model discussion quesitions

profileELEVEN NN
IlluminaCaseStudy2.0.pptx

Theories of innovation power

A case study of Illumina – The master of genome sequencing

Professor Vipin Gupta

1. Learning Objectives

Understanding Illumina’s strategic profiting process

How Illumina activates major steps in the strategic profiting process

Trading innovation power

Servicing innovation power

Grow innovation power

Critical Reflection – What can we really learn from the case of Illumina?

2. Understanding the Strategic Profiting Process

Trading innovation Power

Working with technological champions (B2R) who are creating blue ocean

Network blue ocean technological inputs worth trading for innovation power

Servicing innovation power

Working with organizational champions (B2B) to create blue ocean technological inputs

Network white ocean technological outputs – what support B2B firms need for servicing emerging blue ocean?

Grow innovation power

Working with community champions (B2C) so that they can develop their blue oceans

Network yellow ocean growth opportunities – what alliances can help us grow through Community championing, empowering many blue oceans to grow?

3. Major Steps in the Strategic Profiting Process

Grow Technological nodes with an emerging blue ocean

Network tech champions who are creating an emerging blue ocean

Grow Organizational nodes for developing white oceans

Network org champions who wish to create their own white oceans by servicing the emerging blue ocean

Grow Community nodes using yellow ocean strategy

Network community champions who wish to create their own blue oceans, using the above white ocean services

4. Case Study: Illumina – The Master of Genome Sequencing

Illumina’s three steps to strategic profiting

a. Grow Technological nodes linked to a blue ocean

Network tech champions who are creating an emerging blue ocean

Illumina started in 1998 to build on the gene analysis technology from Tufts university, but had only $180 million revenue in 2006 – as its DNA array technology being replaced by macro genome sequencing technology.

In 2006, it acquired British start-up Solexa (revenue $2.5 million) for $600 million, who developed sequencing by synthesis technique, 100 times faster than the first technique

Full sequencing was costly and slow, accessible to only institutional users: In 2006, the cost of full genome sequencing $300,000 and required full day

Illumina partnered with centers of excellence (e.g. UCLA and UCSD research institutes) throughout the US for testing its Next Generation Technology (NGS) machines – seeking research, best practices, training and support

a. Grow Technological nodes linked to a blue ocean

Benefits

Super-rapid growth: opened access to well-funded federal and research customers, knowledgeable about complementary steps – library sample preparation, cluster generation, and data analysis.

Targeted London-based largest genome sequencing center as primary customer, on the basis of throughput advantage

Within a year, Illumina generated $100 mn revenue in genome sequencing market.

In 2009, Illumina created a federally certified lab on premises to test new hardware and demonstrate possibilities in next-generation sequencing.

b. Grow Organizational nodes for developing white oceans

Network org champions who wish to create their own white oceans by servicing the emerging blue ocean

Video tutorials, webinars, manuals, and partnership with The Broad Institute to launch Genome Analyzer bootcamp, to address varying customer knowledge of optimal library preparation protocols and cluster generation tools

By 2013, invested $250 million on acquiring startups with automation tools for library sample preparation kits and cluster generation for genome-based diagnostics on diverse cases- humans, animals, pests, and plants. These steps required rare knowledge and were prone to inefficiencies and biases – even with optimal protocol.

Designed machine cutting total steps in the sequencing process from 38 to 8, and equipped it with an RFID chip to notify the operator with proper or improper loading

Interpretation of genome sequencing is difficult to analyze and interpret for experts and almost impossible for individuals.

IBM partnership: Using cloud-based AI – BaseSpace – to automate data analysis and interpretation; develop professional guidelines & clinical trials  reports that took scientists a week to process now done in just a matter of minutes

b. Grow Organizational nodes for developing white oceans

Benefits

Was able to subsidize cost of genome sequencing machinery, by making profits on consumables – sample preparation kits to simplify and accelerate tests, and patterned flow cells for efficient and unbiased cluster generation

Reduced the power of the knowledge club B2B customers, while adding a much larger B2B market

Why the knowledge club customers lose out?  not as purposefully focused on automating their knowledge for more cost-effective use by a broader network of organizations; hoarding for own advantage, with co-specialized complementary resources

c. Grow Community nodes using yellow ocean strategy

Network community champions who wish to create their own blue oceans, using the above white ocean services

Illumina accelerator program – Invest in promising genomics start-ups

Grail - For early stage detection of any type of cancer via blood test; raising $100 million from the venture capital firm Arch Venture Partners, plus Microsoft co-founder, Bill Gates, and Jeffrey Bezos, Amazon founder.

