Catherine Owens
Week 8 Overview.pdf
Week 8- Completing the IEP Assignment
Week 8 Overview
Instructions
Now is the time to start putting together all that you have learned and practiced
from the preceding LMs ... the completed IEP. Please make sure that you read all
the accompanying information in this LM ... and write according to instructions ...
not how you do it in your district (if different).
• Read Final IEP Assignment Instructions
• Read the Writing the IEP Guide and the IEP Final Assignment Rubric to help
you with this assignment.
What is due this LM:
• Submit IEP Final Project assignment as a Word document to assignment
file on or before Sunday, June 29th
Final IEP Assignment Instructions.pdf
Final IEP Assignment
Download the IEP form and the case study provided for writing an IEP.
All sections of the IEP form must be completed.
The rubric is posted for your reference and there is a file on IEP Development
that is a quick reference to the material that is covered in the LMs.
Save the IEP as a word document and submit as an attachment to this assignment
dropbox. Title it yourlastnameFinalIEPAssignment
For this IEP you are required to complete all sections of the IEP form and
specifically write:
* two measurable annual goals (AGs) (one academic and one for inappropriate social
behavior) (make sure you include "baseline" measures from your PLAAFP)
* a minimum of three instructional short-term objectives/benchmarks for each AG
One AG must use instructional short-term objectives and the other AG benchmarks
* a minimum of two accommodations/supports for each of the five student
supports areas.. indicating the type and specific function of each (remember these
should use student "strengths" to accommodate student "needs" in achieving
involvement in and making progress in the general education curriculum (make sure
that supporting statements were included in your PLAAFP)
***ALSO, toward the end of the semester, you will be asked to submit your Final
IEP Project to your Anthology Professional Portfolio. Further instructions will be
provided at that time.
Writing the IEP Guide.pdf
1
Writing the IEP
Introduction
Writing the individualized education program (IEP)
Use this guide to write an IEP to help you complete the Georgia IEP suggested form for the final project.
The Georgia IEP form contains all the components required by IDEA
2004 and some additional components required by the Georgia Department of Education
(GaDOE). It is a word document and generally user friendly.
Writing an individualized student IEP is a very personal process, in which you are telling a story about
part of a child’s life. Each student’s strengths and weaknesses are assessed and considered by a team
of professionals, the parents, and at certain times the student himself. It is a
very important process with team members collaborating on a plan to support the unique needs of the
child.
In writing the IEP, the team must look at the student’s “strengths”, not just at his “needs/weaknesses”,
and design an appropriate program that
provides involvement and progress in the general curriculum. In Georgia, the Georgia Performance
Standards are the curriculum for all students even those with the most significant cognitive disabilities.
By using this guide, the process of IEP development should not be too intimidating. The required elemen ts of the IEP are listed and discussed below with helpful hints to make the development of the IEP easier for the team.
Key Points
-Write the IEP so that the different sections of the IEP relate to each other and are all linked to the
PLAAFP.
-Base goals, supports, services on the information provided in the present levels.
-Write the IEP to document participation and progress in the general curriculum. That is everything is linked - - 1) present levels of performance (PLAAFP what the student does now) is linkedto the - 2) needs statement (baseline of performance change) - 3) annual goals quantify the outcome after a year of instruction (behavior/performance, conditions under which the behavior/performance will happen, and what is the expectation for level ofp erformance (criteria), - 4) supports (accommodations and modifications) necessary to achieve goal. And all must reflect expectations of movement towards progress in the general education curriculum. Cover Page
This first page of the IEP contains student information and IEP meeting information. Do not leave any
empty blank in this section. Typically, this section of the IEP contains a place for the appropriate team
members to sign in or be identified.
2
-Provide all required information. For the generic IEP, you may make updates and name.
-Check that you have signatures for all required participants.
Parent
Special Education Teacher
Regular Education Teacher
LEA Representative (District Agency Representative) Student (whenappropriate)
Related Services Providers (if applicable)
While not required -- you can role play this assignment with others -
- the input would be an important part of the process.
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
The language change in IDEA 2004 emphasized that determining where a child was performing acade-
mically was only part of the picture. Other areas of functional development (social, inappropriate
behavioral, etc.) also required attention in the Present Levels of Academic and Functional Performance
(PLAAFP) and from the IEP Team (Gibb & Dyches, 2007).
In Georgia, PLAAFP address:
· Results of the most recent evaluation and state and district assessments,
· Academic, developmental, and functional strengths,
· Academic, developmental, and functional needs,
· Parental concerns regarding their child’s education, and
· Impact of the disability on involvement and progress in the general education curriculum.
To be helpful, the Present Levels must be explicit, detailed, and completely current. The Present Levels
must define objective baseline performance for each area of need related to the student’s disability or
disabilities. Using the generic form, include this information in the Academic, developmental, and
functional needs section. This data is then used to develop measurable annual goals and
accommodations. There should be alignment between the Present Levels and other parts of the IEP.
Curriculum based measurement (CBM) is valuable in assessing students as it is aligned with the local
curriculum and instruction.
Personal opinions and other subjective measures are inappropriate to use to evaluate annual
goals.
3
Other background information about the student may be included in the Present Levels, but will not be
used in writing IEP goals and accommodations/modifications. This information might include the results
of nationally normed cognitive and achievement assessments.
**However, chunks of an assessment report should not be copied into the Present Levels.
Key Points
Identify and prioritize the academic and functional needs of the child that you address in goals and
accommodations.
Identify the other needs that result directly from the child’s disability. Provide baseline data
for each need in the needs section of the PLAAFP.
Write present levels that are specific, measurable, and objective. Curriculum based measurement(CB
M) is frequently used to determine present levels of performance that are aligned with the local
curriculum and instruction. Observational data are also helpful. These types of data are helpful because
they can be used in progress monitoring during the year.
Describe the student in a positive manner.
Report parental concerns in the present levels.
Under most recent evaluation and state test results, it is the common practice to put the most recent
cognitive test score (generally the Stanford-Binet-IV or WISC-IV) and the most recent state testing.
****Don’t put a long list of test results that are also in the psychological.
****Don’t keep a list of test results from year to year.
Consideration of Special Factors
Address these factors:
· Inappropriate Behavior
· Limited English Proficiency
· Blindness/Visual Impairment
· Communication Needs
· Deaf or Hard of Hearing
· Assistive Technology
· Alternative format for instructional materials
Each of the seven special factors must be addressed by indicating yes or no.
If yes, then further attachments or information may be necessary.
4
Transition Service Plan
In Georgia, the transition service plan is completed no later than entry into 9th grade or by age 16,
whichever comes first. Nothing prevents the IEP Team from developing a plan
earlier if it is determined to be appropriate. Check your state rules on when transition should be added
to the IEP.
**** For this course, a Transition Service Plan is not required.
Measurable Annual Goals
Measurable Annual Goals and ShortTerm Objectives/Benchmarks. Annual goals are written to meet the
unique needs of the child identified in the present levels. The Present Levels provide the baseline
information for the development of measurable annual goals. Annual goals in academic content areas
may be drawn from the general education curriculum but must be written in measurable form. Most
often goals address supplementary instruction that is needed to build skills and thus provide access to
the general curriculum.
Measurable annual goals, with objective criteria, detail what a child can reasonably be expected to
achieve within a 12-month period with the provision of special education and related services. To
accomplish this, the child’s performance is measured against the district’s standards or benchmarks for
basic skill areas. If the district does not have published benchmarks, then teachers may use those that
are in the research literature.
Three critical components of the annual measurable goal are:
· Conditions specify the manner in which progress toward the goal is measured.
Conditions are dependent on the behavior being measured and involve the application of skills
are knowledge. Examples:
o When presented with a second-grade reading passage,
o When given a mixed fourth-grade- level math calculation probe, or given a story prompt and three
minutes to write,
· Behavior clearly identifies the performance being monitored, usually reflects an action or can be
directly observed and is measurable. (do not include “will be able to”)
o Sarah will read
o John will correctly write the sum
o Sue will write
· Criterion identifies how much, how often, or to what standards the child (behavior) will
perform in order to demonstrate that the goal has been mastered. The goal criterion specifies the
amount of growth the child must make by the end of the annual goal period.
o 107 words per minute with 5 or fewer errors. or 85% or more of the problems presented.
5
o 37 words per minute.
****Please note the % is NOT required -- you will note that only one of the examples is a %
use of % in goals that are not appropriate will be penalized
Goals:
1. When presented with a second grade reading passage, Sarah will read 107 words per minute with 5 or fewer errors. 2. When given a mixed fourth-grade- level math calculation probe, John will correctly write the sum/difference/product/quotient for 85% or more of the problems presented. 3. When given a story to read (prompt to write a summary of the story) and three minutes to write, Sue will write 37 words per minute.
Elementary Example:
Present Level: Robert is a second grade student who does not decode basic sight words. According to DIBELS administered in August (at the start of his second grade year), he had an oral reading fluency of 4 2 words per minute. Goal: When given a second grade reading probe, Robert will increase his oral reading fluency to 89
words per minute. **** Explanation - Refer to the research norms for Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) for
the words per minute to use in the goal. If you are writing a goal in May for the following year, check
the students ORF on reading passages from the grade that he will be in for the following year.
In the example above, Robert was tested at the beginning of second grade and so the goal was written
on second grade norms.
Middle School Example:
Present Level: When given a mixed 7th grade level math calculation probe, in two minutes Jeff writes the answers (sum/difference/product/quotient) to the problems with 38 digits correct. He does not monitor his work for accuracy and tends to run through assignments in his general education math class. Goal: When given a mixed 7th grade math calculation probe, in two minutes Jeff will complete the problems with 68 digits correct.
High School Example:
Present Level: Joe does not organize his written work so that it makes sense to the reader and conveyst he information that he intends. When Jeff’s written work is graded, for punctuation and spelling, he averages 50% accuracy. Goal: When given grade level writing assignments, Jeff will plan his papers using prewriting strategies (freewriting, clustering, and outlining) resulting in a paragraph that provides only information on the topic that includes main topic, example/fact and detail. Goal: When given grade level writing assignments, Jeff will edit his papers with 90% accuracy for both punctuation and spelling. Short term Objectives
6
Check short-term objectives are “benchmarks” for indicating progress towards goals
- same action verb as goal.
Write short-term objectives/benchmarks that set high (yet reasonable) expectations to lead to goals.
Typically, the same number as when “grades reports” are issued -
- to give parents the progress report that student is on target to meet annual goal (four are typical -
- every nine weeks, etc.)
Student Supports
Accommodations, supplemental aids and services, and supports for school personnel are documented in this area. In determining whether a student needs accommodations or modifications, use the information below. Accommodations are:
·adaptations of general curriculum that do not modify content and do not reduce learning expectations
·supports or services provided to help a student access and demonstrate learning
(Bowers, 2004, State Rules, 2007).
Example: In the grade level student text, substitute easier words for the more difficult vocabulary. Put
the easier words on a transparency that students place over the page.
Example: Provide a skeletal set of notes for the student with disabilities that has difficulty with writing.
