Papers

profileRsc1984
IHP610MilestoneFourGuidelinesandRubric.pdf

IHP 610 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric Description: For your fourth milestone in your final project, you will provide an in-depth analysis of the key elements related to your chosen issue. Your analysis of the issue should build on your Milestone Three outline and address the following elements:

A. Analyze the needs and interests of the key stakeholders you identified. Be sure to provide specific examples. B. Apply current healthcare laws, policies, and financing practices to the issue. Be sure to highlight any potential financial ramifications associated with the

issue. C. Explain why stakeholder value conflicts may exist in this environment. Be sure to justify your reasoning. D. Evaluate the legal risks and malpractice issues you identified in Milestone Two, being sure to analyze how conflicting values may impact potential legal

risks.

Guidelines for Submission: Your analysis should be 2 to 4 pages in length. It should be formatted in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with one- inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to current APA guidelines.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Analysis of Stakeholder Needs

Analyzes the needs and interests of key stakeholders with examples from each perspective

Analyzes the needs and interests of the stakeholders, but is missing examples from each perspective or overlooks key needs or stakeholders

Does not analyze the needs and interests of the key stakeholders

20

Application of Laws and Policies

Applies current healthcare laws, policies, and financing practices to the issue and highlights any potential financial ramifications associated with the issue

Applies laws and policies, but is missing supporting details or references to key applicable laws, policies, or financing practices

Does not apply current healthcare laws, policies, and financing practices to the issue

25

Explain Potential Conflicts Between

Stakeholders

Explains why potential conflicts may exist between the values of impacted stakeholders in the given environment

Explains why potential conflicts may exist, but is missing supporting details or key potential conflicts

Does not explain why potential conflicts may exist between the values of impacted stakeholders in the given environment

25

Evaluation of Legal and Malpractice Risks

Evaluates legal risks and malpractice issues, explaining how conflicting values may impact potential legal risks

Provides analysis of legal risks, but is missing key risks or conflicting values

Does not evaluate any legal risks and malpractice issues

20

Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has some errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%