History Essay

profilealisong
indigenousexperiencept1frontier.pptx

ppt/presentation.xml

ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slides/slide1.xml

Indigenous experience in Colonial Latin America part 1 Semi- and non-sedentary peoples and the “frontier”

ppt/slides/slide2.xml

For my Section 1 students, we forgot one sedentary empire (the real El Dorado!) But to be fair, many people forget about this one (though they shouldn’t!)

ppt/slides/slide3.xml

The Muisca were a sedentary empire occupying much of modern Colombia (Viceroyalty of Nueva Granada) Gonzalo Jiménez de Quesada encounters the Muisca after looking for a land route to Peru in 1537 Natives there sacrificed gold objects and jewels (which they didn’t have much of). Quesada thought he found El Dorado. The Muisca had two leaders: the Zipa of the south and the Zaque of the North. Quesada and his 800 men make alliances and take down enemy leaders one by one in 1537. They install a puppet ruler Aquiminzaque Aquiminzaque rebels (like Manco Capac of the Inca!) but is later executed in 1540 as the last Muisca ruler

ppt/slides/slide4.xml

This is probably how you think of the Maya (Classic Era Maya, 200 – 900 AD)

ppt/slides/slide5.xml

But after ~900 AD, Mayans became semi-sedentary slash-and burn farmers in small villages “El Castillo” in Tulum (bottom right), was the largest structure still standing when Spaniards got there. The famous large pyramids and palaces were mostly gone and with them, their former sedentary life. The Maya became semi- sedentaries by the time Spanish showed up. This wasn’t a “collapse” or regression. This was a response to environmental limits of Central American rainforests. The semi- sendentary character of Maya society in the colonial period meant conquest would not be easy or rewarding.

ppt/slides/slide6.xml

This scene from the comic Aztec Empire shows Gonzalo Guerrero (a stranded Spaniard) who becomes culturally Maya, becomes a military commander and marries a Maya noble woman. Note their relatively modest house compared to Aztec palaces

ppt/slides/slide7.xml

The battle of Potonchan , between Cortés and the Maya (before he went to conquer the Aztecs) in 1519 illustrates what war was like against the Maya (again credit to the web comic Aztec Empire , episode 3)

ppt/slides/slide8.xml

Maya weapons, of course, can still do damage (always wear a helmet!)

ppt/slides/slide9.xml

800 Maya dead, and 2 of Cortés’ men dead. Spaniards can defeat Maya armies on an open field. But the rest of the Maya will flee to the forest and there isn’t much loot to plunder. Read this Spanish account below (again, quoted from Aztec Empire )

ppt/slides/slide10.xml

Cortés captured the leaders of Potonchan but they had little to give, except for info on a rich empire up north (Aztecs)

ppt/slides/slide11.xml

The ransom from the captured Maya lords is disappointing to Cortés and his men

ppt/slides/slide12.xml

The conquistadors are more interested in the slave girls that are offered to them by the Maya (One of whom would be the famous Malinche or Malinalli , a Mexican Nahua slave, how did she get there? 🤔)

ppt/slides/slide13.xml

After the conquest of the Aztecs in 1521, Conquistadors return to Guatemala… and don’t accomplish much Pedro de Alvarado captures the Kiche Mayan capital in 1524, but other towns later are just abandoned when conquistadors conquer them ( always with the help of allies). Mayans are small-scale semi-sedentary mobile farmers used to jungle life. They can flee into the rainforest when Spaniards get to be too much. Like other semi- sedentaries they are de-centralized: they are not empires, they don’t have universal rulers, and have to be conquered one by one As soon as news of Peru gets out, everyone forgets about Yucatan, Guatemala, etc. and the Maya. Alvarado leaves for Ecuador (and just sells his weapons to other conquistadors when he gets there). Why?

ppt/slides/slide14.xml

Francisco de Montejo is the only adelantado who stays… and doesn’t conquer Yucatán until 1546(!) Almost two decades! Even then, the Maya of the Petén Basin are independent… until 1697! Mayan populations are (relatively!) small, rebellious, and don’t produce resources that Spaniards want. Unpopular or unlucky conquistadors get encomiendas in the southern Mayan lands. Runaway slaves flee into the Central American jungles, along with renegade Mayans. This is not a place Spaniards want to be and there are few Europeans outside of Spanish cities like Mérida. Basically the Maya are never totally “conquered” though many would be heavily influenced by Spanish culture.