Modifications are:
· changes in content and performance expectations (Bowers, 2004)
· substantial alterations of what a student is expected to learn and demonstrate.
Example: Delete certain standards in the general curriculum for a student with disabilities.
Example: Utilizing a specialized curriculum written at a lower level.
Note: Batemen and Linden (2006) do not differentiate between accommodations and modifications.
Many ofthe modifications listed on pages 138 and 139 are accommodations.
Commonly Used Supports-
This is a brief list of commonly used supports that you can reference for ideas asyou write your IEP.
Certainly, there are many other supports that can be used for students with disabilities. Instructional
Accommodations should be individualized for the student. Accommodations must relate to the nature
of the disability and must not be a merely a list of items that might work for the student. Select the key
accommodations that the student needs and monitor the use and implementation of the
accommodations.
Instructional Accommodations
7
· John has very poor writing skills and is extremely slow in completing notes in the classroom. His
notes are generally incomplete and difficult to read. Provide student a copy of lecture notes. Have him
use a highlighter during lecture to highlight key vocabulary and points made by the teacher. John may al
soneed additional time to complete written assignments in the classroom.
· Suzy is extremely disorganized and often loses textbooks. Provide a home set of
textbooks/materials.
- Allison can understand the Social Studies content when it is read to her.
Provide the student with books on tape for Social Studies.
·Joe is easily distracted in the classroom and requires preferential seating.
Classroom Test Accommodations-
Test accommodations should be instructional accommodations that the student needs to access
classroom tests. Many instructional accommodations would not be appropriate for classroom testing
accommodations. In the examples above extended time and preferential seating might be included as
classroom test accommodations.
Supplemental Aides and Services
Tutoring
Adult assistance
Positive behavior supports or behavior improvement plan
Communication needs for deaf/hearing impaired (FM System)
Supports for SchoolSystem Personnel
Training for teachers on an assistive technology device used by the student
Staff Development on a multisensory reading program used by students
Key Points
Select accommodations that relate to the students needs identified in the present levels.
Individualize accommodations.
Provide only the accommodations that the student needs to access and make progress in the general
curriculum.
Monitor implementation of the accommodations.
Assessment Determination for District and Statewide Assessments for Grades K-12
This section documents the type of assessment determined for students— required state assessments or analternative assessment. If a student is participating in regular
8
assessments, then accommodations may be madethat are consistent with those approved by the state. In Georgia, teachers should consult the most currentStudent Assessment Handbook for these approved accommodations. In Georgia accommodations used on state testing ‘must be aligned with and be a part of daily instruction” (Georgia Department of Education, 2008, p. 7). This means that state test accommodations must also be classroom and instructional accommodations. Others States provide guidance on their state web site. Commonly Used Accommodations-
This is not an exhaustive list of accommodations. This is a brief list that
you can reference as you write IEPs.
Setting Accommodations
Small group
Preferential seating
Scheduling Accommodations
Extended time
Frequent monitored breaks
Presentation Accommodations
Large print
Braille
Color overlays, templates, or place markers
Response Accommodations
Scribe
Adapted writing tools
Special Education: Instruction/Related Services in General Education
Special Education: Instruction/Related Services Outside of the General Education Classroom
In Georgia, you check the options considered and then fill in the required information for the options
that are selected. You must document in the IEP all the services to be delivered on behalf of the child
and provide frequency, dates and location of services. All IEPs must document an explanation of the
extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with nondisabled peers in the general education
classroom and in the nonacademic and extracurricular activities.
Key Points
Decide placement after goals, objectives, and supports are agreed upon
Determine if placement is in the least restrictive environment
9
Provide an explanation if the student is not participating in all general education activities
Select placement(s) that provide support for the student’s identified needs.
Extended School Year
Extended School Year (ESY) must be considered annually and it extends goals and/or objectives from the current IEP. States provide guidelines on determining eligibility for ESY. If the IEP Team determines that ESY is needed, then the team should describe the type of service needed. Provide the frequency, duration, service provider, and location. New goals cannot be created and addedto the IEP for ESY services. Districts provide ESY when those services are needed so the student with a disability may receive benefit from his/her educational program during the school year. ESY services are not provided just because the child would benefit from the services. Teams must look at multiple factors and determine if the services are necessary for the student.
The individual needs of the child should be considered along with such factors as:
· the severity of the disability
· the age of the child
· transitional needs
· the rate of progress or regression that may limit the child’s ability to achieve IEP
goals/objectives
· relative importance of IEP goals at issue
· whether the child is at a critical point of instruction, such as emerging skills
· whether there were any delays or interruptions in services during the school year
(Georgia Department of Education, 2007)
Key Points
Document the consideration of ESY at least annually. (Example: John is making progress on his IEP goals
and should master his goals according to the timelines in his IEP. Extended School Year services are not
needed at this time.)
Make decisions for ESY on multiple factors. (Example: John’s progress on mastering basic reading skills has been very slow during this school year. He has just mastered blending of C - V- Cworks. ESY is recommended so that he can continue practice on this critical skill in order to master his IEP goals in this area. His IEP goals in reading are a priority for his teachers and parents.) Make sure that you are documenting progress on annual goals throughout the year. This will help in the determination of ESY. Base ESY services on existing goals.
10
Bateman, B. D. & Linden, M. A. (2006). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
Bateman, B. D. & Herr, C. M. (2006). Writing measurable IEP goals and objectives. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
Georgia Department of Education. (2008). Accommodations manual: A guide to selecting, administering, and evaluating the use of test administration accommodations for students with disabilities.
