computer science

profilePapah
INF11114Report_2_21-223.docx

COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT 2021/22 – REPORT 2

1. Module number

INF11114

2. Module title

Digital Business Environments

3. Module leader (first point of contact for students)

Dr Colin Smith ([email protected])

4. Module tutors

Dr Colin Smith

5. Assessment

Report 2.

Learning Outcomes 1-5 in the Module Descriptor are assessed.

6. Weighting

70% of module assessment

7. Size and/or time limits for assessment

3000 words (plus/minus 10%)

8. Deadline of submission.

Your attention is drawn to the penalties for late submission

3pm on Monday 2nd May 2022

9. Arrangements for submission

Submit online using the link on the Moodle site for the module. No paper submissions are required and submission by email will not be accepted.

You must also keep your own copy of the submission.

10. Assessment Regulations

All assessments are subject to the University Regulations.

11. The requirements for the assessment

Follow normal academic conventions for acknowledging sources.

Assessment details are described below.

12. Special instructions

None

13. Return of work

Feedback will be provided within three weeks of submission

14. Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria are described below

1. Requirements

This is a formal piece of work, worth 70% of your mark for the module.

Report 2 assesses the following module learning outcomes:

LO1: Evaluate the concepts and applications underpinning the exploitation of digital technologies by businesses and other organisations

LO2: Assess the organisational, managerial and competitive implications of digital technologies

LO3: Critically assess operating models that businesses deploy for the online environment

LO4: Synthesize solutions to the problems of customer engagement across different channels and ‘touchpoints’, online and offline.

LO5: Present the output of independent and directed study in the form of reports

You must produce a report on the ways in which a specific organisation is exploiting the digital environment. The organisation can operate within the private, public or third sectors. The report wordcount should be 3000 words (plus or minus 10%). See further requirements below.

In Report 1 you undertook preparatory work for a study examining how one organisation is operating within the digital environment. In Report 2 you will move beyond preparation and undertake the actual analysis. You may have decided to change your focus and approach as a result of undertaking Report 1 – no justification of any change is required within Report 2. That said, if you are changing focus, you may wish to repeat the main tasks of Report 1 for your ‘second choice’ organisation to ensure you are adequately prepared. In this instance, you are encouraged to contact the module leader to discuss further.

The preparatory work undertaken for Report 1 should have helped define your subject, locate relevant secondary (and potentially primary) data and consider your analytical approach.

2. Report Content Areas

The following elements must all be included in your report. Please use the exact headings underlined below, and take note of the explanatory text under each heading indicating what is required:

Abstract

The abstract summarises the entire content of the report.

Introduction

To set the focus and scope of the work.

Identification and analysis of contextual factors affecting the organisation’s exploitation of the digital environment

The contextual factors will vary depending on whether the organisation operates in the public, private or third sectors, is ‘pureplay’ digital or ‘bricks and clicks’, and has physical or virtual products and services.

However, the section could potentially address:

· Analysis of micro and macro environments including assessment of competitive opportunities and threats balanced against capabilities

· The consumer channel structures and the supply chains (digital and/or physical) in operation in the sector (external view, looking at the sector as a whole rather than your business)

· Analysis of customer segments and online behaviours (again, taking an external view)

Analysis of the current contribution of digital capabilities to the organisation

In this section you should draw on the tools and frameworks covered in the lectures and tutorials to analyse how the organisation is exploiting digital capabilities to succeed in the digital environment. Again, the content covered should be appropriate to the organisation and sector, but could potentially address:

· The business model (using the business model canvas)

· Digital Marketplace Map (using a Persona and showing the importance of digital intermediaries online) or else a Customer Journey Map (also based on a Persona but showing offline as well as online experiences and interactions)

· Value configurations in operation, and the place of ‘digital’ in supporting value-adding processes

· Development of the business’ consumer channel structures and wider supply chains

· Analysis of how the business is exploiting the ‘search’, ‘social’ and ‘mobile’ ecosystems (drawing on relevant analytics data). (n.b. data discussed here can also be drawn upon for Digital Marketplace Map or Customer Journey Map)

· Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the current customer-facing website or App, compared to that of one direct competitor

Conclusions, recommendations, and critical assessment of the work that has been undertaken

Clear conclusions derived from your analysis linking to specific and actionable recommendations. Critical assessment which highlights the strengths of the approach that you have taken, together with the scope for further work.

3. Format

The report should contain a Title Page showing the word count and your matriculation number (do not include your name). It should also include a 300-word Abstract. The maximum word length of the main text of this assignment is 3,000 words (plus or minus 10%). This word count excludes title page, abstract, all tables and figures, reference list, appendices – please enter this total on the title page. Reports with a word count over 3,300 will gain a maximum grade of P1 (the lowest pass grade possible). A report of much less than 2700 words is unlikely to contain adequate content, which will reduce the marks available.

This is an academic report, and as such must make explicit reference to the concepts, tools and theories covered in the module. Therefore, appropriate literature should be cited. However, it is also important that you critically assess the operations of the organisation, and present some clear recommendations as to its future direction.

Following the Title Page containing the word-count, matriculation number and Abstract, the report must contain the following mandatory sections:

1. Introduction

2. Identification and analysis of contextual factors affecting the organisation’s exploitation of the digital environment

3. Analysis of the current contribution of digital capabilities to the organisation

4. Conclusions, recommendations, and critical assessment of the work that has been undertaken

Use the marking criteria (overleaf) to plan the report – this shows the relative weighting of each section.

All sources consulted must be formally acknowledged through good referencing practice, adhering to the School of Computing Guidelines linked from here: https://my.napier.ac.uk/your-studies/improve-your-academic-and-study-skills/referencing-and-academic-integrity/referencing-guidelines

Page layout: Submissions should be in Arial font, 12 pt, 1.5 line spaced.

Figures and tables, appendices: Captions for tables and figures should use the same font as the main text. They should be referred to in the text using Arabic numerals, e.g. Figure 1, Figure 2, Table 1, Table 2, etc., in order of appearance.

Before you submit the report, it should be spell-checked and proof read. The final version must be submitted using the Report 2 submission link on Moodle. Late submissions that have not been approved by your Programme Leader will be capped at P1.

Marks and feedback will be provided within three working weeks from submission.

Digital Business Environments

Digital Business Environments

1 of 4

INF11114 Report 2

4 of 4

INF11114 Report 2

4. Marking Criteria

Feedback on the Report will be provided electronically via Moodle, using Turnitin’s Grademark system.

Each element of the marking grid will be graded using the University’s 16-point grading scale (ie F6-F1, P1-P5, D1-D5). Please refer to the rubric below to understand the weightings of the criteria and their expectations.

Criterion

Weighting

Fail, F6 to F1

Pass, P1 – P5

Distinction, D1 – D5

Abstract and Introduction

10

Abstract missing, poorly constructed or incomplete.

Limited Introduction that lacks clarity in setting the remit for the report.

Abstract provided but could provide fuller or more consistent coverage of main elements of the work.

Introduction adequately covers the report requirements but could be further developed into a clear outline of the remit of the work.

Abstract is specific and appropriately detailed, with even coverage of all report elements

Effective Introduction, very clear remit for the work.

Identification and analysis of contextual factors affecting the organisation’s exploitation of the digital environment

30

Poor assessment of contextual factors. Limited or partial application of analytical tools, with outcomes that are vague or lacking in clarity.

Analysis of contextual factors is competent but would benefit from further detail. Development of a consistent analysis across each of the tools/approaches used is lacking.

Very strong analysis of contextual factors through an appropriate selection and application of tools/approaches. Consistent and convincing argument is developed across the section as a whole.

Analysis of the current contribution of digital capabilities to the organisation

40

Poor assessment of current capabilities. Limited or partial application of analytical tools, with outcomes that are vague or lacking in clarity.

Analysis of current capabilities is competent but would benefit from further detail. Development of a consistent analysis across each of the tools/approaches used is lacking.

Very strong analysis of current digital capabilities through an appropriate selection and application of tools/approaches. Consistent and convincing argument is developed across the section as a whole.

Conclusions, recommendations, and critical assessment

20

Limited conclusion with no clear definition of outcomes. Recommendations missing or poorly substantiated.

Appropriate conclusion but could be further developed both in terms of the detail of outcomes, and the relation of these to the analysis in the main body. Recommendations credible, but could be more thoroughly grounded in the work done

Assured and informative conclusion that consolidates key points arising from the work. Focused and actionable recommendations thoroughly derived from the outcomes of the analysis.