Final exam!

profileHifriends
Individualallocationoftimebetweenleisureandmarketproduction1.pptx

Individual allocation of time between leisure and market labour

I Notation for leisure – market labour tradeoff

Total time = T

Time taken as leisure = l

Time spent in market labour = T – l, market wage rate per unit of time = w

Leisure is a “good”, market labour is a bad.

Why spend time in market labour? To acquire income to purchase market-produced goods, C, with price per unit = p

Opportunity cost of a unit of leisure, in terms of market-produced good?

Quantity of C must be given up to obtain one more unit of leisure is w/p

Monetary cost of reducing market labour by one unit is w.

Amount of C that can be purchased by one unit of market labour = w/p

II Numerical example

Consider time measured in hours

Let T = 16 per day w = $20 per hour p = $10

Then if all time spent in market labour income = $320; this can be used to purchase C = 32

Opportunity cost of a unit of leisure = $20/$10 = 2 units of C

NOTE: scale on vertical axis is adjusted to make change in constraint more clear.

C

32

slope = -2 A: on initial budget line where MRS of C for l = -2

B: on budget line after wage decrease where MRS of C for l =

new “real price” of unit of leisure = -15/10 = -3/2

A (initial choice)

D D: substitution effect of decrease in wage rate on indifference curve through A where

B MRS of C for A =-3/2

(choice after w )

Leisure in hours

l at A 16

(total time T)

Lower intercept on vertical axis = 240, reflects 25% decrease in market wage.

Effects of decline in wage rate

Suppose now that w falls from $20/hr to $15/hr.

This will not affect the maximum time available for leisure (16 hrs), but will reduce the maximum income if all time is spent in market labour: spending all 16 hrs in the market will now generate 25% less income, so wT = 16x15 = 240 rather than 320.

Substitution effect: Move from A-D means l increases and C decreases

Income effect: move from D-B means both l and C decrease.

Overall effect on market labour? Given preferences, income effect is larger (in absolute value) than Substitution effect, so leisure falls and market labour increases. With different preferences, could have increased.