points Main points are strongly developed via supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
5 Points Main points are moderately backed by supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
2 Points Main points are minimally developed via supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
|
|
ORGANIZATION: Introduction Sequencing |
5 Points Introduction section properly sequences all of its required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
3 Points Introduction section properly sequences some of its required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
1 Point Introduction section improperly sequences its required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
|
|
ORGANIZATION: Conclusion Sequencing |
5 Points Conclusion section properly sequences all of its required sub-sections (summary, etc.). |
3 Points Conclusion section properly sequences some of its required sub-sections (summary, etc.). |
1 Point Conclusion section improperly sequences its required sub-sections (summary, etc.). |
|
|
ORGANIZATION: Organizational Pattern |
7 Points Body section clearly follows an appropriate organizational pattern. |
5 Points Body section partly follows an appropriate organizational pattern. |
2 Points Body section does not follow an appropriate organizational pattern. |
|
|
ORGANIZATION: Transitions |
3 Points Transitional wording links all sections and sub-sections. |
2 Points Some transitional wording links sections and/or subsections. |
0 Points No transitional wording links sections and/or sub-sections. |
|
|
ORGANIZATION: Unity |
7 Points The presentation as a whole is strongly unified and coherent. |
5 Points The presentation as a whole is moderately unified and cohesive. |
2 Points The presentation as a whole lacks unity and cohesiveness. |
|
|
GRAMMAR: Mechanics |
3 Points The writing satisfies grammatical, punctuation-related, and spelling-related standards. |
2 Points The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation-related, and/or spelling-related errors. |
0 Points The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation-related, and/or spelling-related errors. |
|
|
GRAMMAR: Language Use |
3 Points Language use is accurate, appropriate, and effective. |
2 Points Language use is partly unclear, awkward, or inappropriate. |
0 Points Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate. |
|
|
GRAMMAR: Tone |
3 Points The writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective. |
2 Points The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective. |
0 Points The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate. |
|
|
STYLE: General Style Formatting |
3 Points The writing correctly follows style/formatting guidelines. |
2 Points The writing partly follows style/formatting guidelines. |
0 Points The writing lacks many elements of correct style/formatting. |
|
|
STYLE: In-Text References |
3 Points In-text parenthetical citations are consistently correct and appropriate. |
2 Points In-text source citations are moderately correct and appropriate. |
0 Points In-text source citations are minimally correct and appropriate. |
|
|
STYLE: References Page |
3 Points End reference page is correctly and appropriately formatted. |
2 Points End reference page contains some formatting problems. |
0 Points End reference page is absent or badly formatted. |
|
|
Total |
/75 |
|||
|
Instructor’s Comments:
|
Page 1 of 2