The new automated CEO: Is it possible that managers can be replaced by technology?

profilebonolom1104
IndividualassignmentThenewautomatedCEO.docx

Individual assignment CCMM 516 2019

The new automated CEO: Is it possible that managers can be replaced by technology?

Is it Possible? Can it be done? According to the success of a new software interface called iCEO, the answer is yes.

iCEO, the product of the Workable Futures Initiative at the Institute for the Future — an independent, non-profit research organization in Silicon Valley, California, is a virtual management system that automates complex work by dividing it into small individual tasks, according to the Harvard Business Review. The system then assigns these tasks to workers using multiple software platforms, such as oDesk, Uber, email and text messaging, essentially creating "drag-and-drop virtual assembly lines," that are controlled from a dashboard.

In a trial run of iCEO, the system was used to oversee the preparation of a 124-page report for a Fortune 50 company. Researchers spent a few hours plugging in the parameters of the project and then let the system work. iCEO executed the project without the need for intervention from the researchers, even to check the quality of individual components of the report. The end result amazed the researchers.

"The research alone for such a paper would typically take several weeks to complete; with iCEO, the research only took three days. And while creating the full report through a traditional management-employee structure would probably require months to complete, iCEO did it in just weeks," Devin Fidler, who heads the Workable Futures Initiative, wrote in HBR.

iCEO has also been used in pilot programs for assignments in sales, quality assurance and hiring, but researchers think additional applications are possible.

Although many people believe the strategic and creative demands of CEOs and project managers cannot be translated into automated processes, the same argument was once put forth regarding detailed craft work, Mr. Fidler points out. During the Industrial Revolution, by breaking down this work into discrete steps, the automation of craftsmanship became standard.

While management comes with information-intensive responsibilities, software interfaces are making it increasingly easier for computers to route and track work projects.

World-renowned leaders such as Bill Gates and Larry Summers have warned against automated managers and digital systems for their potential to disrupt jobs. Traditionally, the jobs affected by automation — specifically by robotics — namely affected those in blue collar and service working jobs while executives remained immune. Now, Mr. Fidler argues the same cost/analysis benefit performed by shareholders against assembly line works and office managers will soon be applied to executives and their high salaries.

Your Brief.

Your CEO (Fast moving consumer goods) recently stumbled across this article and asked you to intensive research on the topic. Please consider the following topics and answer your him in an academic managerial report format. (NB no more than a 1500 words, it can be less). Show and apply your literature study. Please refer to you sources according to the Harvard method throughout your assignment.

The topics that you should address are:

The differences between flat organizations and traditional bureaucratic hierarchies (NB See also holocracies), the possibility that information technology can eliminate the middle manager positions. Consider also the management, organization, and technology issues should they decide to move from a traditional bureaucracy to a flatter organization. Lastly is it possible that a manager can be replaced by technology and if it can be done, how could it be done?

Structure your answers well.

A management report layout typically has the following structure:

Cover page (basically your title, name and student number as well as an indication that this is an individual assignment)

Executive summary (summarizes the total document in approximately 1 page

Table of contents

Introduction

Literature study (will consist of various headings including the references to each statement as per NWU study guide obtainable at

https://libguides.nwu.ac.za/harvard-referencing

Empirical study (In this case your application of the literature to the given scenario)

Conclusions and recommendations

Bibliography/Reference list

Annexures

See also assignment guide

http://library.nwu.ac.za/sites/library.nwu.ac.za/files/files/documents/report-writing.pdf

NB please be aware of the plagiarism rules. No plagiarism will be tolerated.

All of the following are considered plagiarism:

· turning in someone else's work as your own

· copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit

· failing to put a quotation in quotation marks

· giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

· changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit

· copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not

Your assignment will be marked accordingly the following guide:

CRITERIA FOR MARKING Pg. Dip-ASSIGNMENTS

1

Meeting the objectives of the assignment The extent to which:

60

*1.1

the assignment was understood and answered comprehensively

10

*1.2

independent (own) thought is reflected

10

1.3

insight in the topic was demonstrated

10

1.4

logical, systematic thought and reasoning is demonstrated

10

1.5

quality research (literature study and / or empirical work) was done

10

1.6

conclusions are logic, meaningful and substantiated

10

2

Presentation and technical aspects

The extent to which:

30

2.1

the content shows a logical and integrated development and forms a balanced holistic whole

15

2.2

the executive summary reflects the content comprehensively and meaningfully

5

2.3

the table of contents, references and list of sources are noted correctly

5

2.4

the style and language (grammar) meet the requirements

5

3

General quality rating

10

Evaluator’s general evaluation mark of the assignment’s quality - taking into consideration the above and other factors

TOTAL

100

*Low marks for 1.1 and 1.2 will probably jeopardise obtaining a pass mark.

COMMENTS: