Assessment 2: Case Study

ICT3051AssessmentBrief-T320242.pdf

Home >Computer Science homework help >Assessment 2: Case Study

Assessment Brief: ICT3051 Enterprise Networking Trimester 3, 2024

Assessment Overview

Assessment 1: Laboratory Practicum Students Due date: Week 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 Group/individual: Individual Word count/Time provided: equiv. 3000 words Weighting: 30% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-‐1, ULO-‐2, ULO-‐3, ULO-‐4 Assessment 1 Detail

Assessment Task

Type Weighti ng

Due Length ULOs

Assessment 1: Laboratory Practicum Students undertake in-‐class quizzes as well as a series of network configuration/design tasks (include network troubleshooting activities).

Individual

Invigilated

30% Weeks 3, 4, 5, 7, 8,

(equiv. 3000 Words)

ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4

Assessment 2: Case Study Part A: Design and implement a solution to a large scale WAN networking problem (using a simulator) justifying design choices and approaches. Part B: Present and defend the design

Group

Part A: 20%

Part B: 15%

Week 10

Weeks 11, 12

2500 words

+ 10 minute

presentation (equiv. 1000 Words)

ULO1 ULO2 ULO3

Assessment 3: Enterprise Networking Analysis This task involves a comprehensive network infrastructure. This task for Enterprise Networking analysis involvers as comprehensive review on Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). VoIP on packet switching enterprise networks is one of the rapidly emerging real-‐time application over the IEEE 802.11 WiFi networks. Students are required to analyse current WIFi standard and critical thinking skills.

Individual

35% Week 12 (equiv. 2500

words)

ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4

This assessment includes a quiz and a Practical exercise that will assess your ability to understand and apply theoretical materials in a simulated environment. The quiz will be either multiple choice questions or short questions which are relevant to the lectures of lecture materials. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials) and engage in the unit’s activities. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading materials. Practical exercises assess students’ ability to apply theoretical learning to practical, real-‐world situations on a biweekly basis. The practical exercises will improve student’s ability to practice cloud computing using different cloud platforms specified in the weekly workshop activities. Students will be required to complete the practical exercises during the workshop and therefore, attendance is required as part of this assessment. Students will not be assessed on work that not produced in workshop so that attendance is required as part of this assessment. Students are required to submit the work that they have completed during the workshop session only. The details of the lab work and requirements are provided on the online learning system. Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric There will be 6 quizzes and 6 labs. quizzes and labs will have questions and activities to be completed for a total of 100 marks then will be scaled to 30.

Assessment 1 Lab Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria

Not Satisfactory (0-‐49% of the criterion mark)

Satisfactory (50-‐64% of the criterion mark)

Good (65-‐74% of the criterion mark)

Very Good (75-‐84% of the criterion mark)

Excellent (85-‐100% of the criterion mark)

Lab Completion (10 Marks) Activities and questions completed by the due date

Student has been unable to provide at least 50% of the cumulative mark of the chapter labs.

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 50%-‐64% of the chapter labs.

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 65%-‐74% of the chapter labs.

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 75%-‐84% of the chapter labs.

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 85%-‐100% of the chapter labs.

Apply Technical Knowledge (45 Marks) Connect, Setup, configure lab tasks as requested in the lab document

Major errors in the submission. Working lab not completely demonstrated.

Demonstrated some analysis with a partially working lab with very limited description.

Demonstrated sound judgement and analysis of a fully working lab with brief description supported by some diagrams.

Demonstrated good judgement and analysis of a fully working lab with good description supported by good quality diagrams.

Demonstrated exceptional judgement and analysis of a fully working lab with comprehensive description supported by high-‐quality diagrams.

Apply Theoretical Knowledge (45 Marks)

Answer to most of the questions were inconsistent and did not match with the approach taken to complete the assessment tasks.

Answered most of the questions with some minor errors and demonstrated fair understanding of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered most of the questions satisfactorily and demonstrated sound understanding of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated good understanding and analysis of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated exceptional understanding and analysis of the completed assessment tasks.

Assessment 2: Case Study Due date: Week 10 Group/individual: Individual, and Group Word count/Time provided: Part A 2500 words and Part B equiv 1000 words Weighting: Part A 20% Part B 15% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO-‐4 Assessment 2 Detail

Task Description Imagine that APIC has employed you as a junior network administrator. As part of your duty, you are requested to configure and manage a network lab to perform tests before they are deployed to the actual network. The networking lab imitates a typical enterprise network with headquarters and two branches connected over the Internet. The high-‐level logical topology of the network is given in Figure 1, and the physical layout of the offices is given in Figure 2.

Figure 1 Logical layout.

Figure 2 Physical View To study the network before the actual deployment, you will use a network simulator to complete the following tasks: Part A 60 Marks weighing 20% • Task 1 (12 marks): Network simulation. In this task, you will create the network using Packet Tracer from its logical topology and perform all necessary configurations for the network devices to make it operational. Verify the network connectivity and document the network configurations following the configuration management practice. • Task 2 (Part A 12 marks): Select a suitable network management architecture to manage the network, then implement the architecture using SNMPv2c. make sure to document performance baselining for the network connectivity. • Task 3 (Part A 15 marks): A staff member at the branch network reports that she cannot upload documents to a shared folder of the headquarter network document server. Outline the troubleshooting steps you would use to solve this issue. • Task 4 (Part A 12 marks): APIC at HQ/BranchA/BranchB wants to upgrade its campus network due to the recent change in the student number (increased by 20% overall) and expansion of the university proposed by 2026 (a further increase by up to 60% overall).

New network upgrade requirements: Wireless connectivity using wifi6/ax technology APs every 5 square meters All Office applications to move from desktop to Office 365 50% of all courses to be delivered online using MS Teams from campus in hybrid mode. Your team need to report on all the updates in technologies that will be required to ensure the new network upgrade will be successful. • Task 5 (Part A 9 marks): Propose two upgrade solutions in detail and perform all necessary analyses to select one solution. Explain how the selected solution would be successful. Part B 40 Marks weighing 15% Task 6 (Part B 40 marks ): Present and defend your business case proposal. Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric Part A

Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria

Not Satisfactory (0-‐49% of the criterion mark)

Satisfactory (50-‐64% of the criterion mark)

Good (65-‐74% of the criterion mark)

Very Good (75-‐84% of the criterion mark)

Excellent (85-‐100% of the criterion

mark) Physical network

topology (1.8 marks)

Not suitable hardware configuration Not suitable link technologies Not correct physical

topology with a sufficient notation.

suitable hardware configuration Not suitable link technologies

correct physical

topology with a sufficient notation.

Competent hardware configuration Competent link technologies

Competent physical topology with a sufficient

notation.

Suitable hardware configuration Suitable link technologies

Correct physical

topology with a sufficient notation.

With minor errors

Suitable hardware configuration Suitable link technologies

Correct physical

topology with a sufficient notation.

Device configuration (3.6 marks)

Incorrect IP addressing scheme. Incorrect basic administrative configuration i.e., device name, time zone, clock and device access control.

correct IP addressing scheme. Incorrect basic administrative configuration i.e., device name, time zone, clock and device access control.

Competent IP addressing scheme. Competent basic administrative configuration i.e., device name, time zone, clock and device access control.

Competent interface

Correct IP addressing scheme. Correct basic administrative configuration i.e., device name, time zone, clock and device access control.

Incorrect interface

configuration i.e. interface IP address and

status.

correct interface configuration i.e. interface IP address and status.

configuration i.e. interface IP address and

status.

Correct interface

configuration i.e. interface IP address and

status. With minor

errors

Correct interface

configuration i.e. interface IP address and

status.

