IT Governance report for IOT

KING’S OWN INSTITUTE* Success in Higher Education

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 1 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220

All information in the Subject Outline is correct at the time of approval. KOI reserves the right to make changes to the Subject Outline if they become necessary. Any changes require the approval of the KOI Academic Board and will be formally advised

to those students who may be affected by email and via Moodle. Information contained within this Subject Outline applies to students enrolled in the trimester as indicated

1. General Information 1.1 Administrative Details

Associated HE Award(s) Duration Level Subject Coordinator

Master of Information Technology (MIT) Graduate Diploma of Information Technology (GDIT) Graduate Certificate of Information Technology (GCIT)

1 trimester Postgraduate Dr Shafiqur Rahman [email protected] P: 92833583 L: Level 1-2, 17 O’Connell St. Consultation: via Moodle or by appointment.

1.2 Core/Elective This subject is o a core subject for the Master of Information Technology (MIT) o a core subject for the Graduate Diploma of Information Technology (GDIT) o a core subject for the Graduate Certificate of Information Technology (GCIT) 1.3 Subject Weighting Indicated below is the weighting of this subject and the total course points

Subject Credit Points Total Course Credit Points

4 MIT (64 Credit Points); GDIT (32 Credit Points); GCIT (16 Credit Points)

1.4 Student Workload Indicated below is the expected student workload per week for this subject

No. Timetabled Hours/Week* No. Personal Study Hours/Week**

Total Workload Hours/Week***

4 hours/week (2 hour Lecture + 2 hour Tutorial)

6 hours/week 10 hours/week

* Total time spent per week at lectures and tutorials ** Total time students are expected to spend per week in studying, completing assignments, etc. *** Combination of timetable hours and personal study 1.5 Mode of Delivery Blended, that is face-to-face/online 1.6 Pre-requisites Nil 1.7 General Study and Resource Requirements o Students are expected to attend classes with the weekly worksheets and subject support material

provided in Moodle. Students should read this material before coming to class to improve their ability to participate in the weekly activities.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 2 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

o Students will require access to the internet and their KOI email and should have basic skills in word processing software such as MS Word, spreadsheet software such as MS Excel and visual presentation software such as MS PowerPoint.

o Computers and WIFI facilities are extensively available for student use throughout KOI. Students are encouraged to make use of the campus Library for reference materials.

Software resource requirements specific to this subject: Office 365, MS Imagine

2. Academic Details 2.1 Overview of the Subject This subject will build the knowledge and skills required to successfully contribute to the development, management and integration of strategic computer-based systems within an organisational setting. The subject provides a business, government and management perspective of IT, outlining the important IT governance frameworks used by businesses, governments, managers and IT professionals as well as leaders to achieve the best possible organisational outcomes from strategic investments in IT. It identifies the major current trends and IT applications being used by organisations and examines contemporary areas of concern such as security, privacy and ethics. The subject also considers key emerging IT technologies and examines how they may affect businesses, governments, IT professionals and leaders in the near future. 2.2 Graduate Attributes for Postgraduate Courses Graduates of postgraduate courses from King’s Own Institute will achieve the graduate attributes expected from successful completion of a postgraduate degree under the Australian Qualifications Framework (2nd edition, January 2013). Graduates at this level will be able to apply advanced body of knowledge in a range of contexts for professional practice or scholarship and as a pathway for further learning. King’s Own Institute’s key generic graduate attributes for a postgraduate degree are summarised below:

KOI Postgraduate Degree Graduate Attributes Detailed Description

Knowledge Current, comprehensive and coherent knowledge, including recent developments and applied research methods

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking skills to identify and analyse current theories and developments and emerging trends in professional practice

Communication

Communication and technical skills to analyse and theorise, contribute to professional practice or scholarship, and present ideas to a variety of audiences

Research and Information Literacy

Cognitive and technical skills to access and evaluate information resources, justify research approaches and interpret theoretical propositions

Creative Problem Solving Skills

Cognitive, technical and creative skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise complex information, concepts and theories, solve complex problems and apply established theories to situations in professional practice

Ethical and Cultural Sensitivity

Appreciation and accountability for ethical principles, cultural sensitivity and social responsibility, both personally and professionally

