BA Case Analysis
Richard Holmes
IndividualcaseanalysisRubric3.xlsxreport-rubric
| WHO/WHAT/WHY/WHEN | MISSING (0%) | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | |||||
| 8 pts | Does not include Who/What/Why/When section. | Missing three descriptions and/or description of one or more areas does not contain enough detail. | Missing two descriptions and/or description of one or more areas does not contain enough detail. | Missing one description or description of one area does not contain enough detail. | Descriptions of Who/What/Why/When are detailed and complete. | |||||
| QUESTION 1 | MISSING (0%) | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | |||||
| 10 pts | Description of values are missing. | Description of some values are missing. | Description of 5 different values is included, but is a repeating of case facts only or is unclear or incomplete. | Description of 5 different values is somewhat clear and somewhat explains how values contribute to the organization's success but does not completely explain how each value contributes to the organization's success. | Description of 5 different values is clear, concise, and completely explains how each value contributes to the organization's success. | |||||
| QUESTION 2 | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | ||||||
| 10 pts | Description of whether Calveta's approach offers a competitive advantage AND the importance of training & development to growth is missing. | Description of whether Calveta's approach offers a competitive advantage OR the importance of training & development to growth is missing. | Description of whether Calveta's approach offers a competitive advantage and the importance of training & development to growth is included, but is a repeating of case facts only or is unclear or incomplete. | Description of whether Calveta's approach offers a competitive advantage and the importance of training & development to growth are somewhat clear, but not complete. | Description of whether Calveta's approach offers a competitive advantage and the importance of training & development to growth is clear, concise, complete and goes beyond just stating case facts. | |||||
| QUESTION 3 | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | ||||||
| 10 pts | Description of 3 levels of organizational culture are missing. | Description of some levels of organizational culture are missing. | Description of 3 levels of organizational culture is included, but is defining them only or does not illustrate each level with Calveta's culture. | Description of 3 levels of organizational culture is somewhat clear and somewhat illustrates each level with Calveta's culture but does not completely illustrate each level of organizational culture with Calveta's culture. | Description of 3 levels of organizational culture is clear, concise, and completely illustrates each level of organizational culture with Calveta's culture. | |||||
| QUESTION 4 | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | ||||||
| 10 pts | Description of 3 characteristics of positive organizational culture are missing. | Description of some characteristics of positive organizational culture are missing. | Description of 3 characteristics of positive organizational culture is included, but is defining them only or does not illustrate each characteristic with Calveta's culture. | Description of 3 characteristics of positive organizational culture is somewhat clear and somewhat illustrates Calveta's culture but does not completely illustrate each characteristic of positive organizational culture with Calveta's culture. | Description of 3 characteristics of positive organizational culture is clear, concise, and completely illustrates each characteristic with Calveta's culture. | |||||
| GRAMMAR/TYPOS/QUALITY | WEAK (55%) | ACCEPTABLE (70%) | GOOD (85%) | EXCELLENT (100%) | ||||||
| 2 pts | Missing all parts of 100% criteria. Errors in grammar and syntax detract from the meaning of passages. | Missing three parts of the 100% criteria. Many errors in grammar and syntax. | Missing two parts of the 100% criteria. Quite a few errors in grammar and syntax. | Missing one part of the 100% criteria. Several errors in grammar and syntax. | Written clearly and concisely. Within word count limit of 500 words on each question. Minimal errors in grammar and syntax. | |||||
| TOTAL | 50 pts | |||||||||
Student Number: ______________________