Internetwork routing

configuration (3.6 marks)

Incorrect Correct configuration of OSPF. No Evidence of the network connectivity verification No Document network physical and logical topology with a sufficient notation No Document network inventory i.e. detailed network hardware and software No Document the current configurations of each device in the network

No Configuration

change management

correct Correct configuration of OSPF. No Evidence of the network connectivity verification Document network physical and logical topology with a sufficient notation Document network inventory i.e. detailed network hardware and software Document the current configurations of each device in the network

No Configuration

change management

Competent configuration of OSPF. Competent Evidence of the network connectivity verification Competent Document network physical and logical topology with a sufficient notation Competent Document network inventory i.e. detailed network hardware and software Competent Document the current configurations of each device in the network

Competent Configuration

change management

Correct configuration of OSPF. Evidence of the network connectivity verification Document network physical and logical topology with a sufficient notation Document network inventory i.e. detailed network hardware and software Document the current configurations of each device in the network Configuration

change management With minor

errors

change management

record a short video clip in “Studio” (5 min max) (3 marks)

Most details are not provided implementatio

n of the network using Packet Tracer

not demonstrated correctly-‐ no sound, no video, no

packet tracer

Most details are provided implementatio

n of the network using Packet Tracer

not demonstrated correctly-‐

sound but no video

Some details are provided

Explain your implementation of the network using Packet Tracer not completely

demonstrated

Provide your details your name, student id, year and the the unit you are studying Explain your implementatio n of the network using Packet Tracer. talk about your selection of

the network hardware, link technologies, and device configuration. Demonstrate the network connectivity between the headquarters

and the branches. With minor

errors

the network hardware, link technologies, and device configuration. Demonstrate the network connectivity between the headquarters

and the branches.

Select a suitable network

management architecture and justify the selection. (1.2

Marks)

Fail to Successfully select suitable

network management architecture and justified the selection

Successfully select suitable

network management architecture but not

justified the selection

Competently selected suitable

network management

architecture and justified the selection

Successfully selected suitable network

management architecture and justified the selection With minor

errors

Successfully selected suitable network

management architecture and justified the selection

Correctly configure

SNMPv2c on each network device (2.4 Marks)

Fail configure SNMPv2c on each network device. Many details are incorrect or missing.

configure SNMPv2c on each network device. Many details are incorrect or missing.

Competently configured

SNMPv2c on each network device. Some details are incorrect or missing.

Successfully configured SNMPv2c on each network

device. With minor

errors

Successfully configured SNMPv2c on each network

device.

Successfully verify SNMPv2 setup with snmpwalk utility (1.2 Marks)

Fail to verify SNMPv2 setup with snmpwalk

utility

verify SNMPv2 setup with snmpwalk utility with errors

Competently verified SNMPv2

setup with snmpwalk utility

Successfully verified

SNMPv2 setup with snmpwalk

utility With minor

errors

Successfully verified

SNMPv2 setup with snmpwalk

utility

Correctly identify

performance parameters for baselining (1.2 Marks)

Fail to identify performance parameters for

baselining

identify performance parameters for

baselining

Competently identified

performance parameters for

baselining

Correctly identified

performance parameters for

baselining With minor

errors

Correctly identified

performance parameters for

baselining

Correctly calculate the baselines of

the parameters (1.2 Marks)

Fail to Correctly

calculate the baselines of

the parameters

But Fail to Correctly

calculate the baselines of

the parameters

Competently Correctly

calculate the baselines of the parameters

Correctly calculate the baselines of

the parameters With minor

errors

Correctly calculate the baselines of

the parameters

record a short video clip in “Studio” (10 min max) (4.8

marks)

Most details are not provided

Selection, implementatio

n and configurations

not demonstrated

and not explained -‐ no sound, no

video, no packet tracer

Most details are provided

Selection, implementatio

n and configurations

but not demonstrated

and not explained – good sound but no video, no packet tracer

Some details are provided

Selection, implementation

and configurations not completely demonstrated

and not very well explained

Provide your details e.g. your name, student id, year and the unit you are studying Explain your selection of the network management architecture and show the implementatio n of the architecture on Packet Tracer. Explain your SNMPv2c configuration on a network device. Demonstrate the working

SNMPv2c using the snmpwalk

utility. With minor

errors

SNMPv2c using the snmpwalk

utility.

Select a troubleshootin g approach and correctly follow the approach (6

Marks)

Failed to Select a

troubleshootin g approach and correctly follow the approach

Select a troubleshootin g approach but not correctly follow the approach

Competently Select a

troubleshooting approach and correctly follow the approach

Correctly Select a

troubleshootin g approach and correctly follow the approach With minor

errors

Correctly Select a

troubleshootin g approach and correctly follow the approach

Correctly identify the type of

information that should be collected at each step (6

Marks)

Failed to identify the type of

information that should be collected at each step

identify the type of

information that should be collected at each step but did not collect

Competently identify the type of information that should be

collected at each step

Correctly identify the type of

information that should be collected at each step

Correctly identify the type of

information that should be collected at each step

Correctly propose the hypothesis to be tested at each step (3

Marks)

Failed propose the hypothesis to be tested at

each step

propose the hypothesis to be tested at each step but tests were not

done

Competently propose the

hypothesis to be tested at each

step

Correctly propose the hypothesis to be tested at each step With minor

errors

Correctly propose the hypothesis to be tested at each step

Key applications and services: identify key network and application services

provided by the current network. (2.4

mark)

Failed to identify key network and application services

provided by the current network

identify key network and application services

provided by the current network

Competently identify key network and application

services provided by the current

network

Correctly identify key network and application services

provided by the current network

With minor errors

Correctly identify key network and application services

provided by the current network

IP addressing scheme: use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to work out the IP addressing scheme of the

network. Obtain

information like IP

subnets/mask s, IP addresses

of the gateways, DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP servers. (6 mark)

Failed to use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to

work out the IP addressing

scheme of the network. Failed to Obtain

information like IP

subnets/masks , IP addresses

of the gateways, DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP

servers.

use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to

work out the IP addressing

scheme of the network. Failed to Obtain

information like IP

subnets/masks , IP addresses

of the gateways, DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP

servers.

Competently use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to work

out the IP addressing

scheme of the network.

Competently Obtain

information like IP subnets/masks, IP addresses of the gateways,

DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP

servers.

Correctly use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to

work out the IP addressing

scheme of the network. Correctly Obtain

information like IP

subnets/masks , IP addresses

of the gateways, DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP

servers. With minor

errors

Correctly use tools like ipconfig,

tracert and wireshark to

work out the IP addressing

scheme of the network. Correctly Obtain

information like IP

subnets/masks , IP addresses

of the gateways, DNS servers, Web servers, Email servers, DHCP

servers.

High-‐level logical

topology of the network: draw the logical

topology of the network based on obtained

information. (1.8 mark)

Failed to draw the logical

topology of the network based on obtained information.

draw the logical

topology of the network based on obtained information

with few errors

Competently draw the logical topology of the

network based on obtained

information.

Correctly draw the logical

topology of the network based on obtained information. With minor

errors

Correctly draw the logical

topology of the network based on obtained information.

Wi-‐Fi channels and overall area of

coverage: perform

wireless site survey for the

current

Failed to erform

wireless site survey for the

current wireless network

perform wireless site survey for the

current wireless

network with missing

information

Competently perform wireless site survey for the current wireless

network

Correctly perform

wireless site survey for the

current wireless network

Correctly perform

wireless site survey for the

current wireless network

wireless network. (1.8

mark)

With minor errors

The correctness, feasibility and future-‐proof

of the proposed

solutions. (3 mark).

The proposed solutions were not feasible,

future proof or correct

The proposed solutions were feasible, but not future proof and minor error

The proposed solutions were somewhat

feasible, future proof and correct

The proposed solutions were feasible, future

proof and correct

With minor errors

The proposed solutions were feasible, future

proof and correct

At the minimum, you will need to provide the high-‐level logical and physical

design of the solutions with the list of major

hardware and software to be obtained. (3

mark).

Failed to provide the high-‐level logical and

physical design of the

solutions. No list of major hardware and software were obtained.

provide the high-‐level logical and

physical design of the

solutions. No list of major hardware and software were obtained.

Competently provide the high-‐ level logical and physical design of the solutions

including a list of major hardware

and software obtaine

Correctly provide the high-‐level logical and

physical design of the

solutions with the list of major

hardware and software obtained. With minor

errors

Correctly provide the high-‐level logical and

physical design of the

solutions with the list of major

hardware and software obtained.

Discuss how the selected

solution would expect to solve the identified

problem and how does this align with the university long-‐term

business goal and strategy of student number

uncrease. (3 mark).

The selected solution was not discussed

The selected solution was

briefly discussed

The selected solution was somewhat discussed

The selected solution was correctly discussed With minor

errors

The selected solution was correctly discussed

Part B The

presentation structure and quality. (12

mark)

Failed to provide clear structure and scope of the presentation. Text and images are poorly

presented

provide clear structure and scope of the presentation. Text and images are poorly

presented

A good structure and scope of the presentation. The slides present only the key

points. Text and images are well

presented

A clear structure and scope of the presentation. The slides

present only the key points.

Text and images are

A clear structure and scope of the presentation. The slides

present only the key points.

Text and images are

clearly presented With few

minor errors

clearly presented

Presenter performance. Present clearly and engage with the audience. Finish the

presentation on time. Handle

questions with confidence and quality answers. (28

mark)

Presenter was not clear and did not engage

with the audience. did not Finish the presentation on time. Did not Handled

questions well.

Presenter was clear and did not engage with the audience. Finish the

presentation on time. Did not Handled

questions well.

Presenter was somewhat clear and engaging. Finished the

presentation on time. Handled questions with confidence and quality answers.

Presenter was clear and

engaged with the audience. Finished the presentation on time. Handled

questions with confidence and

quality answers. With few

minor errors

Presenter was clear and

engaged with the audience. Finished the presentation on time. Handled

questions with confidence and

quality answers.

Assessment 3: Enterprise Networking Analysis Due date: Week 12 Group/individual: Individual Word count/Time provided: 2500 words Weighting: 35% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-‐1, ULO-‐2, ULO-‐3, ULO-‐4 Assessment 3 Detail:

This task for Enterprise Networking analysis involvers as comprehensive review on Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). VoIP on packet switching enterprise networks is one of the rapidly emerging real-‐time application over the IEEE 802.11 WiFi networks.

The VoIP is a form of audio and voice communication. It receives voice signal activities which are then encoded in digital form and divided into small parts of information in the form of voice data network packets. These data network packets are decoded and transmitted as voice signals then the sender and receiver have a voice conversation.

Task 1

Please, provide a company’s network model diagram and students are required to provide VoIP Network background, VoIP protocol architecture diagram.

Task 2

Please, provide VoIP over WLAN Enterprise Network IEEE 802.11 Standards and MAC details in table form. The IEEE 802.11 WLAN network is a wireless Ethernet, playing an important function in the future-‐generation networks.

Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria

Not Satisfactory (0-‐49% of the criterion mark)

Satisfactory (50-‐64% of the criterion mark)

Good (65-‐74% of the criterion mark)

Very Good (75-‐84% of the criterion mark)

Excellent (85-‐100% of the criterion mark)

Task 1 Completion (25 Marks) Network Model Diagram,

Student has been unable to provide at least 50% of the cumulative mark of the chapter task.

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 50%-‐64% of the chapter task

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 65%-‐74% of the chapter task

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 75%-‐84% of the chapter task

To meet this level, you will attain a cumulative mark between 85%-‐100% of the chapter task

Task 1 Completion (25 Marks) VoIP Network diagram

Major errors in the submission. Working task not completely demonstrated.

Demonstrated some analysis with a partially working task with very limited description.

Demonstrated sound judgement and analysis of a fully working task with brief description supported.

Demonstrated good judgement and analysis of a fully working task with good description supported by good quality diagrams.

Demonstrated exceptional judgement and analysis of a fully working task with comprehensive description supported by high-‐quality diagrams.

Task 2 Completion (25 Marks) Enterprise Network IEEE 802.11 Standards

Answer to most of the questions were inconsistent and did not match with the approach taken to complete the assessment tasks.

Answered most of the questions with some minor errors and demonstrated fair understanding of the completed

Answered most of the questions satisfactorily and demonstrated sound understanding of the completed

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated good understanding and analysis of the completed

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated exceptional understanding and analysis of the completed

assessment tasks.

Task 2 Completion (25 Marks) IEEE 802.11 WLAN network

Answer to most of the questions were inconsistent and did not match with the approach taken to complete the assessment tasks.

Answered most of the questions with some minor errors and demonstrated fair understanding of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered most of the questions satisfactorily and demonstrated sound understanding of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated good understanding and analysis of the completed assessment tasks.

Answered all questions satisfactorily and demonstrated exceptional understanding and analysis of the completed assessment tasks.