I need a power point revised

profilehopecox45
IM3003_Rubric.pdf

©2016 Walden University 1

IM3003: Clinical Data Evaluation: Evaluate clinical data to support evidence-based decision making related to safe, quality healthcare delivery.

Assessment Rubric

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

Systems Thinking

Identify and describe any factors that may account for differences in performance measures.

LO1: Analyze factors for differences in performance measures.

Response is not present. Response includes a description of factors that is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Response includes an explanation of how factors may account for differences in performance measures that is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Response accurately and sufficiently identifies, describes, and explains factors that may account for differences in performance measures.

Response accurately and thoroughly relates the factors identified to performance measures.

Evaluate how these differences in performance measures might impact nursing practice.

LO2: Analyze how differences in performance measures impact nursing practice.

Response is not present. Response provides an explanation of how differences in performance measures impact nursing practice that is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Response critically evaluates how differences in performance measures impact nursing practice, including why these differences are important for nursing practice.

Core Measures

o Analyze the effect of publicly

reported data on the quality

and safety of care for ONE of

the following organizations:

Response is not present. Response includes an explanation of quality and safety data that is vague, illogical, or incomplete.

Response includes quality and safety data that is related to the healthcare organization selected. The data selected is complete and detailed.

©2016 Walden University 2

o Hospitals, nursing homes,

OR home health agencies

LO1: Analyze effect of reported data on quality and safety of care for healthcare organizations.

The quality and safety data included in the response is not related to the healthcare organization selected.

Hospital Compare

o Describe the quality and

safety data in your

comparison of two

healthcare organizations.

o

LO1: Compare quality and safety data of healthcare organizations.

Response is not present. Response includes a comparison of quality and safety data that is vague, illogical, or incomplete.

Quality and safety data that is included in the comparison is not relevant or reported for the healthcare organization selected.

Response includes a comparison of quality and safety data that is related to the healthcare organizations selected. The data selected is complete and detailed.

Clinical Decision Systems

o Recommend performance

measures that are based on

best practices for clinical

decision systems.

LO1: Evaluate recommendations based on best practices for clinical decision systems that will enhance performance measures for healthcare organizations.

Response is not present. Response includes a recommendation for enhancing performance of healthcare organizations that is vague, illogical, or incomplete.

Response does not relate recommendations for performance enhancement to a clinical decision system for patient quality and safety.

Response does not include an explanation of the nurse’s impact on enhancing performance for their healthcare organization.

Response includes recommendations for enhancing performance of a healthcare organization that is complete and detailed.

Response relates recommendations to clinical decision systems for patient quality and safety.

Response includes an explanation of how the nurse impacts performance in their healthcare organization.

©2016 Walden University 3

Exceeds Expectations: Inquiry and Analysis.

LO1: Use in-depth information from relevant sources presenting various points of view and approaches.

Presentation critically synthesizes information from at least 3 scholarly resources in support of informed recommendations to improve performance measures that enhance patient quality and safety in healthcare organizations.

 Yes  No

Written Communication: Write with clarity, coherence, and purpose.

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

LO1: Construct complete and correct sentences (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills)

Sentences are incoherent and impede reader’s access to ideas.

Sentences are incomplete and/or include fragments and run-on sentences, limiting reader’s access to ideas.

Sentences structure effectively conveys meaning to the reader.

©2016 Walden University 4

LO2: Demonstrate the effective use of grammar and mechanics. (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills)

Multiple inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics impede reader’s access to ideas.

Some inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics limit reader’s access to ideas.

Use of grammar and mechanics is straightforward and effectively conveys meaning to reader.

LO4: Use supporting material to support a claim. (AWE 2; Use of Evidence)

Supporting materials are not present.

Supporting material is used inconsistently or inappropriately.

Supporting material is used to enhance meaning. Writing is appropriately paraphrased and uses direct quotes as applicable.

LO6: Identify sources (AWE 2; Credit to source)

Sources are missing. Writing inconsistently identifies or misrepresents

Writing clearly identifies the source of nonoriginal material and/or ideas.

Information Literacy: Apply strategies to evaluate information sources. in order to effectively analyze issues and make decisions. 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

Analysis is not present.

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

LO2: Analyze information sources.

Synthesis is not present.

LO3: Synthesize information from multiple, credible sources.

Analysis superficially applies aspects of sources that are most

assessment and/or analysis is

Synthesis demonstrates a vague

unclear.

connection between multiple

relevant to the topic and/or

sources and/or the topic.

cohesive connection between multiple Synthesis demonstrates a clear and

sources and/or ideas to support a

No conclusions are made based on numeric information.

Connections between conclusions and numeric information are vague or inaccurate.

Conclusions identified are appropriately connected to the numeric information.

Quantitative evidence is not used.

Quantitative evidence does not support or is superfluous to the recommendation or decision.

Argument for a decision or recommendation incorporates appropriate quantitative data as evidence.

and/or graphic form.

LO3: Use quantitative data as evidence for a decision or recommendation.

presented in narrative from numeric information LO1: Identify conclusions

Analysis thoroughly and clearly

assessment.

applies aspects of sources that are most relevant to the topic and/or

given topic.

Interpreting Data & Quantitative Fluency: Interpret quantitative data in order to analyze issues and make decisions.

©2016 Walden University 5

Inquiry and Analysis: Apply strategies to identify, frame, and evaluate issues and problems. 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

LO1: Identify a problem or question in a selected area of study.

No problem or question is presented.

The problem or question is vague or inappropriate to the selected field of study.

The problem or question is clearly stated in a form appropriate to the selected field of study.

LO2: Use a logical organizing principle to identify the key parts or elements of a problem or question in a selected field of study.

Elements or parts of the problem or question are not presented.

Elements or parts of the problem or question are presented in a disorganized manner.

Elements or parts of the problem or question are presented in an organized manner.

Technology: Use technology effectively.

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

LO1: Apply the features of technology programs (i.e, Excel, Word, PowerPoint) to communicate information effectively.

Technology program is not applied appropriately.

Technology program includes multiple formatting issues and/or is difficult to interpret.

Technology program includes proper formatting.

Data can be easily read and interpreted.