Verinata - For intelligent answers to specific fetal health issues, instead of providing the entire genome sequence to those who have little knowledge of how to make sense of that sequence. In 2013, acquired Verinata for $350 million for a special purpose diagnostic application – a direct competitor to several customers in noninvasive prenatal testing

Helix - To create genetic tests offered through an app store

c. Grow Community nodes using yellow ocean strategy

Benefits and Costs

In 2014, $10 million value NextGen machines based genome sequencing cost $10,000; and in 2012, HiGen machines based sequencing cost $48,000 per genome.

Leveraging improving throughput, Ancestry.com offered $1000 genome sequencing using NextGen, inspiring other entrants

In 2016, $650,000 NovaSeq machines with potential to cut sequencing cost to $100 per genome

In 2017, 25% stock value decline, as existing knowledgeable B2R and B2B customers not replacing older machines, and the new customers not growing sufficiently fast

New Globalization in 2017

Opened customer training and commercial center in France

Strategic alliance with KingMed Diagnostics in China - “to develop novel oncology and hereditary disease testing application” approved by Chinese government, using Illumina’s sequencing technology

Summing up: Illumina as Proficient Strategic Profiter

Create supplementary value (DO SHEENY). Trading innovation power

Network Technological champions  create blue ocean

Sustain complementary value (DO GUIDER). Servicing innovation power

Network Organizational champions  create white ocean

Destroy competitive value (Even if it is yours!). Grow innovation power

Network Community champions for growth  create yellow ocean

Summary – perpetually dynamic strategy

Strategic planning: compromise living  designing joyful intent

Strategic programming: precarious living  sustainable business strategy

Strategic learning: purposeless living  purposeful competitive advantage

Strategic profiting: networking entropy  proficient business model

Strategic development: exchange imbalance  functional value addition

Critical Reflection

Technological Exchange (Unit Value) Assessment

What can we really learn from the case of Illumina?

What are the issues in effective innovation and technological strategy?

Servicing platform for global value

How to mitigate the formative monetary costs of developing the method?

How to service and capture the value of method through a machine platform?

Trading sequence for upgrading

How to trade manpower capability for upgrading the value of the marketing power?

How to mitigate the costs of making transformative investments by trading the value of GUIDER vendor power?

Growth championing

How to champion growth by customizing manufacturing power (operational value) of our technology across different domains?

How to mitigate the costs of personalizing our technology within each targeted domain, by exchanging the energy of the motivated domain leaders to work on ascending SHEENY benefits?

How to norm effective method and aggregate servicing value of that method into machine platform?

Some customers have great method power

There is an opportunity to form machinery to capture the value of that method power

 form innovative linkages with the customers’ great method power

How to mitigate the cost of upgrading manpower capability, by trading vendor power?

Some vendors have great machinery power, others don’t

There is an opportunity to upgrade marketing power using the vendors’ great machinery power, without investing into your own manpower, to target larger, inclusive group of customers

 form creative linkages with the vendors’ great machinery power

How to champion growth by exchanging the energy of motivated domain leaders?

Some domain leaders have great monetary power, others don’t

There is an opportunity for customizing manufacturing power by exchanging (with your formative servicing) the energy of the motivated domain leaders with monetary power to champion growth in SHEENY benefits

How does this approach differ from traditional innovation and technological strategy?

Traditional model is about becoming a motivated firm who wishes to create a desirable method, even if it does not have the desired capability

Therefore, it needs to first invest in creating that desired capability, in the form of its workforce, and to fill the gaps using its networking

By the time it exchanges the desired capability, some customers have already found an alternative solution, and some firms have already transformed this solution into a competing machinery.