PACS 5

ImplementationPlan.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >PACS 5

CSIA 485 Project #5 Detailed Assignment Description

This assignment requires that you adapt the analysis done for P1/P2/P3/P4 to a new environment. Use your prior work, i.e. the recommendation memo and network diagram, to develop a high-level plan for implementing the required controls, changes, etc. to mitigate vulnerabilities and convergence issues in the new environment. You may need to do additional analysis to address issues specific to the second case study’s environment. Your high-level plan should include all the system development life cycle (SDLC) gates/decision points and all relevant tasks. Describe and relate the implementation solution to CIA and incorporate, people, processes and technology to this plan.

This is a combination of a paper and a detailed list of steps and resources that you would follow to implement and complete this project. Think about all of the actions, resources, and tasks that you would need in order to effect a successful implementation. These should also be included as part of the plan. The instructor may provide a template to use with this assignment. The minimum structure for this assignment is below:

· INTRODUCTION

· Purpose of Plan

· GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

· Business Goals and Objectives

· Project Goals and Objectives

· SCOPE

· Scope Definition

· Items Beyond Scope

· PROJECTED EXPENSES

· System Development Life Cycle/Schedule

· Milestones

· ASSUMPTIONS

· Project Assumptions

· CONSTRAINTS

· Project Constraints

· Critical Project Barriers

The Plan will be a minimum 5 page, double-spaced paper using Times New Roman 12 font and APA style formatting for citations and references. It will also include a minimum of 5 references. The Title/Cover page, illustrations (tables/charts/graphs), network diagram, and references are not part of the page count but are required for the assignment. The grading rubric provides additional details as to what should be included in the paper. Your instructor may provide an APA style template to use for this paper.

*** Make sure that you include in detail the steps you would take to secure the project.

PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC

Rubric Name: Project 5: Implementation Plan


Introduction	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Purpose / Goals and Objectives	10 points Expertly defines goals and objectives	8 points identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort	6 points identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a basic understanding of overall effort	3 points identifies goals and objectives in a manner where some aspects are missing or incomplete. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points does not identify goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort.
Scope of Security Issues	10 points Clearly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies material and document relationships.	8 points Basically describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies some material and document relationships.	6 points Weakly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Some synthesizing and application or applies material and document relationships.	3 points Little description and relating information security and other technology issues. Little synthesizing or application of material and document relationships. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No description or relationship of information security or other technology issues. Doesn’t synthesize or apply material and document relationships.
Project Expenses	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Costs Related to Security Effort/Solution	5 points Clearly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	4 points Basically identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	2 points Weakly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	1 point Little identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. May not link any costs to technologies identified. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. No link of any costs to technologies identified.
SDLC Schedule	10 points Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	8 points Basically Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	6 points Weakly Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	3 points Little synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
Solution Diagram and Illustration	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Use of Network diagram and illustrations	10 points Network diagram and accompanying illustration are strongly linked to proposed solution and content	8 points Network diagram and accompanying illustration are generally linked to proposed solution and content	6 points Network diagram and accompanying illustration are weakly linked to proposed solution and content	3 points Network diagram and accompanying illustration are haphazardly linked to proposed solution and content. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points Network diagram and accompanying illustration are not linked to proposed solution and content
Security Strategy	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Milestones	5 points Each defined milestone is directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	4 points Most milestones are related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	2 points Milestones are weakly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	1 point Milestone are haphazardly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	1 point No milestones are directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
Assumptions	10 points Clearly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers all three requirements.	8 points Basically identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least two of the three requirements.	6 points Weakly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least one of the requirements.	3 points Little identification of security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. May not cover one of the requirements. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points Doesn’t identify security solutions or assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. Doesn’t cover any of the three requirements.
Constraints	5 points Clearly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	4 points Basically describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	2 points Weakly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	1 point Little description of the linkage and constraints associated with solution. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No description of any linkage or constraints associated with solution
Timeline	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
SDLC Tasks	5 points Clear and detailed SDLC tasks that logically leads to the proposed solutions	4 points Basic SDLC tasks are provided that generally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized	2 points Weak and poorly detailed SDLC tasks are provided that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized	1 point Haphazard and poorly detailed SDLC tasks that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No SDLC tasks are provided that lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized No clear and defined tasks for each solution.
Prioritize Tasks	5 points Major tasks are clearly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.	4 points Major tasks basically prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.	2 points Major tasks weakly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.	1 point Few tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
Define Resources	5 points Clearly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	4 points Basically defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	2 points Weakly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	1 point Little defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)	0 points No defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
Finds and Applies Knowledge	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Use of Authoritative Sources	5 points Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No APA style errors in sources.	4 points Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.	3 points Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.	1 point May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May not have used APA style formatting.	0 points No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper.
Citation of Sources	5 points All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.	4 points All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.	2 points All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.	1 point All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.	0 points No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
Organization, Execution and Appearance	Level 5	Level 4	Level 3	Level 2	Level 1
Formatting	5 points Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	4 points MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	2 points MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	1 point MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	0 points Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
Grammar and Punctuation	5 points No grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	4 points Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	2 points Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	1 point Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	0 points More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Overall Score	Level 5 4 or more	Level 4 3 or more	Level 3 2 or more	Level 2 1 or more	Level 1 0 or more