Leadership and Strategy

Initiative, leadership skills and ability to work professionally and collaboratively to achieve team objectives across a range of team roles Expertise in strategic thinking, developing and implementing business plans and decision making under uncertainty

Professional Skills High level personal autonomy, judgement, decision-making and accountability required to begin professional practice

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 3 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Across the courses, these skills are developed progressively at three levels:

o Level 1 Foundation – Students learn the skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them in stand-alone contexts

o Level 2 Intermediate – Students further develop skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them in more complex contexts, beginning to integrate the application with other subjects

o Level 3 Advanced – Students have a demonstrated ability to plan, research and apply the skills, theories and techniques of the subject in complex situations, integrating the subject content with a range of other subject disciplines within the context of the course

Generally, skills gained from subjects in the Graduate Certificate and Graduate Diploma are at levels 1 and 2 while other subjects in the Master’s degree are at level 3. 2.3 Subject Learning Outcomes Listed below, are key knowledge and skills students are expected to attain by successfully completing this subject:

Subject Learning Outcomes Contribution to Graduate Attributes

a) Identify the organisational and IT professional benefits gained through the use of a major IT governance framework in managing the IT resources of an organisation

b) Examine the significant risks currently facing the IT industry and critique the steps being taken by the industry, business and governments to mitigate them

c) Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of major organisational IT technologies in current use

d) Assess and critically evaluate the impacts of emerging technologies such as Push and Pull innovation processes; Artificial Intelligence (AI); Immersive Technology (MR/AR/VR); Internet of Things (IoT); Blockchain

2.4 Subject Content and Structure Below are details of the subject content and how it is structured, including specific topics covered in lectures and tutorials. Reading refers to the text unless otherwise indicated. Weekly Planner:

Week (beginning)

Topic covered in each week’s lecture Reading(s)

Expected work as listed in Moodle

1 06 Jul

Introduction to IT governance and emerging technologies Emerging technologies - AI

Ch. 2 Smallwood (2018)

Readings review questions /discussion Formative not graded

2 13 Jul

IT governance frameworks Emerging technologies - Immersive technologies (MR, AR, VR)

Ch. 2 Smallwood (2019

Readings review questions /discussion

3 20 Jul

IT governance frameworks - COBIT Emerging technologies - Robotics

Sections from Harmer

Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 2 due

4 27 Jul

IT governance frameworks – ITIL Emerging technologies - 3D printing & additive manufacturing

Sections from Agutter

Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 3 due Assessment 1: Quiz 1

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 4 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

5 03 Aug

Personal, legal, ethical and social issues. Protecting information. Emerging technologies – 5G

Ch. 4 Smallwood (2019)

Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 4 due

6 10 Aug

Emerging technologies – IoT Australia’s IoT Opportunity: Driving Future Growth

Get assessment 3 topic approved. Readings review questions /discussion Tutorial 5 due

16 Aug 2020 –

23 Aug 2020 Mid trimester break

7 24 Aug

Emerging technologies – Blockchain

Blockchain Challenges for Australia

Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 6 due

8 31 Aug

Developing an information management policy Emerging technologies – transport

NAA readings Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 7 due

9 07 Sep

IG in health Emerging technologies – health, medicine & biometrics

Case Study: The IG Problem in Healthcare (in Smallwood, 2018)

Readings review questions / discussion Tutorial 8 due

10 14 Sep

e-Government Emerging technologies – speech recognition & smart speakers

Introducing integrated e- government in Australia

Readings review questions /discussion Tutorial 9 due Assessment 3: Presentations/demos

11 21 Sep

The future of work Digital Pulse (Australia) 2019

Readings review questions /discussion Tutorial 10 due Assessment 3: Report due, remaining presentations/demos

12 28 Sep

Subject Review All course material

Revise all tutorial exercises

13 04 Oct Study Review Week

14 12 Oct Final Exam Week

Please see Exam Timetable for exam date, time and location

15 18 Oct

Student Vacation begins Enrolments for T320 open

16 26 Oct

Results Released 27 Oct 2020 Certification of Grades 30 Oct 2020

T320 begins 02 Nov 2020

1 02 Nov

Week 1 of classes for T320 Friday 30 Oct 2020 – Review of Grade Day for T220 – see Sections 2.6 and 3.2 below for more information.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 5 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

2.5 Public Holiday Amendments Please note: KOI is closed on all scheduled NSW Public Holidays. T220 has one (1) public holiday (Labour Day) that occurs during this trimester. Classes scheduled for this public holiday (Calendar Class Dates) will be rescheduled as per the table below. This applies to ALL subjects taught in T220. Please see the table below and adjust your class timing as required. Please make sure you have arrangements in place to attend the rescheduled classes if applicable to your T220 enrolment. Classes will be conducted at the same time and in the same location as your normally scheduled class except these classes will be held on the date shown below.

Calendar Class Date Rescheduled Class Date

Monday 05 October 2020 (Week 13) Study Review Week

Not required

2.6 Review of Grade, Deferred Exams & Supplementary Exams/Assessments Review of Grade: There may be instances when you believe that your final grade in a subject does not accurately reflect your performance against the subject criteria. Section 8 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy (www.koi.edu.au) describes the grounds on which you may apply for a Review of Grade. If this happens and you are unable to resolve it with the Academic staff concerned then you can apply for a formal Review of Grade within the timeframes indicated in the following sections of this subject outline - Supplementary Assessments, 3.2 Appeals Process as well as the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy. Please ensure you read the Review of Grade information before submitting an application. Review of Grade Day: Final exam scripts will not normally be returned to students. Students can obtain feedback on their exam performance at the Review of Grade Day. KOI will hold the Review of Grade Day for all subjects studied in T220 on

Friday 30 October 2020

Only final exams will be discussed as all other assessments should have been reviewed during the trimester. If you fail one or more subjects and you wish to consider applying for a Review of Grade you are STRONGLY ADVISED to attend the Review of Grade Day. You will have the chance to discuss your final exam with your lecturer, and will be advised if you have valid reasons for applying for a Review of Grade (see Section 3.2 below and the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy). A formal request for a review of grade may not be considered unless you first contact the subject coordinator to discuss the result. Deferred Exams: If you wish to apply for a deferred exam, you should submit an Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Form before the prescribed deadline. If you miss your mid-trimester or final exam there is no guarantee you will be offered a deferred exam.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 6 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

You must apply within the stated timeframe and satisfy the conditions for approval to be offered a deferred exam (see Section 8.1 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy and the Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Forms). In assessing your request for a deferred exam, KOI will take into account the information you provide, the severity of the event or circumstance, your performance on other items of assessment in the subject, class attendance and your history of previous applications for special consideration. Deferred mid-trimester exams will be held before the end of week 9. Deferred final exams will be held on two days during week 1 or 2 in the next trimester. You will not normally be granted a deferred exam on the grounds that you mistook the time, date or place of an examination, or that you have made arrangements to be elsewhere at that time; for example, have booked plane tickets. If you are offered a deferred exam, but do not attend you will be awarded 0 marks for the exam. This may mean it becomes difficult for you to pass the subject. If you apply for a deferred exam within the required time frame and satisfy the conditions you will be advised by email (to your KOI student email address) of the time and date for the deferred exam. Please ensure that you are available to take the exam at this time. Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that item of assessment towards your final mark in the subject. Supplementary Assessments (Exams and Assessments): A supplementary assessment may be offered to students to provide a final opportunity to demonstrate successful achievement of the learning outcomes of a subject. Supplementary assessments are only offered at the discretion of the Board of Examiners. In considering whether or not to offer a supplementary assessment, KOI will take into account your performance on all the major assessment items in the subject, your attendance, participation and your history of any previous special considerations. Students are eligible for a supplementary assessment for their final subject in a course where they fail the subject but have successfully completed all other subjects in the course. You must have completed all major assessment tasks for the subject and obtained a passing mark on at least one of the major assessment tasks to be eligible for a supplementary assessment. If you believe you meet the criteria for a supplementary assessment for the final subject in your course, but have not received an offer, complete the “Complaint, Grievance, Appeal Form” and send your form to [email protected]. The deadline for applying for supplementary assessment is the Friday of the first week of classes in the next trimester. If you are offered a supplementary assessment, you will be advised by email to your KOI student email address of the time and due date for the supplementary assessment – supplementary exams will normally be held at the same time as deferred final exams during week 1 or week 2 of the next trimester. You must pass the supplementary assessment to pass the subject. The maximum grade you can achieve in a subject based on a supplementary assessment is a PASS grade. If you: o are offered a supplementary assessment, but fail it; o are offered a supplementary exam, but do not attend; or o are offered a supplementary assessment but do not submit by the due date; you will receive a FAIL grade for the subject.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 7 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

2.7 Teaching Methods/Strategies Briefly described below are the teaching methods/strategies used in this subject:

o Lectures (2 hours/week) are conducted in seminar style and address the subject content, provide motivation and context and draw on the students’ experience and preparatory reading.

o Tutorials (2 hours/week) include class discussion of case studies and research papers, practice sets and problem-solving and syndicate work on group projects. Tutorials often include group exercises and so contribute to the development of teamwork skills and cultural understanding. Tutorial participation is an essential component of the subject and contributes to the development of many of the graduate attributes (see section 2.2 above). Tutorial participation contributes towards the assessment in many subjects (see details in Section 3.1 for this subject). Supplementary tutorial material such as case studies, recommended readings, review questions etc. will be made available each week in Moodle.

o Online teaching resources include class materials, readings, model answers to assignments and exercises and discussion boards. All online materials for this subject as provided by KOI will be found in the Moodle page for this subject. Students should access Moodle regularly as material may be updated at any time during the trimester

o Other contact - academic staff may also contact students either via Moodle messaging, or via email to the email address provided to KOI on enrolment.

2.8 Student Assessment

Assessment is designed to encourage effective student learning and enable students to develop and demonstrate the skills and knowledge identified in the subject learning outcomes. Assessment tasks during the first half of the study period are usually intended to maximise the developmental function of assessment (formative assessment). These assessment tasks include weekly tutorial exercises (as indicated in the weekly planner) and low stakes graded assessments (as shown in the graded assessment table). The major assessment tasks where students demonstrate their knowledge and skills (summative assessment) generally occur later in the study period. These are the major graded assessment items shown in the graded assessment table.

Final grades are awarded by the Board of Examiners in accordance with KOI's Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy. The definitions and guidelines for the awarding of final grades are:

o HD High distinction (85-100%): an outstanding level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.

o D Distinction (75-84%): a high level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.

o C Credit (65-74%): a better than satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.

o P Pass (50-64%): a satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.

o F Fail (0-49%): an unsatisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.

o FW: This grade will be assigned when a student did not submit any of the compulsory assessment items.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 8 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Provided below is a schedule of formal assessment tasks and major examinations for the subject

Assessment Type When assessed Weighting Learning

Outcomes Assessed

Assessment 1: Quiz 1 Week 4 5% a, b

Assessment 2: Tutorial activities - individual assessment

Weeks 3-11 10% a, b, c, d

Assessment 3: Emerging technology report and presentation (2,000 word report + 10 minute presentation/demo) - individual assessment

Weeks 11 Weeks 10-11

Report: 25% Presentation / Demonstration: 10% Total 35%

c, d

Assessment 4: Final exam (2,5 hours plus 10 minutes reading time)

Final exam period 50%

a, b, c, d

Requirements to Pass the Subject: To gain a pass or better in this subject, students must gain a minimum of 50% of the total available subject marks. 2.9 Prescribed and Recommended Readings Provided below, in formal reference format, is a list of the prescribed and recommended readings.

Prescribed Texts: No prescribed text Recommended Readings: Agutter, C., 2019. ITIL® 4 Essentials: Your essential guide for the ITIL 4 Foundation exam and beyond, IT Governance Publishing. Harmer, G., 2014. Governance of Enterprise IT based on COBIT®5, IT Governance Publishing Reynolds, G.W., 2016. Information Technology for Managers. 2nd ed., Cengage Smallwood, R., 2018. Information Governance for Healthcare Professionals. Productivity Press Smallwood, R., 2019. Information Governance: Concepts, Strategies and Best Practices, 2nd ed., Wiley Suggested Periodicals: o ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems: https://jetc.acm.org . o Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research: http:// http://www.jetir.org Useful Websites: The following industry websites are useful introductory sources covering a range of information useful for this subject.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 9 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

o IT Governance (COBIT): https://www.itgovernanceusa.com/cobit o IT Governance (ITIL): http:// www.itinfo.am/eng/information-technology-infrastructure-library-guide/ o Deloitte, Tech Trends 2018: https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/technology/articles/tech-trends. o Info-Tech Research Group, 2018 CIO Trend Report: http://go.infotech.com/2018-CIO-Trend-Report-G o SAP Trend Report 2018: Emerging Technology Trends:

https://www.sap.com/documents/2018/04/02112563-007d-0010-87a3-c30de2ffd8ff.html o Artificial Intelligence - SAS 2018: https://www.sas.com/en_au/insights/analytics/what-is-artificial-

intelligence.html

o Immersive Technologies – MR, AR, VR (Also has great links to other emerging technologies): https://www.realitytechnologies.com/

o Internet of Things – Gartner Report 2017: https://emtemp.gcom.cloud/ngw/eventassets/en/conferences/content/research- assets/IoT%20Technology%20Disruptions_%20A%20Gartner%20Trend%20Insight%20Report.pdf

o Blockchain – IBM 2018: https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/what-is-blockchain Conference/ Journal Articles: Students are encouraged to read peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers. Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can search across many disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites.

3. Assessment Details 3.1 Details of Each Assessment Item The assessments for this subject are described below. The description includes the type of assessment, its purpose, weighting, due date and submission requirements, the topic of the assessment, details of the task and detailed marking criteria, including a marking rubric for essays, reports and presentations. Supplementary assessment information and assistance can be found in Moodle. KOI expects students to submit their own work in both assignments and exams, or the work of their group in the case of group assignments. Material in assignments which comes from the work of others must be appropriately acknowledged. Assessment 1 Assessment type: Quiz Purpose: This assessment will allow students to demonstrate that they have understood the concepts covered in weeks 1 to 3. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a and b Value: 5% Due date: Week 4 Task details: The quiz will consist of questions and problems relating to subject content from weeks 1 – 3 inclusive Grading Guide Assessment 1:

Criteria Quiz score out of 5

Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Effective Excellent Exceptional

Fail (0 – 49%)

Pass (50 – 64%)

Credit (65 – 74%)

Distinction (75 – 84%)

High Distinction (85 – 100%)

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 10 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Assessment 2 Assessment type: Tutorial activities - individual assessment Assessment purpose: Complete weekly tutorial activities. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b, c and d Value: 10% Due Date: Weeks 3-11 Assessment topic: Tutorial activities Task details: Complete and upload to Moodle responses to the weekly tutorial activities Submission requirements details: Weeks 3-11 (for tutorials from week 2 – week 10) Submission: Submit the completed responses on Moodle by the end of the tutorial in the following week Marking Rubric for Assessment 2 - 10%

Grade Fail (0 – 49%)

Pass (50 – 64%)

Credit (65 – 74%)

Distinction (75 – 84%)

High Distinction

(85 – 100%) Tutorial Exercises 10 marks

Less than 50%of the tutorial exercises completed or many major errors or omissions

Most tutorial exercises completed, but with some major errors or omissions

Most tutorial exercises completed, but with some minor errors and omissions

Nearly all tutorial exercises completed, but with some minor errors and omissions

All tutorial exercises complete and accurate or with few very minor errors

Assessment 3 Assessment type: Report on Internet of Things (IoT) technology application and presentation (2,000 word report + 10 minute presentation/demo) - individual assessment. Assessment purpose: Produce a report evaluating an Internet of Things (IoT) technology application agreed with the lecturer in Week 6. The IoT should be one of smart home, smart health, smart agriculture, smart energy, smart cities, smart transportation, smart living, a different internet of things (if agreed to by the lecturer in Week 6). This assessment contributes to learning outcomes c and d. Value: 35% (Report 25%; Presentation/Demonstration 10%) Due Date: Weeks 10-11 Assessment topic: Internet of Things Task details: Part A: Report The internet of things report must be written in business report format and should include at least the following sections: Cover page, executive summary, table of contents Introduction: Briefly introduce the technology being evaluated Main Body: o Describe the internet of things and its claimed application and benefits to organisations o Identify the potential scope for use in business and government organisations and the benefits o Give examples of “use” cases in organisations Outline potential impacts of the technology: o Will it disrupt or affect industry and/or IT? How? o What issues in ethics, law and society will it raise? o How will it affect organisations, IT departments, CIOs and IT professionals?

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 11 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Summary and Conclusion: Provide your overall evaluation of the potential benefits of the internet of things along with any associated issues and the likely time frame for adopting the technology by organisations. Make clear recommendations for organisations in regard to the technology Part B: Presentation / Demonstration Present your findings on this internet of things. Where appropriate, include a demonstration Submission requirements details: Report Due Date: Week 11. Submit the completed written evaluation report on Moodle The presentation/demonstration will be during tutorials in Weeks 10 and 11 Marking Rubric for Assessment 3 – Report – 25%

Criteria Fail (0 – 49%)

Pass (50 – 64%)

Credit (65 – 74%)

Distinction (75 – 84%)

High Distinction (85 – 100%)

Format and structure 4 marks

Very difficult to read, unclear structure, and most of the required sections are missing

Some difficulty in reading, not very clear, but important sections are included

Clear and readable, and all required sections are included

Well written and very clear, and all required sections with completed discussion are included

Well written and very clear, all required sections with completed discussion are included, and additional sections have been added for clarity

Introduction 3 marks

No introduction given or most of the introduction is irrelevant

Introduction is provided with some details and limited cohesion

Introduction is provided with most of the required details in cohesive manner

Introduction is provided with all of the required details in comprehensive and cohesive manner

Introduction is provided with all details presented systematically in a comprehensive and cohesive manner

Discussion

8 marks

No evidence/ support for the argument in the main body

Provides some evidence/support for the argument in the main body

Provides sound level of evidence/ support for the logical argument

Provides very convincing level of evidence/support for the strong logical argument

Provides exceptional level of support for the compelling argument

Conclusion

4 marks

No conclusion presented or not based on argument, recommendation unconvincing

Conclusion based on argument but lacks supporting evidence recommendation lacks some detail

Conclusion based on sound argument and evidence, recommendation convincing

Conclusion based on an extensive argument and evidence, recommendation strongly convincing

Conclusion based on an extensive and compelling argument, recommendation persuasive and convincing

Knowledge of emerging technology

6 marks

Very little subject matter knowledge shown

Adequate subject matter knowledge shown

Sound subject matter knowledge shown

High level of subject matter knowledge shown, some relevance to organisations shown

High level of subject matter knowledge and relevance to organisations shown

Total mark out of 25

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 12 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Marking Rubric for Assessment 3 – Presentation/Demonstration – 10% Criteria Fail

(0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%)

Credit (65 – 74%)

Distinction (75 – 84%)

High Distinction (85 – 100%)

Information quality 1 mark

Presentation lacks main points and related details. Information lacks connection to the presentation topic. Information is not organised.

Main points are not clear and lack significant detail. Some information is linked to the presentation topic. Information is loosely organised.

Main points are somewhat clear but could use more detail. Most information is linked to the presentation topic. Information is organised.

Main points are clear and detailed. Information is linked to presentation topic. Information is well organised.

Main points are very clear and very detailed. Information is directly linked to presentation topic. Information is very organised.

Nonverbal communication 2 marks

Speaker appears very uneasy and insecure. Speaker faces away from the audience or makes no eye contact. Speaker appears disengaged from the audience. Speaker lacks any body motions or gestures or demonstrates consistently distraction body motions or gestures.

Speaker appears uneasy and somewhat insecure. Speaker rarely faces the audience or makes eye contact. Speaker rarely appears to be engaging with the audience. Speaker uses few body motions or gestures or has gestures or movements that distract the audience.

Speaker appears generally at ease and confident. Speaker sometimes faces the audience and maintains eye contact. Speaker sometimes appears to be engaging with the audience. Speaker's body motions and gestures neither support nor detract from presentation.

Speaker appears fairly comfortable and confident. Speaker generally faces the audience and maintains good eye contact. Speaker generally appears to be engaging with the audience. Speaker uses body motions and gestures well.

Speaker appears very comfortable and confident. Speaker consistently faces the audience and maintains good eye contact. Speaker consistently appears to be engaging with the audience. Speaker uses body motions and gestures very effectively.

Verbal communication 2 marks

Speaker’s voice is consistently too weak or too strong. Speaker fails to use inflections to emphasize key points and create interest or speaker often uses inflections inappropriately. Speaker's talking pace is consistently too slow or too fast.

Speaker’s voice is frequently too weak or too strong. Speaker rarely uses inflections to emphasize key points and create interest or speaker sometimes uses inflections inappropriately. Speaker's talking pace is often too slow or too fast.

Speaker’s voice is generally steady, strong and clear. Speaker sometimes uses inflections to emphasize key points and create interest. Speaker's talking pace is appropriate.

Speaker’s voice is steady, strong and clear. Speaker often uses inflections to emphasize key points and create interest. Speaker's talking pace is mostly appropriate.

Speaker’s voice is very confident, steady, strong, and clear. Speaker consistently uses inflections to emphasize key points or to create interest. Speaker's talking pace is consistently appropriate.

Visual tools 2 marks Visual aids demonstrate no creativity or clarity and are often difficult to read. Presentation is weakened by the visual tools.

Visual aids have limited creativity or clarity or are sometimes difficult to read. Presentation is not enhanced by the visual tools.

Visual aids are reasonably creative, clear, and easy to read. Presentation is sometimes enhanced by the visual tools.

Visual aids are usually creative, clear, and easy to read. Presentation is often enhanced by the visual tools.

Visual aids are very creative, clear, and easy to read. Presentation is consistently enhanced by the visual tools.

Detail and preparation 1 mark

Slides have numerous errors and lack detail. Little care taken in the production.

Slides may have some errors and show some detail. Some care has been taken in production.

Evident that slides are correct and show a general attention to detail and accuracy. General care has been taken in production.

Clearly evident that slides are correct, detailed and accurate. Care has been taken in the production.

Slides are clear, well-constructed, accurate and show attention to detail. Extra care has been taken in the production.

Overall effectiveness 2 marks

This presentation was weak and not effective.

This presentation was average and somewhat effective.

This presentation was good and effective.

This was a very good presentation and very effective.

This was an exceptional, professional presentation and extremely effective.

Total Mark /10 Comments:

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 13 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Assessment 4 Assessment Type: Final exam – closed book - individual assessment. Duration: 2,5 hours plus 10 minutes reading time. Purpose: The purpose of the final examination is to test the students’ understanding of the subject’s concepts and their ability to apply these concepts. This assessment contributes specifically to learning outcomes a, b, c, and d. Value: 50% Due Date: The final exam will be held in the official KOI exam period in Week 14

of the trimester. The specific date and time will be posted towards the end of the trimester

Topic: The examination may cover content from any part of the subject Task Details: The exam will consist of short answer, extended answer and scenario based questions derived from topics covered in the lectures and tutorials during the trimester. 3.2 General information about assessment a) Late Penalties and Extensions An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in-class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty (see below). Students who miss mid-trimester tests and final exams without a valid and accepted reason (see below) may not be granted a deferred exam and will be awarded 0 marks for assessment item. These penalties are designed to encourage students to develop good time management practices, and create equity for all students. Any penalties applied will only be up to the maximum marks available for the specific piece of assessment attracting the penalty. Late penalties, granting of extensions and deferred exams are based on the following: In Class Tests (excluding Mid-Trimester Tests) o No extensions permitted or granted – a make-up test may only be permitted under very special

circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. The procedures and timing to apply for a make-up test (only if available) are as shown in section Applying for an Extension (see below).

o Missing a class test will result in 0 marks for that assessment element unless the above applies. Written Assessments o 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is approved (see Applying for an

Extension section below) Presentations o No extensions permitted or granted – no presentation = 0 marks. The rules for make-up presentations

are the same as for missing in-class tests (described above). Mid-Trimester Tests and Final Exams o If students are unable to attend mid-trimester tests or final exams due to illness or some other event

(acceptable to KOI), they must: − Advise KOI in writing (email: [email protected]) as soon as possible, but no later than three

(3) working days after the exam date, that they will be / were absent and the reasons. They will be advised in writing (return email) as to whether the circumstances are acceptable.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 14 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

− Complete the appropriate Application for Extension or Deferred Exam Form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, on the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St), as soon as possible and email with attachments to [email protected].

− Provide acceptable documentary evidence in the form of a satisfactorily detailed medical certificate, police report or some other evidence that will be accepted by KOI.

− Agree to attend the deferred exam as set by KOI. Deferred exam o There will only be one deferred exam offered. o Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that assessment. o If you miss the deferred exam you will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment. This may mean you

are unable to complete (pass) the subject. b) Applying for an Extension If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date. The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to [email protected]. Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable.

Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension. c) Referencing and Plagiarism Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks must be suitably referenced. Failure to acknowledge sources is plagiarism, and as such is a very serious academic issue. Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serious repeat cases. Exclusion has serious visa implications. The easiest way to avoid plagiarising is to reference all sources. Harvard referencing is the required method – in-text referencing using Author’s Surname (family name) and year of publication. A Referencing Guide, “Harvard Referencing”, and a Referencing Tutorial can be found on the right hand menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages. An effective way to reference correctly is to use Microsoft Word’s referencing function (please note that other versions and programs are likely to be different). To use the referencing function, click on the References Tab in the menu ribbon – students should choose Harvard. Authorship is also an issue under plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group project. All students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic misconduct and can attract severe penalties: o Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied from another

student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.

o Copying / cheating in tests and exams is academic misconduct. Such incidents will be treated just as seriously as other forms of plagiarism.

o Students who willingly allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020

ICT710

ICT710 IT GOVERNANCE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES T220 25/06/2020 15:54 PAGE 15 OF 15 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Where a subject coordinator considers that a student might have engaged in academic misconduct, KOI may require the student to undertake an additional oral exam as a part of the assessment for the subject, as a way of testing the student’s understanding of their work. Further information can be found on the KOI website. d) Reasonable Adjustment The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to treat people with a disability less fairly than people without a disability. In the context of this subject, the principle of Reasonable Adjustment is applied to ensure that participants with a disability have equitable access to all aspects of the learning situation. For assessment, this means that artificial barriers to their demonstrating competence are removed. Examples of reasonable adjustment in assessment may include: o provision of an oral assessment, rather than a written assessment o provision of extra time o use of adaptive technology. The focus of the adjusted assessment should be on enabling the participants to demonstrate that they have achieved the subject purpose, rather than on the method used. e) Appeals Process Full details of the KOI Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy may be obtained in hard copy from the Library, and on the KOI website www.koi.edu.au under Policies and Forms. Assessments and Mid-Trimester Exams: Where students are not satisfied with the results of an assessment, including mid-trimester exams, they have the right to appeal. The process is as follows: o Discuss the assessment with their tutor or lecturer – students should identify where they feel more

marks should have been awarded – students should provide valid reasons based on the marking guide provided for the assessment. Reasons such as “I worked really hard” are not considered valid.

o If still not satisfied, students should complete an Application for Review of Assessment Marks form, detailing the reason for review. This form can be found on the KOI website and is also available at KOI Reception (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St).

o Application for Review of Assessment Marks forms must be submitted as explained on the form within ten (10) working days of the return of the marked assessment, or within five (5) working days after the return of the assessment if the assessment is returned after the end of the trimester.

Review of Grade – whole of subject and final exams: Where students are not satisfied with the results of the whole subject or with their final exam results, they have the right to request a Review of Grade – see the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy for more information. An Application for Review of Grade/Assessment Form (available from the KOI Website under Policies and Forms and from KOI Reception at Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St) should be completed clearly explaining the grounds for the application. The completed application should be submitted as explained on the form, with supporting evidence attached, to the Academic Manager.

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T2 2020