ORGB : HUMAN INTERFACES - assignment

Appendix – A

Case-review Assessment Rubric

Levels: Criteria

Does Not Meet Expectations

0

Meets Expectations

4

Exceeds Expectations

6

Clarity

Writing is not clear. It is difficult to understand points being made. The writing lacks transitions, and few examples and/or illustrations are provided to support explanation or recommendations. Style including Structure, Flow, Grammar, and Spelling, APA format is not followed.

Writing is generally well- organized and understood. Transitions are used to facilitate clarity. Some examples and/illustrations are used to support explanation or recommendations. Style including Structure, Flow, Grammar, and Spelling, APA format is somewhat followed.

Writing is succinct, precise, effectively organized and without ambiguity. Transitions, explanation and elaboration are extensive to elucidate points. Detailed illustrations and/or examples are used to support explanation or recommendations. Style including Structure, Flow, Grammar, and Spelling, APA format is followed.

Relevance

Critical issues/questions are omitted or ignored in the writing.

Most of the critical issues/questions are addressed in the writing.

All critical issues/questions are addressed completely in the writing

Depth of Discussion

Ignores bias; Omits arguments Misrepresents issues; Excludes data; Includes but does not detect inconsistencies of information; Ideas contain unnecessary gaps, repetition or extraneous details; Overlooks arguments and ignores differences

Detects bias; Recognizes arguments; Categorizes content; Paraphrases data; Sufficient detail to support conclusions and/or recommendations

Analysis includes insightful questions; Refutes bias; Discusses issues thoroughly Critiques content; Values information Examines inconsistances; Offers extensive detail to support conclusions and recommendations; Suggests solutions or implementation.

Critical Thinking and Self-Reflection

Omits arguments or perspectives; Overlooks exploration of taken-for- granted or uncritically assimilated assumptions. content areas/concepts; Presents few options

Covers the breadth of the topic without being superfluous. Explores taken-for-granted or uncritically assimilated assumptions at a basic level of analysis

Considers multiple perspectives; Thoroughly delves into the issues/questions; Thoroughly discusses facts relevant to the issues. Demonstrated an exploration and analysis of uncritically assimilated or taken- for-granted assumptions.

Integration of Analysis of Ideas and Concepts

Fails to draw conclusions or conclusions rely on author’s authority rather than strength of presentation; Draws faulty conclusions; Shows intellectual dishonesty

Formulates clear conclusions with adequate support

Assimilates and critically reviews information, demonstrates reasoned judgment, and provides balanced, well justified conclusions

Total