ppt/slides/slide15.xml

Mayan Guatemala and Central America (like Brazil, Caribbean, and other semi-sedentary places until plantations get started) becomes an under-settled periphery that Spaniards don’t want to go to The famous conquistador and chronicler of the conquest, Bernal Díaz del Castillo (pictured), gets a poor Maya encomienda in Guatemala because Cortés was suspicious of his connections to the gov. of Cuba. Díaz complains about it til the end. Mayans are technically Christian as a result of conquest, so they can’t even be enslaved (though they were often treated like slaves!) Guatemala wouldn’t produce valuable exports until independence in the 1850s when the cochineal and coffee industry took off.

ppt/slides/slide16.xml

The non-sedentary North of Mexico is far worse for Spaniards The Aztecs barely have any gold, but the northern deserts are full of silver… and hostile natives. Miners heading to the north are faced with non-sedentary Chichimec nations determined to keep Spaniards out. This leads to the Mixtón war of 1540-42, one of the bloodiest colonial wars. Otherwise gentlemanly Viceroy Antonio de Mendoza rips apart women and children and is secretly investigated as a result. Sedentary Aztec and Tlaxcallan allies help Spaniards, not their fellow “Indians” the non-sedentary Chichimecs . “victory” in the Mixtón only leads to a much longer war in the north: the Chichimeca war of 1550 – 1590. This is only “won” through peace and negotiation Non- sedentaries in the north of Mexico and American southwest would always be nearly impossible to fully conquer and mold into obedient subjects. Why?

ppt/slides/slide17.xml

The Southwest US (part of New Spain at the time!) shows some promise. For a little while. A few violent Spanish expeditions (in part searching for the mythical 7 Cities of Cíbola ) into the southwest occurred in the 16 th century. Not much until the infamous Juan de Oñate formally possesses New Mexico for Spain in 1598. Oñate is controversial to this day for his massacres and his orders to have the foot cut off of every Puebloan man who opposed him. The towns and multi-storied apartments of the Puebloans, though small by Aztec and Inca standards, were the closest things to Mexican Aztec cities in North America. Hence why they called it New Mexico .

ppt/slides/slide18.xml

But “New Mexico” would not be another Mexico, in either wealth or population The semi-sedentary Pueblo Indians could not produce as much tribute and labor as larger Mexican and Aztec populations The Puebloans are also more rebellious and less tolerant of Spanish demands than Mexican Indians: The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 (led by Popé , pictured) killed or expelled all Spaniards in the area due to their harsh treatment of the Puebloans. Spaniards would only “reconquer” NM 12 years later by promising to be nice and offering to help defend them from Apache and Comanche raids. Like Guatemala/C. America, Caribbean, early Brazil, etc. the Southwest was sparsely colonized by Spaniards

ppt/slides/slide19.xml

Florida is another “dud” for the Spanish Spaniards since Columbus knew about La Florida (originally all the east coast of the current USA). So why didn’t they “colonize” it until 1564? Powerful, aggressive, semi-sedentary natives killed all conquest expeditions until 1564. Boricuas might remember Juan Ponce de León who tried to conquer Florida and was killed by Colusa Indians. Spaniards only get colonization going when the French settle Florida in 1564. Then adelantado Pedro Menéndez de Ávila launches an expedition against them. He founds St. Augustine which never becomes much more than a fort. Ávila and other settlers mostly avoid Indians and focus more on fighting the French.

