english; your arguments about two articles

WARRAT'I'

L:,,*@awanttowrltewetlfou needtofoi theruies -:.:..'. ',' ,' ',,..,:rEt.Ofl*idfotsgsEsbdg!:-6.rtr,rB. '. ,, '.

'; ' ,'',. 1', ,E;,hfltl ?*ritilE lqqqher,,ry6sc. ". .' . ,, ' ,':::.',..',,:,,.:'REF,$wAL,,1 ",W * d,ct#. rt*r &e* n L*ri

anymore Howarer-.

Writers should usually not split their infinitives, unless they're translating Latin (in

which case they should never split them) or unless they are willing to risk appearing ungrammatical. Why should they do this? lt's simple: split infinitives

are ungrammatical. As we all know, in Latin, the infinitive was formed by a single

word; it was, accordingly, impossible to put an adverb inside the infinitive. While we don't write in Latin anymore and the rules of Latin don't automatically apply

to English, in the real world, many readers do in fact apply this rule to English. I know that my writing teacher does. He usually gives good advice about writing. Obviously, then, you shouldn't unnecessarily split your infinitives