Gibb, G. S., & Dyches, T. T. (2007). A guide to writing quality individualized education programs. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
IEP Final Assignment Rubric.pdf
IEP Final Assignment Rubric
Criteria 1 Proficient
20 points
Target
16 points
Acceptable
14 points
Unacceptable
12 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
PLAAFP
Only results of
recent state/district
assessments relevant
current performance
information necessary to
respond to the five areas in
the PLAAFP section to
establish baseline for goals
included. No unrelated
testing is included.
All strengths are tied to
State/District testing and
written as measurable
statements. All information
necessary to write goals is
included.
All needs statements are
tied to State/District
testing and strength
statements and written as a
measurable baseline
(starting point for goals).
All information necessary
to write goals is included.
All parental
concern statements
directly related to writing
Most results of
recent state/district
assessments relevant
current performance
information necessary to
respond to the five areas in
the PLAAFP section to
establish baseline for goals
is included. Some
unrelated testing is
included.
Most strengths are tied to
State/District testing and
written as mostly
measurable statements.
Most information
necessary to write goals is
included.
Most needs statements are
tied to State/District testing
and strength statements
and written as a
measurable baseline
(starting point for goals).
Most information
necessary to write goals is
included.
Some results of
recent state/district
assessments relevant
current performance
information necessary to
respond to the five areas in
the PLAAFP section to
establish baseline for goals
is included. Much
unrelated testing is
included.
Some strengths are tied to
State/District testing and
written as somewhat
measurable statements.
Some information
necessary to write goals is
included. Some
information is omitted.
Some needs statements are
tied to State/District testing
and strength statements
and written as a
measurable baseline
(starting point for goals).
Some information
A few of the results of
recent state/district
assessments relevant
current performance
information necessary to
respond to the five areas
(or less) in the PLAAFP
section to establish
baseline for goals is
included. Most of testing
includes is unrelated.
Few strengths are tied to
State/District testing and
not written as measurable
statements. Much
information necessary to
write goals is not included
or irrelevant. Some
information is omitted.
Few needs statements are
tied to State/District testing
and strength statements
and most not written as a
measurable baseline
(starting point for goals).
Most information
/20
goals. Specific
statement(s) specifically
describing how the
"disability" will impact
participation in the general
education curriculum.
Most parental
concern statements
directly related to writing
goals. General statement(s)
describing how his
"disability" will impact
participation in the general
education curriculum.
necessary to write goals is
not included.
Some parental
concern statements
directly related to writing
goals. Vague statement(s)
describing how the
"disability" will impact
participation in the general
education curriculum.
necessary to write goals is
not included.
Few parental
concern statements
directly related to writing
goals. Appear to be merely
a "cut and paste" from
psychological report.
Statement(s) describing
how the "disability" will
impact participation in the
general education
curriculum not relevant or
incorrect.
Criteria 2 Exemplary
20 points
Target
16 points
Acceptable
14 points
Unacceptable
12 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
Measurable
Annual
Goals 1 & 2
ALL elements below
clearly addressed
for two annual goals:
Measurable goal
statements clearly related
to baseline; based on 1
year expectations; related
to standards and
benchmarks and includes:
*conditions
(materials/stimuli),
*behavior (measurable and
observable skill-uses
action verb),
*criteria (specifically state
what the student will do in
MOST (2 or 3 incorrect or
missing) elements below
clearly addressed for two
annual goals:
Measurable goal
statements mostly related
to baseline; based on 1
year expectations; mostly
related to standards and
benchmarks and includes
(one or two may be
missing or incorrect) :
*conditions
(materials/stimuli),
*behavior (measurable and
observable skill-uses
SOME (4 or more not
addressed correctly or
missing) elements below
clearly addressed for two
annual goals :
Measurable goal
statements somewhat
related to baseline; may
not be based on 1 year
expectations; somewhat
related to standards and
benchmarks and generally
includes (more than two
may be missing or
incorrect):
*conditions
MANY (5 or more not
addressed correctly or
missing) elements below
clearly addressed:
Measurable goal
statements related to
baseline; based on 1 year
expectations; related to
standards and benchmarks
and includes:
*conditions
(materials/stimuli),
*behavior (measurable and
observable skill-uses
action verb),
*criteria (specifically state
/20
the action);
supported by baseline data
from PLAAFP using same
level of measure; address
needs the result from
disability identified in
PLAAFP; provides access
to general education
curriculum.
action verb),
*criteria (specifically state
what the student will do in
the action);
supported by baseline data
from PLAAFP using same
level of measure; address
needs the result from
disability identified in
PLAAFP; provides access
to general education
curriculum.
(materials/stimuli),
*behavior (measurable and
observable skill-uses
action verb),
*criteria (specifically state
what the student will do in
the action);
supported by baseline data
from PLAAFP using same
level of measure; address
needs the result from
disability identified in
PLAAFP; provides access
to general education
curriculum.
what the student will do in
the action);
supported by baseline data
from PLAAFP using same
level of measure; address
needs the result from
disability identified in
PLAAFP; provides access
to general education
curriculum.
Criteria 3 Exemplary
5 points
Target
4 points
Acceptable
3 points
Unacceptable
2 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
Method of
Evaluation
Goals 1 and
2
ALL elements below
clearly addressed for two
annual goals:
Procedures include
assessment strategies, what
data will be collected and
how often to monitor
student progress.
*aligns with baseline and
goal criterion, clear
repeatable measures of
progress toward goal;
*includes how often
progress will measure e.g
document observation,
charts, tally sheets, CBM
probes;
MOST (2 or 3 incorrect or
missing) elements below
clearly addressed:
Procedures include
assessment strategies, what
data will be collected and
how often to monitor
student progress.
*aligns with baseline and
goal criterion, clear
repeatable measures of
progress toward goal;
*includes how often
progress will measure e.g
document observation,
charts, tally sheets, CBM
probes;
SOME (4 incorrect or
missing) elements below
clearly addressed:
Procedures include
assessment strategies, what
data will be collected and
how often to monitor
student progress.
*aligns with baseline and
goal criterion, clear
repeatable measures of
progress toward goal;
*includes how often
progress will measure e.g
document observation,
charts, tally sheets, CBM
probes;
MANY (5 or more
incorrect or missing)
elements below clearly
addressed:
Procedures include
assessment strategies, what
data will be collected and
how often to monitor
student progress.
*aligns with baseline and
goal criterion, clear
repeatable measures of
progress toward goal;
*includes how often
progress will measure e.g
document observation,
charts, tally sheets, CBM
/5
*provides sufficient
measurement intervals to
evaluate progress toward
achieving goal by the end
of the year
*provides sufficient
measurement intervals to
evaluate progress toward
achieving goal by the end
of the year
*provides sufficient
measurement intervals to
evaluate progress toward
achieving goal by the end
of the year
probes;
*provides sufficient
measurement intervals to
evaluate progress toward
achieving goal by the end
of the year
Criteria 4 Proficient
20 points
Target
16 points
Acceptable
14 points
Unacceptable
12 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
Short Term
Instructiona
l
Objectives/
Milestones
Goals 1 & 2
ALL of the elements below
are clearly addressed:
Includes three or more
measurable short term
objectives/benchmarks:
one goal uses benchmarks
and one goal uses short
term objectives
*conditions
(material/stimuli)statement
s/objective/milestones
*behavior
(behavior (measurable and
observable action verb)
*criteria (stats what the
student will do)
in logical progression
toward goal; starting points
is the baseline
score/percentage; ending
point is the goal
score/percentage;
intermediate dates are
MOST (2 or 3 incorrect or
missing) of the elements
below are clearly
addressed: Includes three
or more measurable short
term
objectives/benchmarks:
one goal uses benchmarks
and one goal uses short
term objectives
*conditions
(material/stimuli)statement
s/objective/milestones
*behavior
(behavior (measurable and
observable action verb)
*criteria (stats what the
student will do)
in logical progression
toward goal; starting points
is the baseline
score/percentage; ending
point is the goal
SOME 4 incorrect or
missing) of the elements
below are clearly
addressed: Includes three
or more measurable short
term
objectives/benchmarks:
both goals may use
benchmarks OR short term
objective only
*conditions
(material/stimuli)statement
s/objective/milestones
*behavior
(behavior (measurable and
observable action verb)
*criteria (stats what the
student will do)
in logical progression
toward goal; starting points
is the baseline
score/percentage; ending
point is the goal
MANY (5 or more
incorrect or missing) of the
elements below are clearly
addressed: Includes three
or less measurable short
term
objectives/benchmarks:
both goals may use
benchmarks OR short term
objective only
*conditions
(material/stimuli)statement
s/objective/milestones
*behavior
(behavior (measurable and
observable action verb)
*criteria (stats what the
student will do)
in logical progression
toward goal; starting points
is the baseline
score/percentage; ending
point is the goal
/20
reasonable and attainable
to meet goal at the end of
year; dates expected
included.
score/percentage;
intermediate dates are
reasonable and attainable
to meet goal at the end of
year; dates expected
included.
score/percentage;
intermediate dates are
reasonable and attainable
to meet goal at the end of
year; dates expected
included.
score/percentage;
intermediate dates are
reasonable and attainable
to meet goal at the end of
year; dates expected
included.
Criteria 5 Proficient
25 points
Target
20 points
Acceptable
17 points
Unacceptable
15 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
Student
Supports
Instructional and
Classroom Testing
Accommodations: ALL C
learly related to strength
AND needs statements
from PLAAFP. Considers
child approaches to
learning. Enable student to
make progress to achieve
goal(s) by the end of
school year. Do not change
content.
Supplemental Aids and
Services: All are clearly
specifically designed
instruction (e.g. direct
instruction in basic reading
skills) OR transportation.
Clearly assist the student
in benefiting in general
education.
Supports for School
Personnel: All provide
Instructional and
Classroom Testing
Accommodations: Mostly
(one or two do not) related
to strength AND needs
statements from PLAAFP.
Mostly considers child
approaches to learning.
Enable student to make
progress to achieve goal(s)
by the end of school year.
Do not change content.
Supplement Aids and
Service: Most are
generally designed
instruction (e.g. direct
instruction in basic reading
skills) OR transportation.
Generally assist the student
in benefiting in general
education.
Supports for School
Personnel: Most provide
Instructional and
Classroom Testing
Accommodations: Somew
hat (more than two) related
to strength AND needs
statements from PLAAFP.
Many do not clearly
consider child approaches
to learning. Vaguely
enable student to make
progress to achieve goal(s)
by the end of school year.
Do not change content.
Supplement Aids and
Services: Most are
vaguely designed
instruction (e.g. direct
instruction in basic reading
skills) OR transportation.
Vaguely assist the student
in benefiting in general
education.
Instructional and
Classroom Testing
Accommodations: Not
related to strength AND
needs statements from
PLAAFP. Do not clearly
consider child approaches
to learning. May not
clearly enable student to
make progress to achieve
goal(s) by the end of
school year. Do not change
content.
Supplemental Aids and
Services: Most are not
specifically designed
instruction (e.g. direct
instruction in basic reading
skills) OR transportation.
Vaguely assist the student
in benefiting in general
education.
/25
clear descriptive
statements provided for
necessary professional
learning and training for
staff or parents to implant
the specialized services.
District-wide
Assessment: All accomm
odations or modifications,
if necessary, clearly
described and aligned with
accommodations. Relate to
student's needs, used as an
instruction. Clearly specify
how general /special
education teachers will
carry out
accommodations.
clear descriptive
statements provided for
necessary professional
learning and training for
staff or parents to implant
the specialized services.
District-wide
Assessment: Most accom
modations or
modifications, if necessary,
clearly described and
aligned with
accommodations. Relate to
student's needs, used as an
instruction. Clearly specify
how general /special
education teachers will
carry
out accommodations.
Supports for School
Personnel: provide vague
descriptive statements
provided for necessary
professional learning and
training for staff or parents
to implant the specialized
services.
District-wide
Assessment: many accom
modations or
modifications, if necessary,
are vaguely described and
aligned with
accommodations. Relate to
student's needs, used as an
instruction.
Vaguely specify how
general /special education
teachers will carry
out accommodations.
Supports for School
Personnel: statements not
provided for necessary
professional learning and
training for staff or parents
to implant the specialized
services.
District-wide
Assessment: No
accommodations or
modifications, if necessary,
described and/or not
aligned with
accommodations. May not
relate to student's needs,
and/or used as an
instruction. Generally
specify how general
/special education teachers
will carry out
accommodations.
Criteria 6 Proficient
10 points
Target
8 points
Acceptable
7 points
Unacceptable
6 points
Crite
rion
Scor
e
Completene
ss of IEP
Form and
Mechanics
ALL sections of IEP form
addressed (use of n/a
where appropriate).
Correct use of person first
language. No errors in
grammar, spelling,
capitalization and
Most sections of IEP form
addressed (may be one or
two blank sections without
n/a used) Correct use of
person first language. a
few (one or two) errors in
grammar, spelling,
Several sections of IEP
form not addressed or
incorrect. Mostly correct
use of person first
language. More than a few
(three or more) errors in
grammar, spelling,
Many sections of IEP form
not addressed or incorrect.
Many errors in use of
person first language.
Many (four or more) errors
in grammar, spelling,
capitalization and
/10
abbreviations correctly
provided. Overall
presentation of information
easy to read and presented
coherently.
capitalization and
abbreviations correctly
provided. Overall
presentation of information
readable and presented
mostly organized.
capitalization and
abbreviations not correctly
provided. Overall
presentation of information
somewhat readable and
presented somewhat
organized.
abbreviations not correctly
provided. Overall
presentation of information
difficult to read and
presented somewhat
unorganized.
Total /100
Case Study to be used for Final IEP assignment.pdf
Case Study-Sue Jones Psychological Summary
Name: Sue Jones
Grade: entering grade 7
The following progress monitoring and psychological information was obtained on Sue at the end of the 6th grade (April). You are preparing a draft IEP for a meeting at the end of 6th grade. The IEP you will be drafting will be implemented during Sue’s 7th grade year.
Timeline: Classroom Observation: April 6th Grade Individual Assessment: April 6th Grade CBM and Additional Collection of Information for IEP: April 6th Grade IEP Meeting Spring 6th Grade Background Information Sue is a 6th grade student. She has been eligible for special under the category of emotional and behavioral disorder since second grade. Currently she receives special education services in a pull-out study skills class for one hour per day. Sue is presently failing in all academic classes. Her oral vocabulary and listening comprehension skills are strengths. Sue can comprehend grade level material in science and social studies when she attends to the material. Math is extremely difficult for her because she is missing so many basic skills.
She is consistently off-task and unruly in the classroom environment. Difficulties in social interactions with her peers are often observed. Other students do not want to sit with Sue or interact with her during free time. She displays an unwillingness to complete classroom assignments.
Sue was previously evaluated in 4th grade and achieved a full scale IQ of 93 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth edition (WISC-V).
Case Study Sue Jones 2 According to information provided by her mother on the Student Information Form, Sue lives with her parents and three younger siblings. Her mother noted that she was the product of a uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. Sue has a history of attention deficit disorder and has taken numerous medications through the years to address this difficulty. She passed vision and hearing screening at the end of 6th grade.
Sue’s parents did not attend any conferences this year. However, during a phone conversation with Sue’s special education teacher Mrs. Jones admitted that they have little control over Sue at home. She would like for Sue to get as much help as possible with her inappropriate and unruly behavior.
Test Results-State Assessments
Georgia Milestones End-of-Grade Assessments Spring 6th grade
Content Area Scaled Score Performance Level
English / Language Arts 525 Proficient Learner
Mathematics 555 Proficient Learner
Science Not assessed this grade
Social Studies Not assessed this grade
Classroom Observation
An observation was conducted by the School Psychologist in April of her 6th grade year, during mathematics class. Sue was distracted (talking to others, getting personal items from her desk, physically shifting around at her desk) for much of the observation. She also made six inappropriate comments to peers and adults (cursing, talking back, argumentative) during this time. During the 20-minute observation, she was on task 40% of the time. This is consistent with what his teachers report.
Test Results-Individual Assessment (April, 6th grade)
According to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 5th edition (WISC-V), Sue obtained a Verbal Score of 112 (High Average) and a Performance Score of 89 (Low average) Her Full Scale Score of 91 falls within the average range . However, due to her unpredictable behavior during the test session, these test results may not accurately reflect her true potential.
Case Study Sue Jones 3 Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition (WIAT-III) was administered with the following results:
Area Standard Score
Word Reading
Reading Comprehension
Pseudoword Decoding
79
69
76
Borderline
Extremely low
Borderline
Reading Composite 72 Borderline
Spelling
Written Expression
73
71
Borderline
Borderline
Writing Composite 69 Extremely low
Numerical Operations
Math Reasoning
81
73
Low
Borderline
Math Composite 75 Borderline
Listening Comprehension
Oral Expression
90
82
Average
Low
Oral Language Composite 82 Low
The Behavior Assessment System for Children-Third edition (BASC-3) was completed by Sue’s special education teacher. Clinically significant areas reported included hyperactivity, aggression, depression, attention problems, learning problems, atypicality, withdrawal, and inappropriate social skills.
Eligibility
Sue continues to be eligible for special education as a student with emotional and behavioral disorders.
Curriculum Based Assessment for the IEP Meeting (April 6th grade)
AIMSweb (a benchmark and progress monitor system) reported Oral Reading Fluency of 145 words read correctly (WRC) in one minute. Students at the end of the 6th grade should read (110-160 words per minute) This indicates average oral reading fluency skills for entering 7th grade.
Case Study Sue Jones 4 On the MAZE Curriculum Based Measurement (MAZE CBM), Sue achieved a Words Correctly Restored (WCR) score of 17 on a 6th grade passage. This falls at the 25th percentile on the spring 6th grade norms. Students exiting 6th grade (spring norms) should correctly restore 22 words (50th percentile) and 33 words (75th percentile). Sue is failing math. She has does not meet grade level expectations with all types of problems (computation and written) and does not retain math facts. On a two-minute math fluency
probe of mixed 6th grade problems, Sue obtained a score of 18 falls below the 25th percentile for students in 6th grade and suggest a weakness in math computation fluency. Students in 7th grade should complete the probe with at least 32 digits correct (AIMSweb, Spring, 50th
percentile). Writing is another area where Sue does not meet grade level expectations. A three-minute writing probe using a 6th grade story starter showed 18 correct word sequences. This falls below the 10th percentile according to the AIMSweb norms. Students at the end of the 6th grade should complete a writing sample with 51 correct word sequences (AIMSweb, spring norms, 50th percentile). Students in 7th grade (fall norms 50%) should have 53 correct word sequences (fall norms 50%).
Additional Classroom Observations Completion of classwork was noted as a problem on the referral for reevaluation. In checking with her teachers, the following was reported:
Math Classwork-Completes 40% of assigned work
Homework-Completes 50% of assigned work during study skills
Language Arts Classwork-Completes 30% of assigned work
Homework-Completes 80% of assigned work during study skills Science Classwork-Completes 70% of assigned work (modified)
Homework-Completes 80% of assigned work during study skills
Social Studies Classwork-Completes 70% of assigned work (modified)
Homework-Completes 80% of assigned work during study skills
IEP_Sample_Form_revised.doc
Student Name:__________________________________________ Meeting Date:____________________________________
Student Name:____________________________________ Meeting Date:____________________________________
__________________SCHOOL SYSTEM
INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP)
|
IEP Meeting Date: |
Purpose of IEP Meeting : Initial ( Annual Review ( Amendment ( |
|
|
Student Name: |
Date of Birth: |
GTID# |
|
Eligibility Category(s): |
Most Recent Eligibility Date(s): |
|
|
School: |
Grade: |
School Year: |
|
Parent(s): |
||
|
Address: |
Email: |
|
|
Phone (home): |
(work): |
(cell phone): |
TEAM MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE
|
REQUIRED MEMBERS |
|
ADDITIONAL MEMBERS |
|
Parent: |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Parent: |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Local Education Agency Representative (LEA): |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Special Education Teacher: |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Regular Education Teacher: |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Student (age 18 or if transition is being discussed): |
|
Name/Title:
|
|
Agency representative (responsible for transition services): |
|
Name/Title:
|
I. PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE
|
Results of initial or most recent evaluation and results of state and district assessments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of academic, developmental and/or functional strengths: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of academic, developmental and/or functional needs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parental concerns regarding their child’s education: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of the disability on involvement and progress in the general education curriculum (for preschool, how the disability affects participation in appropriate activities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 7
II. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS
a) Does the student have behavior which impedes his/her learning or the learning of others? ( Yes ( No
If yes, consider the appropriateness of developing a Behavior Intervention Plan.
Behavior Intervention Plan developed? ( Yes ( No
Refer to Behavior Intervention Plan for additional information.
b) Does the student have Limited English proficiency? ( Yes ( No
If yes, consider the language needs as related to the IEP and describe below.
c) Does the student have blindness/visual impairment? ( Yes ( No
If yes, provide for instruction in Braille and the use of Braille, unless the IEP Team determines that instruction in Braille is not appropriate for the student after an evaluation of the student’s reading and writing skills, needs, and appropriate reading and writing media, including evaluation of future needs for instruction in Braille or the use of Braille. Describe below.
d) Does the student have communication needs? ( Yes ( No
If yes, consider the communication needs and describe below.
e) Is the student deaf or hard of hearing? ( Yes ( No
If yes, consider and describe the student’s language and communication needs, opportunities for direct communication with peers and professional personnel in the student’s language and communication mode, academic level and full range of needs, including opportunities for direct instruction in the student’s language and communication mode. Describe communication needs below.
f) Does the student need assistive technology devices or services? ( Yes ( No
If yes, describe the type of assistive technology and how it is used. If no, describe how the student’s needs are being met in deficit areas.
g) Does the student require alternative format for instructional materials? ( Yes ( No
If yes, specify format(s) of materials required below.
|
( Braille ( Large type ( Auditory ( Electronic text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. TRANSITION SERVICE PLAN
A transition service plan must be completed no later than entry into 9th grade or by age 16, whichever comes first, or younger, if determined appropriate by the IEP team and updated annually. If transition service plan is developed, attach to the IEP.
