Planning Task

profileXWBusinessmail
Implementinginstrucation.pptx

Implementing instrucation

I – Implementing Instruction

Providing access to the general curriculum does not mean that students will automatically be able to do everything that a task, element, or standard requires.

WE STILL

MUST TEACH!

Implementing Instruction

Students must ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE in the task.

The goal is for students to have opportunities to use IEP objectives

embedded within the task.

The number and type of opportunities to use skills within a task may look different for each student.

Good Teaching Strategies

Good teaching strategies are needed in aligned tasks, and in functional activities.

Good teaching strategies are tailored to the student’s individual needs.

Good Teaching Strategies (continued)

Good teaching strategies include:

Structure of the task

Materials used

Technology access

Connection between the task and what the student is to learn based upon his/her needs

Behavior management / Reinforcement strategies

Task Structure

Structure within the task should include:

Student preparation

Teacher instruction

Student response

Feedback on performance

The structure for each task should stay the same, but the method and information presented should be tailored for each student.

Student Preparation

Makes a connection between the student, the task, the skill, and real-life

Materials and technology are introduced

This step gets the student ready to participate in the task

Providing Instruction and Student Response

Systems of prompts (time delay, least to most, most to least, etc.) provide a method thorough which the student receives instruction and support within the task

Type of prompting system will help determine the type of data to be collected within the task

Providing Instruction and Student Response

The prompting system used will depend upon:

Student functioning and needs

Skill to be taught

Task in which the skill is embedded

Materials to be utilized

Assistive Technology (AT)

Assistive Technology (AT) plays a MAJOR role in providing access to the tasks for students with significant cognitive disabilities

AT should be provided to give the student information needed to complete the task, and for the student to actively participate in the activities.

Assistive Technology (continued)

AAC devices (low to high tech) can provide access to communication.

Receptive and expressive

communication options

are required for

all students.

Assistive Technology (continued)

Student use of AT (including low tech, computer programs, AAC) must be taught across tasks, materials, and people.

The use of AT requires updating. As activities and vocabulary change, so should student materials, communication boards, AAC vocabulary, etc.

KEYBOARD

Feedback on Performance

Students should be provided with feedback on their performance of skills within and among tasks.

The feedback can take many different forms, and should take into consideration the student functioning level, activity, setting, and task.

Providing feedback allows the student to interact with other people and materials, as well as to be a part of their educational plan.

The Alignment Rubric

Instructional Methodology

Consistency is the KEY!

When providing instruction, be consistent in the way materials are presented, support is given, and feedback provided.

Students with significant cognitive disabilities need numerous attempts to learn a skill. They also need to focus on their participation within the task, and not try to decode new information given by the teacher.

When utilizing new materials, people, tasks, or settings (generalization), some aspects of instruction should remain constant to ensure that skills can be appropriately used.

Dimension Not Evident Minimal Satisfactory Exceptional

Instructional methodology

implemented during the

aligned activities

Instruction provided does

not require student

response. No information

about the instructional

activity is presented.

Consideration of student

needs in determining

instructional methodology

used is not evident.

Instruction provided

requires a minimal response

from the student, even

when considering the

student’s level of

functioning. Limited

information about the

instructional activity is

presented, even when

considering the student’s

level of functioning.

Consideration of student

needs/technology in

determining methodology

used is evident, but not

individualized for the

instruction presented.

Instruction provided

requires an active response

from the student which is

appropriate for the

student’s level of

functioning and for the

activity being presented.

Information about the

instructional activity is

presented in a manner that

allows the student to

understand the purpose of

the activity in their

educational plan.

Methodology utilized takes

into consideration student

needs/technology and

performance, and is

individualized for the

instruction presented.

Instruction provided

requires an active response

from the student which is

appropriate for the

student’s level of

functioning and for the

activity being presented.

Information about the

instructional activity is

presented in a manner that

allows the student to

understand the purpose of

the activity in their

educational plan.

Methodology utilized takes

into consideration student

needs/technology and

performance, and is

individualized to the

instruction presented.

Feedback on performance

is given to the student in a

timely manner, and student

response to interactions is

acknowledged and

considered for future

decisions.

Dimension

Not Evident

Minimal

Satisfactory

Exceptional

Instructional methodology implemented during the aligned activities

Instruction provided does not require student response. No information about the instructional activity is presented. Consideration of student needs in determining instructional methodology used is not evident.

Instruction provided requires a minimal response from the student, even when considering the student’s level of functioning. Limited information about the instructional activity is presented, even when considering the student’s level of functioning. Consideration of student needs/technology in determining methodology used is evident, but not individualized for the instruction presented.

Instruction provided requires an active response from the student which is appropriate for the student’s level of functioning and for the activity being presented. Information about the instructional activity is presented in a manner that allows the student to understand the purpose of the activity in their educational plan. Methodology utilized takes into consideration student needs/technology and performance, and is individualized for the instruction presented.

Instruction provided requires an active response from the student which is appropriate for the student’s level of functioning and for the activity being presented. Information about the instructional activity is presented in a manner that allows the student to understand the purpose of the activity in their educational plan. Methodology utilized takes into consideration student needs/technology and performance, and is individualized to the instruction presented. Feedback on performance is given to the student in a timely manner, and student response to interactions is acknowledged and considered for future decisions.