prototype and storyboard project
Hunnysid
IndividualHEReportTEMPLATE1.docx
Heuristic Evaluation
Introduction
Heuristic evaluation is…….( Some generic information about the process here – referenced!!)
This report provides the results of a heuristic evaluation of a paper prototype by XXXX of Y team. The paper prototype is for an application called “XY” which is designed to “ outline what the app is supposed to do’ [See appendix 1 for photos of the prototype parts provided for this evaluation, and a video of how this prototype works, provided by XXXX of y team]
This report will initially …. Explain what is in the report
Procedure
To evaluate the prototype, the Y team has outlined the use of the following heuristics: [List the heuristics provided by your team here],
As part of the evaluation, I am asking my peer to perform the following tasks: [Outline the tasks and explain the steps you will take to perform the heuristic evaluation]
1.
2.
3, etc
Videos of the prototype I want to have evaluated and the briefing I gave are here:
· Prototype walkthrough: Put the video of your walkthrough here
· Prototype facilitation: Put a video of your facilitation of your peer’s evaluation
Results of Expert Review
Refer to assessment task
The expert review on the paper prototype resulted in the following findings: -
Show your results in a radar chart (see https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Present-your-data-in-a-radar-chart-16e20279-eed4-43c2-9bf5-29ff9b10601d ) for details
What worked?
Major Problems:
Minor Problems:
Recommendations
What needs fixing?
Detailed Heuristic Evaluation – My response to my peers work
|
Violated Heuristic:
|
Frequency:
|
Persistence:
|
Impact:
|
Severity Rating (SR): |
|
Prototype Screen shot
|
Description of Problem(s): · |
|||
|
|
User Comments: (explanation of problem)
|
|||
|
|
Ways to Rectify:
|
|||
|
|
Answers to Questions:
|
Sample Heuristic Evaluation with data
|
Violated Heuristic: VisibilityLIST THE SPECIFIC ASPECT OF THE HEURISTIC HERE |
Frequency: Often |
Persistence: Throughout the prototype |
Impact: Outline the impact |
Severity Rating (SR): include an appropriate rating |
|
Prototype Screenshot:
|
Description of Problem(s): · EG No time status on the processing screen. E.g. doesn’t inform the user the percentage/ time left of the processing. (SR – 2) · |
|||
|
|
User Impact (explanation how the problem will impact on users) · EG Slow users down as the users will become impatient when they have to wait without knowing the time status of the process |
|||
|
|
Ways to Rectify: · Use a progress indicator e.g. percentage or time status · Provide an appropriate feedback about what the system is doing. E.g. instead of ‘Processing’ use ‘Processing rescheduled lunch’ · Use percentage indictor for zoom in and zoom out. |
|||
|
|
Answers to Questions: HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO THE HEURISTIC ASPECT BEING EVALUATED · Users want to have time status visible without interrupting their other work |
Reflection on HE process
Refer to assessment task
For the research section of the assessment there is as per previous submissions 20% each for
1. Theory: What sort of prototype are you making and what does this contribute to your design
2. Practical: What sort of tests will justify your assumptions about your design, maybe consider future tests with different hardware set up if relevant to your domain
Videos of my Facilitation Process
Mine
1. Facilitation Video - GOOD EXAMPLE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0Voru1Uwhs&list=UUFU6ls18ZslLsIjr-p3dwGg&index=1
2. Prototype Walkthrough: GOOD EXAMPLE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyN2oGA1tCs&list=UUFU6ls18ZslLsIjr-p3dwGg&index=3
Prototypes
Attach images of your storyboard and paper prototypes, that are visible
References
include if you have referenced something in your write up.
Appendix 1: Client Prototype and videos
PAPER PROTOTYPE of XXXXX of TeamY
· Prototype Walkthrough: [link to video]
· Heuristic Briefing/Facilitation
Paper prototype pieces
Appendix 2
Client Heuristics
List the heuristics that you have been asked to use to analyse the paper prototype
5