Page 2 of 7
IV. MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOALS
|
Measurable Annual Goals: Academic and/or functional goals designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum or to meet each of the child’s other educational needs that result from the disability. |
Criteria for Mastery |
Method of Evaluation |
Progress At Reporting Period |
|||
|
|
|
|
1 (date) |
2 (date) |
3 (date) |
4 (date) |
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORT OF STUDENT PROGRESS
When will the parents be informed of the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals?
|
|
Page 3 of 7
V. MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOALS & SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES/BENCHMARKS
Academic and/or functional goals designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum or to meet each of the child’s other educational needs that result from the disability.
MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOAL:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Short term objectives/benchmarks: Measurable, intermediate steps or targeted sub-skills to enable student to reach annual goals. |
Criteria for Mastery |
Method of Evaluation |
Progress At Reporting Period |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
1 (date) |
2 (date) |
3 (date) |
4 (date) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI. MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOALS & SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES/BENCHMARKS
Academic and/or functional goals designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum or to meet each of the child’s other educational needs that result from the disability.
MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOAL:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Short term objectives/benchmarks: Measurable, intermediate steps or targeted sub-skills to enable student to reach annual goals. |
Criteria for Mastery |
Method of Evaluation |
Progress At Reporting Period |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
1 (date) |
2 (date) |
3 (date) |
4 (date) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORT OF STUDENT PROGRESS
When will the parents be informed of the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals?
Page 4 of 7
VII. STUDENT SUPPORTS
To advance appropriately toward attaining annual goals; to be involved and progress in the general curriculum; to be educated and participate with other children in academic, nonacademic and extracurricular activities, the following accommodations, supplemental aids and services and/or supports for school personnel will be provided:
|
Instructional Accommodations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classroom Testing Accommodations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Aids and Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supports for School Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIII. ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION FOR DISTRICT AND STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS FOR GRADES K-12
a) The student will participate in the following regular required assessments (Each state mandated test and subtest must be considered individually and documented below).
Specific Testing Accommodations (Accommodations used for assessment must be consistent with accommodations used for classroom instruction/testing and specified in the IEP. Some accommodations used for instruction may not be allowed for statewide assessment. Refer to the GaDOE Student Assessment Handbook for the only allowable accommodations. Conditional accommodations are only allowable for students who meet eligibility criteria.) All subtests must be considered individually. If the CRCT-M is considered, the Participation Guidelines for the CRCT-M must be completed and attached.
|
Test |
Subtest |
Setting |
Timing/Scheduling |
Presentation |
Response |
None, Standard or Conditional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) The student will participate in all required assessments without accommodations Yes No
b) The student will participate in all required assessments with accommodations Yes No
If yes, complete the chart below.
c) The student will participate in the Georgia Alternate Assessment (GAA) Yes No
If yes, provide a statement of why the child cannot participate in regular assessment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IX. SPECIAL EDUCATION: Instruction/Related Services in General Education Classroom/Early Childhood Setting
|
Options Considered ( |
|
Frequency |
Initiation of Services (mm/dd/yy) |
Anticipated Duration (mm/dd/yy) |
Provider Title |
Content/Specialty Area(s) |
|
|
Consultative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-teaching |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supportive Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. SPECIAL EDUCATION: Instruction/Related Services Outside of the General Education Classroom
|
Options Considered ( |
|
Frequency |
Initiation of Services (mm/dd/yy) |
Anticipated Duration (mm/dd/yy) |
Provider Title |
Content/Specialty Area(s) |
|
|
Separate Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separate School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital/Homebound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supportive Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XI. The explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with peers without disabilities in the regular class and/or in nonacademic and extracurricular activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 7
XII. EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR
a) Are extended school year services necessary? ( Yes ( No
If yes, complete the section below.
b) Goals to be extended or modified:
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Services |
Frequency |
Initiation of Services (mm/dd/yy) |
Anticipated Duration (mm/dd/yy) |
Provider Title |
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XIII. DOCUMENTATION OF NOTICE OF IEP MEETING
|
|
Date |
Method of Notification |
By Whom |
|
1st Notification |
|
(Invitation ( Phone Call ( In Person (Reminder notice (Other: |
|
|
2nd Notification |
|
(Invitation ( Phone Call ( In Person (Reminder notice (Other: |
|
|
3rd Notification |
|
(Invitation (Phone Call ( In Person (Reminder notice (Other: |
|
XIV. PARENT PARTICIPATION IN THE IEP PROCESS
The following documents were provided to parent(s):
· Parental Rights in Special Education
· Individualized Education Program (IEP)
· Eligibility Report(s)
· Evaluation
· Other:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If parent did not attend the meeting, complete below:
On _____________the documents were: ( Mailed ( Given In Person ( Sent via Student ( Other______________
Page 7 of 7
Georgia Department of Education
August 2007
Page 4 of 8
Georgia Department of Education
Model Form July 2011
Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 1.pdf
Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 2.pdf
Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 3.pdf
Table of Contents.html
| Individualized Educ Prog (IEP) Section Y03 Summer 2025 CO - Week 8 Completing the IEP Assignment
2. Final IEP Assignment Instructions 4. IEP Final Assignment Rubric 5. Case Study to be used for Final IEP assignment 7. Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 1 8. Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 2 9. Sample IEP for IEP Assignment Example Part 3 |