Info in global economy

profileE_RK
info-ppt.pptx

Chapter1- intro to policy making in the digital Age

Chapter2-Educating Public managers and policy analysts in the era of informatics

Chapter3-The Quality of social simulation: An example from research policy modeling

Chapter Goals and Objectives

Overall – students will learn and understand why:

▪ the explosive growth in data, computational power, and social media create new opportunities for innovating governance and policy-making ▪ global information and communications technology (ICT) developments affect policy-making cycle and result in drastic changes in the policy development

▪ organizations need the digital developments, new approaches, concepts, instruments, and methods as they operate in the complex and uncertain societies

▪ e-government policy, e-policy, policy informatics, and data science are different

1. Intro to Policy-Making in the Digital Age

❖ Identification of complexity and uncertainty in policy-making

▪ policy-making is driven by the need to solve societal problems

❖ Developments

▪ developments that influence the traditional way of policy-making

❖ Availability of Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD)

▪ Learn and understand the needs for multiple perspectives to stimulate new practices

❖ Rise of hybrid simulation approaches

▪ allows decision-makers to understand the essence of a policy…

❖ Ubiquitous user engagement

▪ considerable complexities encountered in the design of public policy

❖ Combining disciplines in e-government policy-making

▪ practice driven, employs modeling techniques, needs knowledge from various fields, and maintains focus on governance and policy-making

2. Why educate public managers and policy analysts in the era of informatics

❖ Types of practitioner orientations to policy informatics

▪ two “ideal types” of policy informatics practitioner, require greater and greater levels of technical mastery of analytics techniques and approaches

❖ Policy informatics-savvy public managers

▪ need to know what kinds of questions that policy informatics projects or programs can answer or not answer

▪ need to know how to contract with and/or manage data managers, policy analysts, and modelers

❖ Second type of practitioners – policy informatics analysts

▪ need for policy analysts – move beyond basic surveys of research methods

❖ Applications to professional masters programs

▪ PA 301: Foundations of Public Administration

▪ PA 306: Policy Systems ▪ PA 308: Decision-Making Models ▪ PA 317: Systems Analysis and Strategic Management

3. The quality of social simulation: An example from research policy modeling

❖ Communicative skills, patience, willingness to compromise

▪ policy-making is driven by the need to solve societal problems

❖ Quality in social simulation

▪ develop models from a simulation as “an illusory appearance that manages a reality effect” (cf. Norris 1992)

❖ Assessing quality: the example – the SKIN approach

▪ policy modeling of SKIN – birth of the SKIN inspired by the idea of bringing theory on innovation networks stemming from innovation economics and economic sociology, onto the computer— a computer theory instantiated, calibrated, tested, and validated by empirical data

❖ INFO-SKIN – the constructivist view

▪ ability to use scenario-based modeling as a worksite for “reality constructions

❖ INFO-SKIN – the user community view

▪ stakeholders must learn about the scope and applicability of the methods; researchers get acquainted with the problems policy makers have to solve