IEP

IEPMeetingProjectDirectionsRubric9.30.183.docx

IEP Meeting Project Directions

Learner Outcomes:

LO 2.1 Delineate characteristics and prevalence of each exceptionality LO 2.2 Evaluate causes and concerns pertaining to each exceptionality LO 3.1 Critique and analyze components of IEPs

LO 3.2 Identify and analyze instructional assessments and strategies relevant to individuals with exceptional learning needs

IEP Project: (Analysis)

1. Read the article: http://www2.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide/iepguide.pdf in order to get an understanding of IEP meetings.

2. Read pages 49-54 of the course textbook (Friend, 2018) to refresh your memory about practices and procedures for IEP meetings.

3. View the four Youtube.com videos in the assignment directions folder.

4. After watching all of the videos, select two videos to compare (tell how they are alike) and contrast (tell how they are different).

5. Write a short paper (2-4 pages, double spaced, one inch margins, font size 12) in which you compare and contrast the videos.

6. Use the following outline:

IEP Analysis Project

Video #1: 1-2 pages identifying

a. who/what/when/where/why the IEP meeting took place

b. “best practices” (what was done correctly)

c. “worst practices” (what could be improved upon)

d. what did you learn from watching the video Video #2: 1-2 pages identifying

a. who/what/when/where/why the IEP meeting took place

b. “best practices” (what was done correctly)

c. “worst practices” (what could be improved upon)

d. what did you learn from watching the video Analysis of Videos: 1-2 pages identifying

a. how the two videos are alike

b. how the two videos are different

c. implications for IEP meetings

d. IEP Meeting Project Rubric

IEP Meeting Project Rubric

	Proficient	Competent	Developing
	30 points	27 points	24 points
Video #1 Critique	All six criteria met for Video #1: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Five criteria met for Video #1: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Four criteria met for Video #1: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.
	30 points	27 points	24 points
Video #2 Critique	All six criteria met for Video #2: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Five criteria met for Video #2: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Four criteria met for Video #2: IEP information of who, what, when, where, and why were identified. Best (correct) practices were addressed. Worst (needs improvement) practices were described. Information learned from the video was discussed. Critique was 1-2 pages in length. Critique showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.
	20 points	18 points	16 points
Analysis of Videos	All four criteria met for Analysis of Videos: Analysis identified how the two videos were alike. Analysis addressed how the two videos were different. Implications for IEP meetings were discussed. Analysis was 1-2 pages in length. Analysis showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Three criteria met for Analysis of Videos: Analysis identified how the two videos were alike. Analysis addressed how the two videos were different. Implications for IEP meetings were discussed. Analysis was 1-2 pages in length. Analysis showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.	Two criteria met for Analysis of Videos: Analysis identified how the two videos were alike. Analysis addressed how the two videos were different. Implications for IEP meetings were discussed. Analysis was 1-2 pages in length. Analysis showed evidence of effective thinking and creative expression.
	10 points	9 points	8 points
MUGSS	Assignment contained minimal (zero to two) errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.	Assignment contained few (three to five) errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.	Assignment contained numerous (six or more) errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
	10 points	9 points	8 points
APA Format	All three criteria were met: Title page, running head, margins, spacing, and font follow APA format. In-text citations in APA format and used appropriately. All pertinent reference information included in APA format in References.	Two criteria were met: Title page, running head, margins, spacing, and font follow APA format. In-text citations in APA format and used appropriately. All pertinent reference information included in APA format in References.	One criterion was met: Title page, running head, margins, spacing, and font follow APA format. In-text citations in APA format and used appropriately. All pertinent reference information included in APA format in References.