Macro economics questions

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 1/7

© James Ferguson

Martin Wolf SEPTEMBER 21 2021

Why are central banks finding their job so hard to do? A common view is that this

is because they are imbeciles. People who assert this insist that central banks need

to keep interest rates in line with their historic norms. This is wrong, because historic norms are irrelevant. The questions are why and what this implies for our

economies.

A paper by Atif Mian, Ludwig Straub and Amir Sufi at the Jackson Hole monetary

conference on 27 August illuminates this issue. It reaches a conclusion, already

suggested in their earlier work: the principal explanation for the decline in real interest rates has been high and rising inequality and not demographic factors,

such as the savings behaviour of the “baby-boom” generation over their lifetimes, as some have argued.

The analysis starts with estimates of the real “natural rate” of interest, a concept that goes back to the Swedish economist Knut Wicksell. The natural rate, he

explained, balances demand and supply in the economy, which shows itself in

stable prices. The modern doctrine of inflation targeting has descended from this idea. Crucially, however, estimates of this rate for the US show a fall from about 4

per cent four decades ago to around zero now.

Opinion Central banks

Inequality is behind central bank dilemma

MARTIN WOLF

Stagflation would create devastating problems for weaker borrowers, notably heavily

indebted emerging economies.

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 2/7

This decline is matched in other high-income countries, as one would expect: in an

open world economy, equilibrium real interest rates should converge. As the paper

also notes, the decline “raises concerns about secular stagnation, threatens asset price bubbles, and complicates monetary policy”. Indeed, it is a big part of the

reason why central banks have had to make huge asset purchases in crisis situations, such as now.

Their main point is that savings rates vary far more by income within age cohorts

than they do across age cohorts. The differences are also huge: in the US, the top 10 per cent of households by income have a savings rate between 10 and 20

percentage points higher than the bottom 90 per cent. Given this divergence, the

shift in the distribution of income towards the top inevitably raised the overall propensity to save. As an explanation of rising propensities to save and the falling

real interest rate, the shift of the baby-boom generation into middle age does not work, because rising savings have been continuous while the impact of the

demographic shift on savings behaviour has not.

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 3/7

At the aggregate level, savings must match investment. So what happens when the

rich get richer and so try to save more? Interest rates must fall. It turns out that the impact of this on business investment is quite feeble. Indeed, the propensity to

invest has been chronically weak, partly for demographic reasons. So the offsets

have had to come either from persistent fiscal deficits or from higher spending by the bottom 90 per cent. Both are fuelled by debt, while the latter is also powered by

asset price bubbles, especially in house prices. As central banks pursue the natural rate downwards, they drive both of these processes. But, as debt ratios rise, natural

rates fall still further, as the highly indebted become ever less creditworthy.

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 4/7

An objection to this argument is that it is just about one country, however

important. But the tendency towards more income inequality is shared by almost all large economies, including notably China. Indeed, the excess savings of the rest

of the world have also shown up in persistent US current account deficits. The need

to offset the latter has made the task of the Federal Reserve yet more difficult.

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 5/7

The financial crisis of 2007-12 should be seen as an outcome of these processes,

resolved at the time by rescuing the financial system, tightening regulation and doubling down on low rates across the yield curve. The Covid crisis was a bolt from

the blue but the response was more of the same, but on an even bigger scale. This

time, moreover, the huge increases in central bank reserves actually increased broader monetary aggregates. It is no great surprise, therefore, that the

combination of supply side disruptions with today’s strong demand are generating “surprise” inflation.

So how might the story evolve? There is no powerful reason to expect income inequality, the fundamental driver of today’s excess savings, to reverse, although it

might stabilise. There is an excellent reason for a huge investment boom, notably

the climate transition. But that will not occur without consistent, determined, intelligent and globally aware policymaking, none of which we can expect, though

we may hope. So, in the medium to long term, secular stagnation is likely to return, unless income inequality falls

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 6/7

unless income inequality falls.

The short term is harder to read, but if it goes wrong, is disturbing, perhaps even

for the medium term. In his speech at Jackson Hole, Jay Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, insisted that all is under control. But he would say that. The surge

in inflation has in fact surprised almost everybody. The worry must be that the

price shocks persist and then get baked into expectations, which will then only be reversed by a period of significantly higher short-term rates. That would cause

stagflation, which would create painful dilemmas for central banks and surely cause devastating problems for weaker borrowers, notably but not exclusively

heavily indebted emerging economies.

The exceptional policies of 2020 can no longer be justified. Given today’s super-

low short-term interest rates and supportive fiscal policies, it is hard to see why

large asset purchases should continue, either. We have more than enough money today and bond yields ought to rise a little. When the facts change, central banks

should change their minds. That time is now.

29/11/2021, 00:35 Inequality is behind central bank dilemma | Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/1b65d2c0-251c-467d-b924-42f0c78c3d34 7/7

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2021. All rights reserved.

[email protected]

Follow Martin Wolf with myFT and on Twitter

Letters in response to this article:

Economists have failed to anticipate pandemic risks / From Professor Tim

Congdon, Chairman, Institute of International Monetary Research, University of Buckingham, UK

Declining investment may explain why rates are low / From Marek Dabrowski,

Non-Resident Scholar, Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium