Informative Speech outline-instructions and sample attached
COMS 101
Informative Speech Outline Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
|
Advanced (90-100%) |
Proficient (70-89%) |
Developing (1-69%) |
Not Present |
|
DEVELOPMENT: Planning Items and Purpose Statements |
5 to 5 points All planning items (organizational pattern name, audience description, topic statement), the general statement, and the specific purpose statement are present and are perfectly developed. |
4 to 4 points Planning items (organizational pattern name, audience description, topic statement), the general statement, and the specific purpose statement are mostly present but are moderately developed. |
1 to 3 points Some planning items (organizational pattern name, audience description, topic statement), the general statement, and the specific purpose statement are present but are minimally developed. |
0 points |
|
DEVELOPMENT: Introduction and Conclusion |
7 to 7 points Introduction and conclusion sections include all required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.--see the template), and each is perfectly developed. |
5 to 6 points Introduction and conclusion sections include most if not all required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.--see the template), but these are moderately developed. |
1 to 4 points Introduction and conclusion sections include some required sub-sections (attention-getter, purpose statement, etc.—see the template), but these are minimally developed. |
0 points |
|
DEVELOPMENT: Main Point Statement |
5 to 5 points Main point statements are stated in single, declarative sentence format and in wording that clearly relates them to each other and to the introduction's thesis statement. |
4 to 4 points Main point statements are clear but partly relevant to thesis. |
1 to 3 points Main point statements are unclear, or irrelevant to thesis. |
0 points |
|
DEVELOPMENT: Main Point Development |
11 to 12 points Main points and their sub-points are strongly developed via supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
8 to 10 points Main points and their sub-points are moderately backed by supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
1 to 7 points Main points and their sub-points (if any) are minimally developed via supportive examples, illustrations, statistics, expert quotations, explanations, or narrative details. |
0 points |
|
ORGANIZATION: Introduction and Conclusion Sequencing |
5 to 5 points Introduction and conclusion sections include and properly sequence all of their required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
4 to 4 points Introduction and conclusion sections improperly sequence most of their required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
1 to 3 points Introduction and conclusion sections include and properly sequence some but not most of their required sub-sections (attention-getter, etc.). |
0 points |
|
ORGANIZATION: Organizational Pattern |
8 to 8 points Body section clearly follows an appropriate organizational pattern. |
6 to 7 points Body section partly follows an appropriate organizational pattern. |
1 to 5 points Body section does not follow an appropriate organizational pattern. |
0 points |
|
ORGANIZATION: Transitions |
4 to 4 points Transitional wording links all sections and sub-sections. |
3 to 3 points Some transitional wording links sections and/or subsections. |
1 to 2 points No transitional wording links sections and/or sub-sections. |
0 points |
|
ORGANIZATION: Unity |
5 to 5 points The presentation as a whole is strongly unified and coherent. |
4 to 4 points The presentation as a whole is moderately unified and cohesive. |
1 to 3 points The presentation as a whole is minimally unified and cohesive. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/GRAMMAR: Mechanics |
4 to 4 points The writing satisfies grammatical, punctuation-related, and spelling-related standards. |
3 to 3 points The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation-related, and/or spelling-related errors. |
1 to 2 points The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation-related, and/or spelling-related errors. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/GRAMMAR: Language Use |
4 to 4 points Language use is accurate, appropriate, and effective. |
3 to 3 points Language use is partly unclear, awkward or inappropriate. |
1 to 2 points Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/GRAMMAR: Tone |
4 to 4 points The writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective. |
3 to 3 points The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective. |
1 to 2 points The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/FORMAT: General Style Formatting |
4 to 4 points The writing correctly follows style/formatting guidelines. |
3 to 3 points The writing partly follows style/formatting guidelines. |
1 to 2 points The writing lacks many elements of correct style/formatting. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/FORMAT: In-Text References |
4 to 4 points In-text parenthetical citations are consistently correct and appropriate. |
3 to 3 points In-text source citations are moderately correct and appropriate. |
1 to 2 points In-text source citations are minimally correct and appropriate. |
0 points |
|
STYLE/FORMAT: Reference List Page |
4 to 4 points End reference page is correctly and appropriately formatted. |
3 to 3 points End reference page contains some formatting problems. |
1 to 2 points End reference page is present but badly formatted. |
0 points |
|
Total |
/75 |
|||
|
Instructor’s Comments:
|
Page 1 of 2