User interface prototype wireframe part 2

HIT381 Human Computer Interaction Design – Deliverable 4: User Test Results (Part B)

Introduction

The goal of the usability test was to find out if Fill in the details

WHO was tested – how did these relate to app target audience

The test was performed where. A copy of the original documents used for the test in appendix N

About the participants

This can be tabular or paragraph – use tables as much as possible with some text explanation

Process

Outline the process used

Video: Post link here Resources

Results

1. Quantitative results

The user was asked to perform x tasks related to the goals of the user study. The success rate and time to complete each task is summarised below (Table 1)

Table1: An overview of task success and time.

Score
Tasks	0%	50%	100%	Estimated Task time	Actual time spent
	did not manage to complete task	completed task with difficulty	completed task successfully
	did not manage to complete task	completed task with difficulty	completed task successfully
	did not manage to complete task	completed task with difficulty	completed task successfully
	did not manage to complete task	completed task with difficulty	completed task successfully
	did not manage to complete task	completed task with difficulty	completed task successfully

2. Qualitative results

Present your qualitative results here

Discussion

From the quantitative data listed above and qualitative data collected after the user testing a range of problems were identified. The user managed to complete

Two problems were however identified during user testing associated with ….

Problem #	Issue/s	Possible Solutions
Problem 1:
Problem 2:

From the qualitative data gathered from the post test questions and general comments gathered during the testing process strengths and weaknesses of the app interface were noted. Strengths were:

· Make a list of what worked

· Here

Further issues included

Problem #	Issues	Possible Solutions
Problem x:		·
Problem 4:		·

Note: Some of the results obtained with observation and comments were not added to this list as being irrelevant. These results contain the following:

· The user didn’t understand why the list description was saying (some apples) and (all oranges). This is due to the fact that the user didn’t actually read the content of the message box provided by the wizard.

· The user could not fond the information about how to delete an element of the price compare list. Also this result is based on the fact that the user was confused with the naming of the wizard (help button) at the start. This problem has already been identified.

Conclusion

Appendix’ N’- Original documents used during User Testing

Consent form	Initial questionnaire
Name of document	Name of document

CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY | 2016 SEMESTER 1 Page 1 of 1