ppt/slides/slide20.xml

Sedentary mound-building Mississippians inhabited parts of Florida for centuries But by the time Spaniards got there, Florida, like most of the east coast, was home to several semi-sedentary nations. The Creek/Yamasee emerged as one of the most powerful of them Unable to subdue the natives, Spaniards establish missions and presidios (churches and forts) to convert them. As with most other semi and non- sedentaries in N. America, this doesn’t work very well. Diseases brought by Europeans, and slave-raiding by British colonists in the Carolinas (assisted by willing Creek allies) drove many of these nations to extinction by the 1700s (Sound familiar? Think, across the Caribbean pond…)

ppt/slides/slide21.xml

Refugees from these decimated nations along with runaway slaves formed the Seminole nation in the 18 th C. Like with many previous Indian nations in Florida, the Spanish could never, and often didn’t even bother trying to, keep the Seminoles under control. They did not have much settlement or power in La Florida. It was English colonists, and later the United States, who fought more often with Seminoles. When the Spanish left Florida and the USA took over (1821), the Seminoles were fighting a war against the independent USA. As with several other Indian nations, the Seminole outlasted Spanish rule and were not defeated/conquered until after the independence era.

ppt/slides/slide22.xml

The famous Spanish mission system stretches from Florida to California (and S. America) Missions existed as a way to convert (and subdue) more rebellious and difficult to conquer semi and non-sedentary natives (and to give jobs to friars who missed out on the Mexican and Peruvian jackpot) Intact powerful nations virtually never join the missions (the Comanches would never have lived in them!). It’s mostly Natives whose communities have declined and have nowhere to go. Once stuck in missions, some Natives become tired of the constant labor and rebelled. Diseases accelerated rapidly in the crowded conditions and claimed the lives of thousands. Missions were (in)famously responsible for bringing about the near-genocide of California Indians under the watch of Fr. Junípero Serra (1713-1785).

ppt/slides/slide23.xml

A typical Spanish mission

ppt/slides/slide24.xml

Around the same time another powerful Indian nation forms: the Comanches In the 1700s, after mastering horse riding (with horses rustled from Europeans) the buffalo hunting non-sedentary Comanches moved into the Southwest and plains, conquering other Natives (esp. Apaches, their mortal enemies) and Spanish settlements. They carved out a vast territory known as the Comanchería including parts of Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Utah. The farming semi-sedentary people and Spanish colonists there are subjected and incorporated into the Comanchería . Some historians have said it functioned like a virtual empire. Comanches launch raids into northern Mexico even after Mexico gains independence. Colonial New Spain and later Mexico are powerless to stop them. The damage from the raids makes it easier for USA to defeat Mexico in the Mexican American war (1846-1848)

ppt/slides/slide25.xml

The Comanchería only falls when the USA comes in with more powerful guns and large numbers of settlers Revolvers, repeating rifles, and approx. 600k Yankee settlers eventually overpower the 8k Comanches in 1875 after decades of war with USA. The final defeat of the Comanches should not obscure the fact that they maintained independence and dominated European colonies and American nations for a century and a half. Ditto for the Apaches. Their success was possible partly because they were not sedentary and could overpower more technologically advanced armies through speed, mobility, and stealth.

ppt/slides/slide26.xml

The Mapuches were like the Comanche of South America Like the Comanche (and Seminoles), the Mapuche were different groups that united in the colonial period. And like the Comanche, the Mapuche overpowered and defeated Spanish colonists for centuries They are successful resisting the Inca and later the earliest Spanish conquistadors of Chile. Pedro de Valdivia founds Santiago (capital of Chile) in 1541, but Mapuches destroy the city later that year.

ppt/slides/slide27.xml

Like the Comanche, the Mapuche use Spanish horses and steel to turn the tables Their mobility on horseback and their metal weapons made from melted down Spanish steel prevents thorough Spanish colonization of the Southern Cone (Río de la Plata). The founding of Buenos Aires is delayed until 1580, after Mapuches destroyed the first settlement. The Mapuche emerge victorious after a century-long war ending in the 1650s, the Auraco War, stopping Spanish colonization. The cause of the war was Spanish attempting to enslave Mapuche to make them mine gold. Mapuche were unwilling to work for Spanish colonists. Spain: It’s [been] 3 centuries [that] I fight you. Die Please. Mapuches : Never! Spain: Ok, you won.

ppt/slides/slide28.xml

Like with the Comanches, only the advanced gun technology and superior numbers of independent nations defeated the Mapuches in the 19 th c. The “Conquest of the Desert” launched by the modern nations of Argentina and Chile finally did what the Spanish could never do and subdued the Mapuche in the 1880s. The campaign was very similar to US wars against the very similar Comanches and Plains Indians also in the late 1800s. These were genocidal wars that resulted in Natives being sent to reservations. Regions with similar Indians would have similar histories

ppt/slides/slide29.xml

And like the Comanche and others we’ve studied, the Mapuche are still around.

ppt/slides/slide30.xml

Paraguay takes a more peaceful turn, largely because Spaniards forget about it After the founding of Asunción in 1537 (modern capital of Paraguay),the small population of conquistadors attempt to divide the semi-sed. Guaraní into encomiendas . But in the 1550s and 1560s, Native rebellions prevent this. Paraguay has very little to produce for the colonial economy. With no resources to exploit, there is little reason to exploit Guaraní Natives. Most of the Spanish colonists instead integrate into indigenous society, producing mestizo children who are Catholic but speak Guaraní (to this day Guaraní is widely spoken there). Jesuits founded a large chain of missions stretching from Paraguay into Brazil (more on this later) which are more harmonious than CA and SW missions.

ppt/slides/slide31.xml

Forgotten (at first!) Brazil starts out like Paraguay Portugal largely ignored Brazil until the sugar and slave economy really got rolling in the 1600s. The few Portuguese colonists integrate into native Tupí society, like Caramuru (Diego Correia), who learns the local language and marries an indigenous woman.

ppt/slides/slide32.xml

But when a trading, brazilwood economy moves towards plantations and mining, indigenous slavery increases Africans were not a first choice for slave labor. They were expensive to ship. Indigenous people were “cheaper” because they were more close-by. São Vicente is the first town in Brazil that succeeds partly because of the Indian slave trade. Indigenous people were more prone to running away (and dying) and harder to accustom to work. Like in the Caribbean, the coastal natives ( Tupi ) become virtually extinct in decades. Bandeirantes , Brazilian slave-hunters, head deep in the Amazon to capture the inland jungle natives ( Tapuia , who survive to this day)

ppt/slides/slide33.xml

Portuguese slavery triggers the formation of Native confederations who fight back Tupi nations of Brazil unite as the Tamoio confederation. Ultimately, they are put down not through war, but through peace treaties with Jesuits, under the condition that they live in missions and accept Christianity.

ppt/slides/slide34.xml

As elsewhere, missions in Brazil and Paraguay offer shelter and protection from slavery and rival Indians.. But at a price Jesuit friars found missions ( reducões ) throughout Brazil, Paraguay, and even Argentina, which take in Tupi -Guaraní natives. These mission Indians cannot (legally!) be enslaved and missions provide protection from enemies. The missions/ reducões also require Indians to cut their hair, give up their culture, become Christian, and adopt strict sex restrictions and segregation. Bandeirantes raid the missions for slaves at first, but the Jesuit friars organize native militias that fight back. These are much more successful than the missions in CA and the American SW. The population in South American missions actually grows. Considered one of the shining points of European-indigenous relations, it ends when the Jesuits are expelled in 1768

ppt/slides/slide35.xml

The decline and expulsion of the Jesuits in 1768 leaves Brazilian and Paraguayan Natives vulnerable to slavery and exploitation once more As seen in the movie The Mission , taking place in Paraguay in the 1750s when the missions were falling apart (I wish we could’ve watched it in class!)

ppt/slides/slide36.xml

We’ve covered the (colonial Spanish) history of the so-called “American frontier” Historian Frederick Jackson Turner claimed in 1893 that the creativity, strength, and courage needed to defeat Indians, Spaniards, and Mexicans on the frontier spurred US democracy and made America great. This has been a tremendously influential idea in American society. US culture has always idolized “the wild frontier”

ppt/slides/slide37.xml

But one nation’s “frontier” is another nation’s homeland The frontier thesis makes it seem like the people we’ve studied so far in this lecture were just obstacles to US expansion. Bowling pins for Yankees to knock down. To Comanches, Apaches, Puebloans, etc. however, the frontier was their home and the center of their world. It was a dynamic, changing area where different nations battled for power, and the USA takeover was never certain South America had a very similar frontier with the Mapuches , but why don’t people think that the Mapuche wars made Chile and Argentina great? The American frontier is not as unique as one might think.

ppt/slides/slide38.xml

Thinking of the frontier as a playground for European/”white” expansion also obscures one fact: Europeans were never in control until after the end of colonialism! Rather than being frontiers, these were centers of independent, powerful Indian nations. Outside of Mexico (central New Spain) and Peru, the sedentary heartlands, Spain had little effective control. Most Spanish “colonies” were a few towns and cities in a sea of Indian nations. Río de la Plata was basically Santiago (Chile), Buenos Aires, and Montevideo and surrounding hamlets. A better way to think of these areas is as peripheries , with Mexico and Peru being the cores.

ppt/slides/slide39.xml

But why would Iberians even be in a “peripheral” area anyway? Precious metal deposits, e.g. Northern Mexico (silver mines, successfully exploited), Río de la Plata (some gold deposits, not much success against the Mapuche though) Growing food for the cores (e.g. Río de la Plata, Argentina and Chile had good land for ranching and farming, though Mapuche prevented a lot of this) Rest stops and shipping areas for travelers and commerce going to Spain (Caribbean) Later: sugar and valuable crop plantations (Caribbean and Brazil) Perhaps most importantly: defending the cores from pirates, hostile natives, and other Europeans!

ppt/slides/slide40.xml

Spaniards only rushed to colonize Florida and California when other Europeans (Russians and French) were sending settlers there Pictured: Fort Ross, a Russian fort… in California!

ppt/slides/slide41.xml

The Portuguese too! São Vicente, the first real European-style town in Brazil, is only founded in 1532 when pirates and French threatened Brazil. It later becomes a market for indigenous slaves.

ppt/slides/slide42.xml

Few Iberians wanted to be in the peripheries, those who end up there are often desperate for success or opportunity Most of the settlers there were those who missed out on the big prizes of Mexico, Peru, and (for the Portuguese) Africa and India. Or low-ranking officials who couldn’t get better jobs in the cores. Cortés’ failed rival Pánfilo de Narváez went on a disastrous conquest expedition to Florida in 1528 (which took his life). Do you really think he would have gone to hostile Florida if he would have conquered Mexico instead of Cortés? Do you think Fr. Junípero Serra would have gone to far-flung California if he would have become Bishop of Mexico?

ppt/slides/slide43.xml

Even so, Spanish/Euro presence, much less “control” in many of these places was minimal When looking at maps like these remember that they only represent European claims to land. Spanish America north of Mexico and South of Peru was home to only a few thousand settlers. The territory claimed by France was vast, but even less settled than Spanish America.

ppt/slides/slide44.xml

So what can we say about general experiences of non and semi-sedentary indigenous people on the colonial periphery? Semi- sedentaries often greet Iberians semi-peacefully ( Taínos , indigenous Paraguayans and Brazilians), sometimes not (Puebloans, Mapuches * ) Some Iberians marry into indigenous society at first Usually the violence starts when Iberians start trying to take slaves. Almost all Natives on the periphery are subject to slavery ( Not the Maya though ). Non- sedentaries (always a minority, most Natives practiced some agriculture) are hostile from the beginning and fight to the end. Many semi- sed.s , like the Maya, preserve their culture by staying away from the small numbers of colonists. Others, like the Taíno who have limited escape options, go nearly extinct. * Mapuches grow some crops, but their mobility and other patterns resemble non- sedentaries

ppt/slides/slide45.xml

Ironically, Iberian colonialism causes the growth of powerful Native leagues, unions, and confedrations on the frontiers Native groups that were once divided or enemies join together against Iberian conquerors or slave raiders, sometimes joining runaway black slaves ( cimarrones , where we get the word Seminole from). Examples we’ve covered: Comanches, Mapuches , Seminoles, Tamoios . None of these people existed as such or were united before the colonial period.

ppt/slides/slide46.xml

Disease and slavery almost completely killed off Indians living in the coastal areas of the periphery. The choices for such natives were assimilation, running away, or mission life When their societies died out, surviving Indians of the Caribbean, California, coastal Brazil and elsewhere either joined still-free Indian nations inland or… … they assimilated into European society (like the young man in the picture taken from an Indian school in the USA, different place/time but same concept), or… … they lived in missions where they had to assimilate anyway but retained some separation from colonial society (and indigenous enemies)

ppt/slides/slide47.xml

But many non and semi sedentaries would never be conquered until independence in the 1800s. The USA and the new Latin American nations did what colonial powers couldn’t… with the help of more powerful guns and larger populations. In general, the non- and semi- sedentaries resisted conquest and acculturation/assimilation far longer than sedentaries .

ppt/slides/slide48.xml

Even still, many of these peoples survive today, some living “normal” lives as citizens in modern nations

ppt/slides/slide49.xml

And some, living a lot like their ancestors, resist to this day

ppt/presProps.xml

ppt/viewProps.xml

ppt/theme/theme1.xml

ppt/tableStyles.xml

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml

Click to edit Master title style 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml

3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#› “ ”

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#› “ ”

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout15.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout16.xml

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3/30/2020 ‹#›

ppt/media/image1.png

ppt/media/image2.png

ppt/media/image3.png

ppt/media/image4.png

ppt/media/image5.png

ppt/media/image6.png

ppt/media/image7.png

ppt/media/image8.png

ppt/media/image9.png

ppt/media/image10.png

ppt/media/image11.png

ppt/media/image12.png

ppt/media/image13.png

ppt/media/image14.png

ppt/media/image15.png

ppt/media/image16.png

ppt/media/image17.png

ppt/media/image18.png

ppt/media/image19.png

ppt/media/image20.png

ppt/media/image21.png

ppt/media/image22.png

ppt/media/image23.png

ppt/media/image24.png

ppt/media/image25.png

ppt/media/image26.png

ppt/media/image27.png

ppt/media/image28.png

ppt/media/image29.png

ppt/media/image30.png

ppt/media/image31.png

ppt/media/image32.jpg

ppt/media/image33.png

ppt/media/image34.png

ppt/media/image35.png

ppt/media/image36.png

ppt/media/image37.png

ppt/media/image38.png

ppt/media/image39.png

ppt/media/image40.png

ppt/media/image41.png

ppt/media/image42.png

ppt/media/image43.png

ppt/media/image44.png

ppt/media/image45.png

ppt/media/image46.png

ppt/media/image47.png

ppt/media/image48.png

ppt/media/image49.png

ppt/media/image50.png

ppt/media/image51.png

ppt/media/image52.png

ppt/media/image53.png

ppt/media/image54.png

ppt/media/image55.jpeg

ppt/media/image56.png

ppt/media/image57.png

ppt/media/image58.png

ppt/media/image59.png

ppt/media/image60.png

ppt/media/image61.png

ppt/media/image62.png

ppt/media/image63.png

ppt/media/image64.png

ppt/media/image65.png

ppt/media/image66.png

ppt/changesInfos/changesInfo1.xml

ppt/revisionInfo.xml

docProps/core.xml

Indigenous experience in Colonial Latin America part 1 Celso A. Mendoza Celso A. Mendoza 1 2020-03-31T00:49:12Z 2020-03-31T08:03:14Z

docProps/app.xml

434 4147 Microsoft Office PowerPoint Widescreen 161 49 0 0 0 false Fonts Used 4 Theme 1 Slide Titles 49 Arial Trebuchet MS Wingdings Wingdings 3 Facet Indigenous experience in Colonial Latin America part 1 For my Section 1 students, we forgot one sedentary empire (the real El Dorado!) The Muisca were a sedentary empire occupying much of modern Colombia (Viceroyalty of Nueva Granada) This is probably how you think of the Maya (Classic Era Maya, 200 – 900 AD) But after ~900 AD, Mayans became semi-sedentary slash-and burn farmers in small villages This scene from the comic Aztec Empire shows Gonzalo Guerrero (a stranded Spaniard) who becomes culturally Maya, becomes a military commander and marries a Maya noble woman. Note their relatively modest house compared to Aztec palaces The battle of Potonchan, between Cortés and the Maya (before he went to conquer the Aztecs) in 1519 illustrates what war was like against the Maya (again credit to the web comic Aztec Empire, episode 3) Maya weapons, of course, can still do damage (always wear a helmet!) 800 Maya dead, and 2 of Cortés’ men dead. Spaniards can defeat Maya armies on an open field. But the rest of the Maya will flee to the forest and there isn’t much loot to plunder. Read this Spanish account below (again, quoted from Aztec Empire) Cortés captured the leaders of Potonchan but they had little to give, except for info on a rich empire up north (Aztecs) The ransom from the captured Maya lords is disappointing to Cortés and his men The conquistadors are more interested in the slave girls that are offered to them by the Maya (One of whom would be the famous Malinche or Malinalli, a Mexican Nahua slave, how did she get there? 🤔) After the conquest of the Aztecs in 1521, Conquistadors return to Guatemala… and don’t accomplish much Francisco de Montejo is the only adelantado who stays… and doesn’t conquer Yucatán until 1546(!) Almost two decades! Mayan Guatemala and Central America (like Brazil, Caribbean, and other semi-sedentary places until plantations get started) becomes an under-settled periphery that Spaniards don’t want to go to The non-sedentary North of Mexico is far worse for Spaniards The Southwest US (part of New Spain at the time!) shows some promise. For a little while. But “New Mexico” would not be another Mexico, in either wealth or population Florida is another “dud” for the Spanish Sedentary mound-building Mississippians inhabited parts of Florida for centuries Refugees from these decimated nations along with runaway slaves formed the Seminole nation in the 18th C. The famous Spanish mission system stretches from Florida to California (and S. America) A typical Spanish mission Around the same time another powerful Indian nation forms: the Comanches The Comanchería only falls when the USA comes in with more powerful guns and large numbers of settlers The Mapuches were like the Comanche of South America Like the Comanche, the Mapuche use Spanish horses and steel to turn the tables Like with the Comanches, only the advanced gun technology and superior numbers of independent nations defeated the Mapuches in the 19th c. And like the Comanche and others we’ve studied, the Mapuche are still around. Paraguay takes a more peaceful turn, largely because Spaniards forget about it Forgotten (at first!) Brazil starts out like Paraguay But when a trading, brazilwood economy moves towards plantations and mining, indigenous slavery increases Portuguese slavery triggers the formation of Native confederations who fight back As elsewhere, missions in Brazil and Paraguay offer shelter and protection from slavery and rival Indians.. But at a price The decline and expulsion of the Jesuits in 1768 leaves Brazilian and Paraguayan Natives vulnerable to slavery and exploitation once more We’ve covered the (colonial Spanish) history of the so-called “American frontier” But one nation’s “frontier” is another nation’s homeland Thinking of the frontier as a playground for European/”white” expansion also obscures one fact: But why would Iberians even be in a “peripheral” area anyway? Spaniards only rushed to colonize Florida and California when other Europeans (Russians and French) were sending settlers there The Portuguese too! Few Iberians wanted to be in the peripheries, those who end up there are often desperate for success or opportunity Even so, Spanish/Euro presence, much less “control” in many of these places was minimal So what can we say about general experiences of non and semi-sedentary indigenous people on the colonial periphery? Ironically, Iberian colonialism causes the growth of powerful Native leagues, unions, and confedrations on the frontiers Disease and slavery almost completely killed off Indians living in the coastal areas of the periphery. The choices for such natives were assimilation, running away, or mission life But many non and semi sedentaries would never be conquered until independence in the 1800s. The USA and the new Latin American nations did what colonial powers couldn’t… with the help of more powerful guns and larger populations. In general, the non- and semi-sedentaries resisted conquest and acculturation/assimilation far longer than sedentaries. Even still, many of these peoples survive today, some living “normal” lives as citizens in modern nations And some, living a lot like their ancestors, resist to this day false false false 16.0000

_rels/.rels

ppt/_rels/presentation.xml.rels

ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide24.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide25.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide26.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide27.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide28.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide29.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide30.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide31.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide32.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide33.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide34.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide35.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide36.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide37.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide38.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide39.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide40.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide41.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide42.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide43.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide44.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide45.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide46.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide47.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide48.xml.rels

ppt/slides/_rels/slide49.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout15.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout16.xml.rels

[Content_Types].xml